Old opinions of Europe no longer apply — and don’t address the oil issue
I am responding to Joe Mattis’s (Crestwood) response of Joe Krugman’s article (May 26th):
Having traveled in Europe (leisure) for the past 20 some years I question his disdain. Having visited France, Germany, Great Britain and many other countries via a rental automobile & high speed trains. Two major cities, Paris & London, stand out as very efficient, clean, with superb public transportation and courtious residents. As far as expenseive it is only because the dollar has collasped that the cost has risen there in the last couple of years. Since the Republican party has been in the majority for the past seven years I find it odd that the GOP has not taken care of that little problem already. Do we have efficient mass transit all over the US, no. Only at a couple of our major cities. Do we have have high speed rail service all over the US, no. Why not you ask, because the majority of US citizens would rather consume all the oil (gasoline) it can in gas consuming SUV’s. Does one really think that by drilling for more oil is the answer, I think not. We would consume that new oil as fast as we could pump it out of the ground and be back in the same situation we are now in a short period of time. If we had an excess supply what do you think Exon-Mobile would do with it, export it to China & India of course.
Burke Campbell
Oakville




“Since the Republican party has been in the majority for the past seven years I find it odd that the GOP has not taken care of that little problem already.”
Perhaps you missed it what with all of your European travels, but the Democrats have been in control of Congress for a couple of years now. Perhaps you find it odd they’ve done nothing as well? Or perhaps you’re just another partisan looking to bash the other side?
If we need oil, we drill for it. We don’t demand that others stop using it. I suppose you didn’t use any oil in those long European trips, eh?