Web Search powered by YAHOO! SEARCH
04.29.2008 3:12 pm

Questions remain about county’s recycling plan

St. Louis Post-Dispatch

My rage about the trash situation in St Louis County only became more outrageous when I read Phil Sutin’s column this morning concerning the efforts by state legislators to modify the program.  

When those ugly barrels/containers were pitched onto our lawns several weeks ago, I called the county information line to find out when this plan was to go into effect and I asked several questions that had bothered me about the situation.  Calling the information line is akin to calling a cat–there is absolutely no response.  I guess that when they do not wish to speak to county residents, they simply activate their voice mail. When I begin questioning the woman who finally answered, I was told that this was a mandate by the state to stop filling up the landfills.   Sutin’s column appears to refute that assertion, as do the legislators interviewed for the article

Then when I asked, why, if I recycle papers and aluminum cans by taking them to a local church school and plastic bags to a supermarket bin, will I still be expected to pay for recycling.  Now there’s a case of doublespeak if I ever heard one.  The woman (she characterized herself as a volunteer) told me that it is just as expensive for the hauler to stop at my house as at the next house, because I certainly would have some trash that had to be recycled, and it still would have to be sorted by someone. 

Then I said, “the schools get paid now for the recycling efforts,so how will the schools be reimbursed, since they use the money for educational purposes and we have heard nothing about trash haulers returning any money to them.”  I didn’t get an answer.

In a time and place where the term “trash hauler” is synonymous with graft/corruption/crime, I would like to know precisely how the contracts are let and who we can count on being re-elected time and time again because of waste haulers contributions to election campaigns.

Who manipulates these situations wherein promises of money going to schools from the gambling boats is rhetoric and taking money from schools by removing recycling bins is simply another way of extracting campaign funds. 

Ruth Karraker

St. Louis County

6 comments

Comments are closed.

Comparing county government to cats is highly offensive…….to the cats.

Tony Soprano is alive and well and living in St. Louis County.

— Mike
4:48 pm April 29th, 2008

Someone will make out like a bandit on this deal and it will not be the county citizens.

— eagle_eye222001
7:36 pm April 29th, 2008

Ruth, if trash collection were the biggest problem we faced today, we would truly be a blessed people!!!

— willys
9:29 am April 30th, 2008

I can’t be the only person in St. Louis County who actually likes the fact that my trash hauler also takes away my recycling. I no longer have to sort the various things to be recycled and make numerous trips to different drop off stations. I was provided with a comprehensive list of things that can be recycled (more than I knew about). I need another bin for my recycling items as I can now recycle much more than before. My city (Green Park) pays for 1/wk trash/recycling pickup, they negotiated a contract. Some think this is too much government involvement in citizens lives. I think it’s efficient and saves me time and money.

— Momof1girl
10:00 am April 30th, 2008

Great comments, willys and Momof1girl!

— Robert M Walsh
1:00 pm April 30th, 2008

Ruth…I am sorry to see that your personal rights are being infringed upon by the evil St. Louis County gevernment. I am sure that they will put just as much thought into your complaints whe you propose that if you have no children in a public school your property taxes should be decreased by 60%.

— malz1265
3:06 pm April 30th, 2008