Web Search powered by YAHOO! SEARCH
05.14.2008 10:55 am

At what prices do the Democrats open the oil fields?

St. Louis Post-Dispatch

We are in the middle of a economic crises because of the price of oil and gas. However, U.S. energy policies are outdated and have stopped the American economy cold. These outdated leftist policies have succeeded in making energy cost more than we can afford. Americans don’t need more regulations from Washington. America needs more oil supply and more refinery capacity. The only place that we can’t get oil is from all our domestic sources. If you feel that gas is too high, please thank the Democratic environmental energy policies that have overwhelmed the American economy.

We as a nation are at a crossroads. Should we continue to pay higher and higher prices at the pump? Will we import oil from terrorist countries and watch the American economy go into a deep recession. Or should we make a decision to open domestic oil fields and build more refineries? That would provide Americans with more oil in the market, lower prices and add high paying, long term employment. The Democrats answer is their recent legislation to ban oil drilling in Alaska permanently. http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/americas/6236367.stm It would seem the Democrats have decided the American voters want higher energy prices with no chance for higher quality employment, especially in Alaska. With world wide consumption levels higher than production levels by approximately 5 million barrels a day.* http://www.saudinf.com/main/z001.htm Americans can expect the oil price to continue to rise. When the Democrats won the election in 2006, the price for a barrel of oil was at the $58 mark. The left’s stranglehold on the domestic oil supply is troubling indeed. The Democrats are forcing America to buy oil from terrorist states.

The Democrats have refused to open domestic oil fields to support the voters and the American economy. When the left took over in the fall of 2006 the price for a barrel of oil was $58. At this time a barrel of crude oil is $124. The Democrats will wait for $130, $150,$180 or even $200 per barrel. Something to consider with each of these marks is, will the economy crumble further at $150 to $200 per barrel. I don’t need to guess the answer. Just like every reader knows, the economy will be in ruins. Americans that haven’t got financial problems now will have them in the future with energy prices rising more by the day.

Something else to consider, is when we open domestic oil fields off shore, in Alaska and every place available, many high paying, long term jobs will help the America family and every business. I believe that these new jobs will have a stabilizing effect on the economy and starve off further economic problems. Most importantly, this a great opportunity to rebuild and develop all of America’s infrastructure. The infrastructure of America needs to be upgraded and expanded as it is. These new jobs would move this country into the 21st century and include oil field workers, refinery workers, and construction workers of all kinds. Iron workers, carpenters, pipe fitters, electricians, millwrights, laborers, painters, all the technical workers, office workers and engineers will be needed for America’s growth. This opportunity will offer high paying long term jobs to a generation of the American working men and women.

Again I ask, at what price do the Democrats open the oil fields?

Mike Moseley

Staunton

1 Star2 Stars3 Stars4 Stars5 Stars (3 votes, average: 3.67 out of 5)
Loading ... Loading ...
68 comments

Comments are closed.

Figure when gas hits around $7 to $8 per gallon, there will be dems rioting in the streets, burning buildings and looting.

— TB
4:46 pm May 14th, 2008

TB

What you posted may be true, but lets hope not.

— JD
4:52 pm May 14th, 2008

You remind me of the guy in the jail cell in Trading Places. You know, the one who all he could contribute to the conversation was to repeatedly say “Yeah!”

— publicschooled
7:53 pm May 14th, 2008

Hi publicschooled,

Guess you haven’t met JD yet or others of his ilk, (like TB) if they are even separate people. Mostly they just name call, but recently I got JD to claim he was spat upon by hippies in a San Fran airport returning from Nam. He also favors torture. I’m not sure who, other than himself he might be referring to when he warns of crazies. You can skip his postings if you find repetitive eye rolling too painful.

To answer the Mike Moseley question, since the oil companies have proven so completely trustworthy, holding secret meetings with Big Dick the gun safety poster boy and after promising to build new refineries for a giant tax break, and after failing after all these years to pay the fines for ruining Prince William Sound, and after failing to upgrade existing facilities causing explosions that killed and maimed employees all during times of record profits, the answer is when we nationalize the oil companies for the national security threat that their incompetence and/or criminal malfeasance poses to the stability of the United States that would be my price.

— Rich Brown
9:06 pm May 14th, 2008

Bb,

Your mentioning of switchgrass is something I’ve heard before, but didn’t realize it was that much more productive. My question to you is-is switchgrass a native grass or an invasive species? If it isn’t a nuisance species and if it has that kind of value in ethanol production why don’t we plant it in the rights of way and medians of interstates and state hwys.? MoDot could then harvest it and actually contribute something positive to transportation in Mo. Same for windmills. Medians and rights-of -way could be utilized for both. The traffic would generate some wind all by itself.

— Rich Brown
9:42 pm May 14th, 2008

Rich Brown…
http://www.harvestcleanenergy.org/enews/enews_0505/enews_0505_Cellulosic_Ethanol.htm

The info in the above link is a couple of years old. A Google search might provide more recent info. Switch grass is only one of many alternatives to grain based ethanol production that provide more bang for the buck and are more environmentally friendly. However, they don’t seem to have the lobbying constituency of grain producers. I’m also sure there are drawbacks that could be cited, but the discussion and comparisons need to begin. Brazil has shown the way with their successful 15 year effort to reduce or eliminate oil imports.

— Bb
7:22 am May 15th, 2008

I only post under my initials and no others. I don’t have the formal education as you do, but still have my opinions. What I stated in a previous thread is fact, whether you believe it or not, is up to you. It may have been an isolated incident, I don’t know, but what happened, happened.

— JD
9:13 am May 15th, 2008

Rich-
All excellent suggestions to make otherwise unproductive space useful-unfortunately it makes too much sense to be something politicians will back.I believe switchgrass is native, therefore quite low maintenance to grow.I have often thought that all that space would serve a better and lower maintenance purpose if it were planted in buffalo grass or wildflowers or anything wildlife-friendly just to reduce mowing needs at the very least.I really like the efficiency of your ideas,though.Anything would be an improvement over the boring monoculture of grass.It is about time America looked around and found alternatives to oil as so many other countries have.

— going green in caseyville
9:14 am May 15th, 2008

Thanks Going Green,

I’m guessing you’re in Illinois as I don’t think there’s a Caseyville Mo., but it wouldn’t surprise me if there was. I actually think I got the idea for planting the rights-of-way when I was traveling through Illinois on my way to visit the Mother Jones Memorial in Mt. Olive and noticed the immense amount of land that Illinois DOT takes for their interstate rights-of-way compared to Mo. Why is that? Are the preparing for that 4 lane to be a 20 lane someday? That’s real optimism. And those sweeping cloverleaf exits use at least 3 times the room that we Missourians take for ours. Anyway I figure why use farmland already producing food crops when you’ve got all these unused public lands to plant or put up windmills on. Maybe if they were crucial to our energy survival people would stop throwing their trash all over them too. In Mo. you might even get the billboard industry to sponsor windmills to hang their signs on since the legislature can’t seem to get rid of them.

— Rich Brown
11:37 am May 15th, 2008

Bb,

That’s a really good link. More information than human beings should be allowed to have. Switchgrass is a native species according to the site. It doesn’t really say what kind of ecosystems it is native to, but assuming it couldn’t be any worse than the ground covers that DOTs routinely plant now, it could be ideal. If we get to affect energy policy after Nov. we’re going to need to educate the new legislators, before D.C. corrupts them.

— Rich Brown
11:58 am May 15th, 2008

Pages: « 1 [2] 3 4 5 6 7 » Show All