Web Search powered by YAHOO! SEARCH
03.17.2008 4:38 pm

Thanks to the Supreme Court, businesses will protect consumers

St. Louis Post-Dispatch
  • Email this
  • Print this

Thank God for the Republican Supreme Court.  In a recent decision, this strict constructionist court held that consumers injured by a defective medical device cannot bring another costly lawsuit.  These pesky lawsuits are harming big pharmaceutical companies.  I don’t care if ordinary people are devastated by defective products.  In the long run, we are better served by profits to big business.  While we’re at it let’s reduce most, if not all, tort cases.  They are costly to business, and eventually, to all of us.Let people who are harmed handle the burden on their own.The courts should be open only for businesses to fight over contracts and such.  Let’s also eliminate taxes on corporations.  These hurt the consumer in the long run and are a drag on the economy.  Let’s also any regulation of business.  Business will regulate itself.  Pollution will be decreased because they will see that it is in their own self-interest to clean up after themselves. Let the free market rule! 

David R. Jones

Edwardsville


It’s Tax Time! Get tips, forms and advice on AOL Money & Finance.

19 comments

Comments are closed.

Chickens, meet Mr. Fox, he’ll be guarding your hen house from now on. He has your best interests at stomach…errr, I mean heart.

— Red State Funnel Cake
6:08 pm March 17th, 2008

Mr. Jones,

It is probably a waste of time trying to reason with someone that honestly believes the problem with American is not it is not easy enough to sue and that we need more government regulations.

It is obvious that you do not have a basic understanding of economic principals. For example, it is not in the best interest of a pharmaceutical company to make a drug that kill people. The government can have a role by disseminating information about the drug to allow people to decide whether the benefits exceed the risks. Extreme regulation and parasitic law firms drive up the cost and time to market of the drug. The citizens suffer by not getting the drugs they need at the cheapest possible price.

You can pass laws to make people such as yourself feel better. You cannot pass laws that repeal the basic principle of market based economics.

— David H.
7:08 pm March 17th, 2008

All lawsuit caps should be eliminated. Why should hospitals or doctors care if a patient dies or suffers other complications if there is no consequences for their actions.

They figure hey I can’t be sued or if sued for just a small sum as settlement, so who cares if I don’t try hard enough to save or treat a patient effectively. I’m still getting paid and that’s all that matters in the long run.

— Steve
7:14 pm March 17th, 2008

Here, here!! What a jolly good letter!! Points out that the human race has become once again some kind of 19th century tool to be used by the large corporations same as a drill press or a disposable diaper. Use it up, throw it away.

— willys
7:31 pm March 17th, 2008

David do you work for a pharma company about ready to lay you off?

Get real.

Your letter makes you sound like some crazed individual. Were you drunk when you wrote this letter??

— Mohammed
7:36 pm March 17th, 2008

That was a joke letter. Right?

— slamfist
8:22 pm March 17th, 2008

Mohd.

You do not sound drunk. You merely sound like an uneducated person that does not understand basic economics.

— David H.
9:30 pm March 17th, 2008

Oh shove your Economic bull. You’re so uneducated, David, maybe you will be a Doctor’s mistake….they bury their mistakes. And maybe you’ll take a new med and it will do a number on you permanently and you better not sue; wouldn’t want to toil with the economics of the matter.

— Scott
9:41 pm March 17th, 2008

Post #2—-Either drunk or idiotic.

— Cher
9:43 pm March 17th, 2008

I’m David and I’m majoring in Econ 101 and I know my stuff damnit.

— Dan
9:46 pm March 17th, 2008

Pages: [1] 2 » Show All