Web Search powered by YAHOO! SEARCH
06.30.2008 4:07 pm

Two clear facts: McCain is moderate, Obama is waaaay left

St. Louis Post-Dispatch

In this season of political uncertainty, at least two facts are clear to me: Sen. McCain is at heart a moderate, and Sen. Obama is the farthest to the left Presidential candidate we have seen since McGovern. I support McCain because he is on balance where I believe most Americans are, whether they know it or not. Obama, as is abundantly clear from his short political career, is not.

It is easy for Sen. Obama to promise glowing generalities, such as Universal Healthcare, which almost everyone finds attractive. But next cold January or February, President Obama will find the devil is in the details. Universal, comprehensive healthcare sounds great until a bureaucrat tells you that you must go to a doctor who is not the one you want, or that you can’t have the medicine or procedure you think you need, or that healthcare must be rationed.

It is my understanding that under the Canadian system, a woman with breast cancer may have to have chemo while on a six-month waiting list for surgery. Will that affect her outcome? Perhaps statistically not, but try convincing an American woman of that. In Germany, medical doctors don’t make any more than nurses, a German-educated MD told me. So the doctors under their healthcare system sometimes begin to just put their hours in and leave at 5:00. Try telling most Americans who have waited 2 or 3 hours that the doctor went home for supper and please come back tomorrow—-or a week or two from now.

These issues all came up when Sen. Hillary Clinton pushed her proposals in the 1990’s, and most Americans balked, on reflection As I recall someone saying, “If you like public housing, you’ll love public healthcare.” Something needs to be reformed, but Sen. and likely-President-to-be Obama owes us more than platitudes.

Soaking the “rich” has been a popular Democratic catch-phrase for decades. But who is rich depends to some extent on who is concerned. To the taxpayer, it is usually anyone making more than they do. To the Democratic Party, it seems to depend on whether the election is still pending or has already been decided. And to Sen. Obama, it is apparently all over the map, beginning at $200,000/year and descending to$100,000/year, then to $75,000/year—-and falling fast. In fact, it will fall as low as it needs to go to raise enough money to pay for new entitlements. Not that the Republicans have done any better in the fiscal binge; the Party of Economic Responsibility has been about as responsible as the proverbial intoxicated mariner.

Where does this leave us? Over my 45 years of political awareness, I have watched with dismay as both party’s activists marched to the Left and Right, respectively. But I believe the “center of gravity” of most Americans’ beliefs and values is overwhelmingly in the center of the political spectrum. And that’s why I trust and will vote for the moderate instead of the charismatic, articulate speaker of ultraliberal but ill-defined promises.

Gary J. Ehrhardt

Columbia, Mo.

1 Star2 Stars3 Stars4 Stars5 Stars (6 votes, average: 4.33 out of 5)
Loading ... Loading ...
48 comments

Comments are closed.

How much healthcare can $2 billion a week for 100 years provide?
If that’s the political center, count me out.

— Garrison
4:30 pm June 30th, 2008

Gary

Great letter.

Mrs. Garrison, your still an IDIOT.

— JD
4:39 pm June 30th, 2008

Let’s return, once again, to McCain’s flourishing flip-flop list, which is now a Top 11 list.

* McCain criticized TV preacher Jerry Falwell as “an agent of intolerance” in 2002, but has since decided to cozy up to the man who said Americans “deserved” the 9/11 attacks. (Indeed, McCain has now hired Falwell’s debate coach.)

* McCain used to oppose Bush’s tax cuts for the very wealthy, but he reversed course in February.

* In 2000, McCain accused Texas businessmen Sam and Charles Wyly of being corrupt, spending “dirty money” to help finance Bush’s presidential campaign. McCain not only filed a complaint against the Wylys for allegedly violating campaign finance law, he also lashed out at them publicly. In April, McCain reached out to the Wylys for support.

* McCain supported a major campaign-finance reform measure that bore his name. In June, he abandoned his own legislation.

* McCain used to think that Grover Norquist was a crook and a corrupt shill for dictators. Then McCain got serious about running for president and began to reconcile with Norquist.

* McCain took a firm line in opposition to torture, and then caved to White House demands.

* McCain gave up on his signature policy issue, campaign-finance reform, and won’t back the same provision he sponsored just a couple of years ago.

* McCain was against presidential candidates campaigning at Bob Jones University before he was for it.

* McCain was anti-ethanol. Now he’s pro-ethanol.

* McCain was both for and against state promotion of the Confederate flag.

* And now he’s both for and against overturning Roe v. Wade.

It’s not exactly a newsflash that McCain is veering ridiculously to the right in a rather shameless attempt to reinvent himself, but Dems should take advantage of the situation and help establish the narrative now. Despite his rather embarrassing record of late, we still have major media figures telling the public that “no one would accuse McCain of equivocating on anything

— Ed Beck
4:41 pm June 30th, 2008

In 1999, McCain was in New Hampshire, campaigning for the GOP nomination as a moderate. He proclaimed himself a pro-life candidate, but told reporters that “in the short term, or even the long term, I would not support repeal of Roe v. Wade.” He explained that overturning Roe would force “women in America to [undergo] illegal and dangerous operations.” Yesterday, campaigning for the GOP nomination as a conservative, McCain said the opposite.

STEPHANOPOULOS: Let me ask one question about abortion. Then I want to turn to Iraq. You’re for a constitutional amendment banning abortion, with some exceptions for life and rape and incest.

MCCAIN: Rape, incest and the life of the mother. Yes.

STEPHANOPOULOS: So is President Bush, yet that hasn’t advanced in the six years he’s been in office. What are you going to do to advance a constitutional amendment that President Bush hasn’t done?

MCCAIN: I don’t think a constitutional amendment is probably going to take place, but I do believe that it’s very likely or possible that the Supreme Court should — could overturn Roe v. Wade, which would then return these decisions to the states, which I support…. Just as I believe that the issue of gay marriage should be decided by the states, so do I believe that we would be better off by having Roe v. Wade return to the states.

The old McCain didn’t want an amendment and didn’t want Roe overturned. The new McCain completely disagrees with the old McCain.

It’s worth noting that politicians’ opinions on abortion can, and often do, “evolve” over time. Dick Gephardt and Al Gore, for example, both opposed abortion rights before eventually becoming pro-choice. With this in mind, McCain’s unexpected shift may simply reflect yet another pol whose thinking has changed over time.

Or, far more likely, McCain is once again abandoning any pretense of consistency and integrity, and is now willing to say literally anything to win.
Who is he? Maybe he’s ambidextrous!

— Ed Beck
4:45 pm June 30th, 2008

JD-zzzz zzzz zzzz

— slamfist
5:11 pm June 30th, 2008

Let’s return, once again, to Obama’s negatives.

Anti-American
Racist
Liar
Rev. Wright
Weather Underground William Aires
Michele not a proud American
Voted present 70% of the time in Il.
Wants a bigger Nanny State
Higher taxes on all
Clings to guns
Clings to religion
Universal Health
Tony Rezo
Far left wing
Flip Flop on campaign finance
Flip Flop lapel pin
Will not salute our flag
Will not drill for oil
No nuke power
Anti Military
Against handguns before he was for it
Piss poor judgement
Unfettered abortions
Most liberal voting record in senate

It’s not exactly a newsflash that Obama is veering ridiculously to the center in a rather shameless attempt to reinvent himself, and his wife.

— JD
5:46 pm June 30th, 2008

Prior to the Republican Congress and the Bush administration pulling the plug on VA hospitals, which includes reducing veterans benefits, the care given to our soldiers was the best in the world…Read (google) independent studies on the quality of government healthcare provided through the VA, to that of private [for-profit] insurance driven healthcare. The VA wins in every category….No veterans ever wait for 3 hours only to be told we close at 5 pm…..Don’t fall for misleading Republican scare tactics and insurance company bs.

Mr. Ehrhardt states: “universal healthcare sounds great until some bureaucrat tells you that you must go to a doctor who is not the one you want.” How selfishly Republican is that?….Convince the 50 million Americans who can’t see a doctor at all….or the additional 100 million Americans who are under-insured.

Pro-life, pro-family party… my canass.

— Garrison
6:29 pm June 30th, 2008

Garrison

A liberal idiot by any other name, is still a liberal idiot. YOU are that idiot.

— JD
6:39 pm June 30th, 2008

Mrs Garrison, even a dolt as dense as you knows there has been NO reduction in ANY VA program. NO government program EVER shrinks.

— Si Vis Pacem Para Bellum
6:47 pm June 30th, 2008

Forgot one:

Obama was against FISA, before he was for it.

— JD
6:50 pm June 30th, 2008

Pages: [1] 2 3 4 5 » Show All