The problem in America is health care, not medical malpractice
There is no credible information that doctors have “fled” the Metro East area due to spiraling med mal rates. Doctors still provide essential medical services there, and I have yet to see any study which lists any doctors by name and area of practice which have actually left their practice or an area where they had practiced due to increases in insurance rates. Underlying all this is an attempt by insurers to extort draconian changes in the protections consumers have from the carelessness of medical professionals. The best cure for suits due to medical carelessness is scrupulously following established procedures and practicing good medicine.There was a study several years ago in JAMA which showed that there were some 50,000 preventable deaths each year due to bad health practices (failure to wash hands, etc.) in hospitals. So, each year we lose a number of patients nearly equal to the all the deaths in combat in the Vietnam War are lost due to medical carelessness, and we still hear about the poor doctors and their insurance rates. I propose we prosecute these deaths criminally for involuntary manslaughter, which in Missouri is “recklessly causing the death of another.” The standard is whether the conduct of the accused “grossly deviated from what was reasonable under the circumstances.”Aside from attacking those injured by the doctors’ carelessness, doctors could also form groups which could collectively bargain for lower rates from insurers. If the overwhelming number of doctors who practice exemplary medicine brought themselves together, and excluded from the group the some 5% of them which cause over 50% of claims, their rates could go down. The laws which had prevented this practice were repealed in federal legislation in 1985. The doctors could also form risk retention groups, similar to insurance companies, which the doctors use their collective abilities to self-insure and provide an alternative to the nearly monopolistic and capricious regular medical malpractice insurance market. The same law which repealed the “anti-group” laws in states allows doctors a form of self-insurance pools. Other states have taken measures to support doctors’ in paying for needed insurance coverage by various pools, insurance plans and incentives.We have a problem in America, it’s not a problem related to the meritorious suits filed by consumers injured through the carelessness of others. The problem is an insurance problem. The insurers have for too long been able to stick it to doctors and consumers, and its time that the legislatures in the various states and the Congress put a stop to abusive and improper insurance practices.
Timothy E. Hogan
Des Peres


“…50,000 preventable deaths each year due to bad health practices (failure to wash hands, etc.) in hospitals.”
This is quite a bit higher that accidental gun deaths but I don’t hear liberals wanting to ban doctors or hospitals.
If insurers are going to practice medicine by denying treatments, then they should of course be responsible for their actions.
Mr Hogan hasn’t the slightest idea he’s yapping about.
http://aspe.hhs.gov/daltcp/reports/medliab.htm
http://www.house.gov/list/press/il10_kirk/pr040510.html
http://www.consciouschoice.com/2004/cc1711/birthcrisis1711.html
http://pt.wkhealth.com/pt/re/ajog/abstract.00000447-200406000-00008.htm;jsessionid=LnTpN9s2BZ8fFypydf9mDsnQ073jYGBJvMrvpm1xkF2LNmJrTC68!526656812!181195628!8091!-1
When I saw Hogan’s name at the top of my P-D Commentary page this morning I for sure thought it was his public apology to me for supporting Edwards and then taking me to task for saying Edwards was having an affair with the mother of his illegitimate child. Certainly I was a lying fascist. Still waiting for the apology Tim.
I agree with Go-Fish. Hogan never gets his facts right.
While I agree in principle to the idea of limiting compensation for non-economic (pain-and-suffering) damages, the case that the “Office of the Assistant Secretary for Planning and Evaluation” makes that “the litigation system is responsible” seems like a pretty big leap of faith. It has not quantified the total compensation for malpractice claims made by insurers vs. payment made for various services.
e.g. if malpractice claims amounted to $100 million in Missouri compared to a billion in health care costs, we haven’t solved the problem of rising health care costs one bit, have we ?
Health care spending in the United States is estimated to have been $2.2 trillion in 2007.
http://www.anthem.com/agent/noapplication/f5/s1/t0/pw_005779.pdf
In contrast, total payouts for malpractice in 2007 was $3.7 billion.
http://www.statehealthfacts.kff.org/comparetable.jsp?ind=437&cat=8&sub=102&yr=18&typ=4&o=a
In other words, malpractice claims amounted to a mere 1.7% of the total health care spending in this country. I have no problem problem looking at that problem, but need to put it in perspective so that we have no illusions as to what effect it will have on the final cost.
A lot of this could be fixed with a “loser pays” court system.