Web Search powered by YAHOO! SEARCH
07.02.2008 1:38 pm

Well, look who’s driving us to the poor house

St. Louis Post-Dispatch

The shocking story behind the latest auto plant closings is that General Motors already had an electric car in production 20 years ago but chose to shred them.  In response to California’s clean air standards, GM leased its EV 1 (electric vehicle 1) to drivers there who wanted an efficient, non-polluting means of transportation.  When California relaxed its air quality standards, GM demanded that all the EV1’s be returned to them as the leases expired.  Drivers who loved that car demonstrated against the recall to no avail.  All the cars were shredded, yes shredded !  Even the ones that hadn’t been driven yet.  Why?  That’s the question explored in a 2006 documentary called “Who Killed the Electric Car?” (www.whokilledtheelectriccarmovie.com)

The saddest part of this story is that American auto plants could have been producing hybrids years ahead of foreign competitors but chose not to.  Americans are now clamoring for more drilling, more gas, more pollution and blaming the environmentalists for the crisis we find ourselves in.  What they don’t realize is that unregulated capitalism is at the heart of today’s problems, not the makers of hybrid cars.  The goal of a capitalist enterprise is to make as much profit as possible.  Oil companies do not concern themselves with the damage to working class families caused by high gas prices.  They are not social workers; they are out for the largest CEO bonuses and stock prices  That’s the bottom line.  We are reaping what was sowed in the 1980’s with the union busting and deregulation frenzy.  We got “government off our backs,” and now the oil companies are driving us to the poor house.

Susan Cunningham

Pacific

1 Star2 Stars3 Stars4 Stars5 Stars (7 votes, average: 3.86 out of 5)
Loading ... Loading ...
15 comments

Comments are closed.

Susan, how would you suggest we make the electricity for all these electric cars?

— Si Vis Pacem Para Bellum
1:57 pm July 2nd, 2008

Unregulated capitalism? Susan, have you ever heard of OSHA, SOXA (Sarbanes/Oxley), EPA, NLRB, NAFTA, CAFE, IRS, HHS, DOT, DOE, FAA, FCC, or any of the other bureaucrat nests that manipulate commerce and regulate business and industry? Take some time from your leftist websites and try to form an investor pool and start up a medium size company anywhere in the USA. Then come back and tell us about “unregulated capitalism.” You are correct, however, that we are reaping what we’ve sown. Welcome to the Great Society, lady.

— A#
2:45 pm July 2nd, 2008

Once again, para bellum makes a silly comment…

An electric car would charge overnight, using about 8kwh of electricity (according to figures about the upcoming Chevy Volt). This is about 40-70 cents per day, using AmerenUE rates. Changing one 100w incandescent light bulb (used 5 hours/day) to a 23w CFL saves .39kwh of electricity per day, so 5 light bulbs save about 2kwh per day. Setting your AC 2 degrees warmer can save about 2kwh per day. A solar shingle covered 1200ft2 home can produce 4-5kwh of electricity per day. A small vertical axis wind turbine can produce 5-10kwh per day.

So maybe we’ll need approximately ZERO additional power plants to power these electric cars!

— mombo
3:05 pm July 2nd, 2008

Let all take a right turn back to reality.

And it that does not work, lets just put on some red shoes and click our heels twice, that always seems to work in the movies.

— havetolaugh
3:57 pm July 2nd, 2008

mombo-

Yeah, right! just like we need no new refineries and no drilling to meet our oil needs.

— tim jones
4:57 pm July 2nd, 2008

Susan is obsolutely right. The only thing needed was manufactures for the electrical battery systems. Our existing electricity coulds handle the Plug-in Hybrids with no problems, Si.

— D. Walker
6:04 pm July 2nd, 2008

Given GM missed the boat on this technologies, maybe a foreign country will
make these for us and sell them to us!!

Oh, wait, I think that’s already in the pipeline. Now, what did someone say regarding GM’s stock price in 7/2008??

Of course, the irony of A#’s comments is the inability of American corporations to have any anticipation of the times we are now in. This can be called ‘a failure of the marketplace’. This is not a construct of ‘leftist’ websites. This is what you sow from dumb corporate capitalism.

By the by, A#, I’m no leftist; I’m just watching Rome burn, and I’m carrying binoculars.

— A-German-in-1937
6:39 pm July 2nd, 2008

Susan,

You seem to be anti-capitalism. What is there about socialism that you find so appealing? Is it the low standard of living? The crushing taxation? The lack of personal freedom?

Actually, the goal of “Big Oil” companies is to earn a decent return on investment for their stockholders. If you participate ina 401(k), pension fund, or mutual fund, you may well be part owner of one or more of these corporations.

Are you aware that the US government makes far more on each gallon of gasoline than any of the oil companies? And it doesn’t supply a single drop of fuel, dig a single well, or risk a dime of its own money.

As far as supplying hybrid cars, the simple answer is basic economics. If oil is $40/barrel, why spend tens of millions of dollars developing cars with limited range, questionable reliability, and that require a subsidy in order to compete price-wise with their gasoline-powered counterparts? Automakers have to sell large numbers of vehicles to make them cost effective, and the small number of EV-1s produced for the People’s Republic of California didn’t fit the bill.

The reason Americans are blaming environmentalists for our current situation is because it is the truth. Enviro-wackos villified the nuclear power industry, blocked oil exploration in the most promising areas in the country, and screamed that coal was too dirty a fuel source. All the while, they don’t have any problems with Russia, Saudi Arabia, China, etc, etc, exploiting the environment in order to extract the oil and selling it at today’s volatile prices.

— MercMan
8:55 pm July 2nd, 2008

What a joke that people think that these corporate CEO’s deserve those extreme salaries. Now is this what one considers the beauty of capitalism, stock holders and employees being ripped off by board members and CEO’s?

The worst part is they are also rewarded after they have run the company into the ground with extreme packages and ungodly millions for performing poorly. Yea, that’s capitalism today.

— D. Walker
10:57 pm July 2nd, 2008

Walker,

You seem to forget that those CEO salaries are set by the company owners, the stock holders. Do you participate in a retirement plan or a 401K? If so you are probably an owner of some of that stock. So, tell me again, who is to blame?

— James R
5:52 am July 3rd, 2008

Pages: [1] 2 » Show All