Web Search powered by YAHOO! SEARCH
06.18.2008 4:07 pm

Conservation is the duty of every American

St. Louis Post-Dispatch
  • Email this
  • Print this

For the past month, in response to $4 per gallon gasoline, I have been conducting a driving experiment: I have been setting my cruise control right on 60 mph while on Highways 70, 370, and 270, and have made sure that my tires are properly inflated. I have seen my miles per gallon jump from 25 to 30.

I fill my tank every time I use 10 gallons of gasoline. So for each tank of gas, I am gaining 50 miles of free driving. After six 10-gallon fill ups, I have gained 300 miles. Therefore, my 7th tank of gas, at $40, is “free.”

But I have also noted that more than 95 percent of drivers pass me…many like I am standing still. A Hummer happily passed me recently…going well over 80. Young and old, men and women, little cars and large trucks alike pass me. I get some dirty looks, I get tailgated.

I’m wondering: has it not occurred to most American drivers that we are more consuming more fuel than we need to, and the money we are spending for that fuel is contributing to making market speculators, oil companies (like Exxon Mobil) and OPEC filthy rich?

Doesn’t it make sense to slow down, reduce fuel consumption, save money, reduce greenhouse gasses, and reduce the pornographic profits of those taking advantage of us?

Do we really need the government to tell us to slow down before we decide to do so on our own? Can’t we do this of our own volition, simply because it is the right thing to do? If millions of us combined to do this, the impact would be significant.

The group effort could be construed as an act of collective patriotism during a time of economic and environmental crisis.

Joseph Cusumano, Ph.D.

St. Charles

24 comments

Comments are closed.

“I fill my tank every time I use 10 gallons of gasoline. So for each tank of gas, I am gaining 50 miles of free driving. After six 10-gallon fill ups, I have gained 300 miles. Therefore, my 7th tank of gas, at $40, is “free.””

I’m not a Ph.D, so maybe that is my problem, but I do not see how anything would be free or gained in this. Please explain.

— Huh?
4:52 pm June 18th, 2008

This just in –>

Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory
June 18, 2008
New research suggests that ocean temperature and associated sea level increases between 1961 and 2003 were 50 percent larger than estimated in the 2007 Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change report.

— Lisa12
8:09 pm June 18th, 2008

huh? it’s like this:

By slowing down, Dr. Cusumano has seen an increase in fuel economy from 25 mpg to 30 mpg. So, every 10 gallons of gas he uses, he can go 50 miles further. After 6 10 gallon fill ups, he has gone an extra 300 miles for the same amount of gas, so that tank full (10 gallons/300 miles) is ‘free’.

— hs
9:02 pm June 18th, 2008

“Doesn’t it make sense to slow down, reduce fuel consumption, save money, reduce greenhouse gasses, and reduce the pornographic profits of those taking advantage of us?”

Yes it makes sense to slow down. However, everyone still has a surplus of money. Until we really feel pinched, we will slow down. Apparently, prices are not high enough for most people to care yet! It’s kind of like high prices at a ballpark. We all complain about it. However, a lot of us still go. Why? Because we are a fairly rich country and very few Americans know what poor really is.

“pornographic profits”

That is a subjective opinion. Do you know anything about the risks and costs involve in finding oil, drilling it, refining it, etc…I wouldn’t go through that trouble if I could not make that much money.

You are jealous that these oil companies are making so much money. Take a lesson in economics. Increase supply to drive the price down. The Republicans are trying to, but the Democrats are stopping them.

Whatever side of the battle you are on, there are trade-offs to whatever we do. Right now, we Americans are accepting high prices in the name of not opening up supply. If we want lower gas prices, we need to increase supply somehow. You cannot have everything.

— eagle_eye222001
9:23 pm June 18th, 2008

“huh? it’s like this:

By slowing down, Dr. Cusumano has seen an increase in fuel economy from 25 mpg to 30 mpg. So, every 10 gallons of gas he uses, he can go 50 miles further. After 6 10 gallon fill ups, he has gone an extra 300 miles for the same amount of gas, so that tank full (10 gallons/300 miles) is ‘free’.”

Got it, thanks, hs. I didn’t read carefully enough or think it through and with the paragraph break where it was, I incorrectly took what I quoted as a stand alone statement.

— Huh?
9:57 pm June 18th, 2008

How is it a Democrat or Republica problem that the oil companies will not explore and drill on the over 60 million acres that they already have leases on.

You Republicans are so guiliable to follow along like little sheep making this a political issue against Democrats because leases to drill are not being approved along the shore lines.

DRILL AND EXPLORE ON THE 60 MILLION+ ACRES THAT AREADY HAVE LEASES TO DRILL ON!!

There’s more of a guarantee that oil will be found in any of the places. THAT’S WHY IT IS CALLED oil drill EXPLORATION!! Stop being so guilible!

If the oil companies were serious about exploring for oil, they would get busy doing it.

Maybe the government should cancell those leases and allow someone else to have these leases and explore the land, and since it is such an important commody, I think that maybe the government should begin exploring and owning oil companies if oil is found instead of allowing oil companies to control the supply and demand aspects. After-all these leases are on Federal property!

— D. Walker
10:16 pm June 18th, 2008

Ha Ha!
Flipping and Flopping
and Flopping and Flipping.

(YouTube Video) McCain vs. McCain

“Providing additional incentives for states to permit [oil] exploration off their coasts would be very helpful in the short term resolving our energy crisis.” — John McCain, June 16, 2008

“But I also have to tell you, with those resources, which would take years to develop, it would only postpone or temporarily relieve our dependency on fossil fuels.” — John McCain, May 29, 2008

— Lisa12
11:06 pm June 18th, 2008

Hilarious.
Flipping and Flopping
and Flopping and Flipping.

(YouTube Video) McCain vs. McCain

“Providing additional incentives for states to permit [oil] exploration off their coasts would be very helpful in the short term resolving our energy crisis.” — John McCain, June 16, 2008

“But I also have to tell you, with those resources, which would take years to develop, it would only postpone or temporarily relieve our dependency on fossil fuels.” — John McCain, May 29, 2008

— Lisa12
11:10 pm June 18th, 2008

So, according to the Energy Information Administration of the U.S. Government, if we allow offshore oil drilling, we won’t get any oil until 2030, it will only increase the production in the US by 7%, and any impact on price will be insignificant. Whoopee.

http://www.eia.doe.gov/oiaf/aeo/otheranalysis/ongr.html

— Lisa12
3:07 am June 19th, 2008

I have a similar story to tell. It’s amazing what just a reduction of 5 MPH will do to fuel economy. My mileage is right at the point where buying a new vehicle is not really cost effective after you figure in all the extras you need to pay for.

My thesis is this; consumers will tend to absorb any price increases in gas as long as the almighty credit card is in their pocket. This situation is different than back in the 70’s. Credit is more readily available now and the stigma of having a huge credit card debt is less. I’d like to see a study on how credit card debt relates to gas prices.

— AJ
5:35 am June 19th, 2008

Pages: [1] 2 3 » Show All