Web Search powered by YAHOO! SEARCH
03.03.2008 3:36 pm

Democratic energy policies have denied Americans jobs and hurt the economy

St. Louis Post-Dispatch
  • Email this
  • Print this

It is the Democratic policies that deny the opening of oil fields on American soil and off shore. Washington’s leftist regulations have stopped energy companies from building refineries. For decades, special interest groups such as the Sierra Club and Green Peace have lobbied for legislation that denies American companies access to domestic oil fields. Wikipedia.com list 89 environmental groups. Special interests and Democratic politicians in the federal government and the state level have achieved a stranglehold over America’s oil resources. It is common knowledge that maintains ,with more oil in the market our consumers would see the price of oil drop and stabilize. At this time, the American consumers are at the mercy of OPEC and states such as Venezuela. The United States economy, and every citizen is dependant on the most unstable countries in the world and stated enemies.

With the removal or correction of leftist policies, American companies would expand in business and hire American workers. These high quality jobs would provide workers with benefits such as health insurance and a retirement plan, something that everyone desires. Added to that failure are the Democratic policies and special interest lawsuits, by trial lawyers, that stop companies from building refineries. The cost of lawsuits are passed on to the consumer as a business expense, raising gas prices. These refineries would add gas to the market and cause the price of gas to be reduced. Again, refineries provide good high paying jobs with benefits for workers. America’s last refinery was built in Garyville, Louisiana in 1976. I’m amazed that gas isn’t higher. Another point to consider, is the cost of goods and services that increase with fuel and oil based materials. America’s natural resources should be used to grow good jobs domestically instead of outsourcing the jobs to the Middle East. It is interesting that Communist China, working with the Cuban government, is in the process of building an oil field off the Florida coast.

These investments in American resources would deny terror states U.S. funding via the oil market. The Left has denied voters the financial stability that American jobs provide while growing an important sector of business. At this time of economic upheaval, high quality jobs in the energy sector would provide American citizens long term financial stability that NAFTA has denied since the Clinton administration. Clearly, the Democrats have failed to protect an American economic sector that needs to expand for quality jobs, voters financial stability and national security. It is this writers opinion, that ultimately America is better off with high paying long term jobs and energy independence from the Middle East. America needs to bring jobs home starting with the energy sector.

Mike Moseley

Staunton

Tags: ,
23 comments

Comments are closed.

And now for something completely different….reality!

Oil was at $25 a barrell before the Iraqi war and industry projections said it would remain at that level for 7-10 years.

Bush got us out of Afghanistan, where OSB hangs out with his Taliban buddies after attacking us on 9/11, and into a $3 trillion war in Iraq because Saddam tried to kill his daddy and he had a lot of Big Oil IOU’s from his election. Now the al Qaeda folks and Taliban are selling Afghan heroin to finance their resurgance and to wage war on America here at home.

http://dangerousintersection.org/2006/08/13/afghanistan-democracy-is-drowning-in-illegal-drugs/

Oil is now at $101 a barrell, Oil companies have record profits and oil is well in Bushy land for W and his merry band of crooksters. God save America from the Republicans!

— Tim Hogan
4:20 pm March 3rd, 2008

It was Republican policies that have lost American automotive jobs. By not raising CAFE standards, Detroit had no incentive to change.

By allowing huge deductions for purchases of gas guzzling SUVs, but only relatively small deductions for energy efficient cars (hybrids, electrics)j, they encouraged American consumers to become dependent on oil and demanding huge SUVs from Detroit.

As reported above, a war was started in an oil-rich country. This has made Iraq’s oilfields unusable for long periods of time and created an atmosphere of American-distate in the rest of the oil rich nations.

All brought to you by Republicans. Don’t blame Democrats for not being able to undo 10+ years of bad policies in less than 14 months.

— suzyjax
4:56 pm March 3rd, 2008

Suzy, that is the LAMEST excuse I have ever heard. CAFE standards will NOT bring down the price of fuel, or the rate of consumption. It will INCREASE the amount of fuel used, making us MORE dependant. If you spend $50 a week for fuel and can go 550 miles on that fuel, you will end up driving more when you can go 600 or 700 miles on that same $50.
Timmy, you want to know why oil is over $100 a barrel? The Commodity Futures Modernization Act of 2000 changed the way oil is traded, now it is less regulated than ever and the speculators are just running up the price. I forget, who was President on December 21, 2000, the day the act was signed into law?

Now take a look at this: No Zones!. See that map? Those are all places we cant drill. Now would one of you moonbats PLEASE tell me how the hell we are EVER going to be off foreign oil when we cant exploit our own known reserves?

— Si Vis Pacem Para Bellum
6:20 pm March 3rd, 2008

You can’t win with liberals…not they are against wind power because it might kill a few migrating birds during the course of a year. Yeah, I guess it’s better to pay $4 per gallon and throw the economy into a tailspin than sacrifice a few birds. But, we can look at those pretty flying geese…yippie!!!!

Also, wind power was supported by the left until it affected the elitists…Ted Kennedy fought legislation for wind farms off of the cost of Nantuckett - it was going to ruin his view of the ocean while he sailed on his yacht. (The wind farm wouldn’t be visible from land).

The hypocrisy of the left is absolutely astounding!

— Gaucho
6:28 pm March 3rd, 2008

And two ex-oil pimps have run the executive office for 7 years. You can’t win with oil pimps. Or their supporters.

— A-German-in-1937
8:39 pm March 3rd, 2008

Let’s see, in my adult lifetime, there have been two periods of incredible run-ups in the price of crude oil: 1972-74, and 2006-2008. During both of those periods, REPUBLICANS were in the white house, escaping just in time to dump the problem on a Democrat, who then got (or will get) blamed for the repercussions that followed.

I see other parallels: in the early ’70’s, there was an actual policy among domestic auto makers that went, “big cars mean big profits, small cars mean small profits”, and when the oil embargo hit, and demand appeared for small, economic vehicles, Detroit responded with the Vega, the Pinto, and the Gremlin. Is the same thing getting ready to happen again?

By the way, I do agree with the assessment that groups like the Sierra club and others have never seen any energy policy they like. Ted Kennedy and the Nantucket wind farm is just silly. And, there are plenty of people in his own party who have told him so. Somebody, someday, is going to have to stop saying “NO”. The great blackout of 2003 should have been a wakeup call. It was largely ignored by everyone outside the electric utility industry…..and the next time, it will be worse. I don’t see the big environmental groups moving out of their air-conditioned buildings :)

— hs
9:16 pm March 3rd, 2008

The right-wing is still with us this time living in la la land with head buried all the way to the waist. Blaming the oil crisis on the goofy Democrats is like blaming WWII on Australia. Imagining someone so totally out of touch with reality as to blame the oil crisis on someone else while Dick Cheney is in charge of US energy policy is taking Fantasyland to new levels unheard of. Perhaps next week, Mr. Mosely will blame the Ten trillion dollar US deficit on tax cuts for hobos.

— Jom
5:30 am March 4th, 2008

There go all these bleeding heart liberals crying again. It is always some one else’ fault no matter what. CAFE standards are a joke, global warming is a hoax and liberals are idiots. If you want cheaper oil, get the hell out of the way and let the oil companies drill where the oil is, and build Nuke power facilities for electric. Coke and Pepsi make more profits per ounce than the oil companies, why not tax them to death too. Hell, just let Uncle take them over, like the libs want to do with health care. We will be sitting in line for gas and waiting for months to see a Doc. Libs, get an education, get a job and take responsibility for yourselves for a change. It is really not that hard.

— John D
6:30 am March 4th, 2008

We are doing a whole lot of assuming here. If the US drilled and discovered oil in, say, ANWAR, that oil goes directly from Alaska right into the tank of my brand new Ford Exploder with the oversized Firestone Shredmaster tires, right? Actually, the federal government leases oil rights to oil companies, who in turn drill the oil, store the oil, and sell the oil, to whomever will pay the highest price for it. We are kidding ourselves if we assume that oil from this country, stays in this country.

Secondly, are we purporting that the poor, pitiful oil lobbyists are stymied in their efforts to build more refineries by the all-powerful lobbyists of the mega-conglomerate, multi-complex, world dominating environmental industries like Greenpeace and the Sierra Club? Does anyone know the address of BP or Exxon, so I can send a contribution and help them in their quest to provide more good American jobs and rid them of those pesky record profits they have to endure?

I love Dom Perignon. But I just can’t afford it–so I rarely drink it. I curb my consumption, rather than blame liberals for the problem–what a concept.

— Commander Barkfeather
7:51 am March 4th, 2008

The politicians and lobbyists live off arguments like this. Democrat, Republican, left wing, right wing; meanwhile the federal bureaucracy borrows from the future and sells off the past. It reminds me of a couple of toddlers fighting over a bag of potato chips till the unopened bag contains nothing but crumbs.

As long as the special interests on both sides (environuts and oil barons) manipulate the politicians and bureaucrats in Washington D.C. the taxpayers and consumers of the USA will keep getting screwed.

Can people not look at the last half century of governance and see what is happening regardless of party? Please, please, take off the partisan blinders for a moment and look at what we are doing to our legacy by ignoring the wisdom of the U.S. Constitution.

— Bb
8:42 am March 4th, 2008

Pages: [1] 2 3 » Show All