Leonard Pitts article talking around this terrorism and freedom is convoluted. First of all I value the safety President Bush did provide this country and there is nothing leftist/liberals can do to diminish that major accomplishment of protection. Pitts like the rest of the media is really setting the stage to excuse Obama for the next terrorist attack—oh wait they are not terrorists are they Pitts— no to Obama and the Democrats they are “freedom fighters”.
 
Speaking of which Pitts wants  ”freedom and then security” or is his wish freedom or security. That is like his ”non-sequitor dressed up as logic”—accusation against Cheney’s condemnation of Obama’s fuzzy headed offers to negotiate with the 2 Crazies from N. Korea and Iran. It seems both have put Obama in his place telling he and the world to stuff it. Obama does not have the sense to be embarassed by their out of hand rejection of his kiss-up to them with his offers to negotiate without pre-conditions. That was really just liberal continuation of trying to denigrate President Bush’s style of placing them in an axis of evil.
 
Pitts is also trying to re-write history. Clinton provided no safety to this country whatsoever. Had he gone after bin Laden after the first World Trade Center bombing there would not have been the second 9/11 disaster. But Clinton was either too cowardly or too busy bedding 21 year old interns to go after that “freedom fighter”
 
No thanks Pitts, I will place my safety and freedom in the hands of Republicans any day over liberal Democrats. We will see what the American public thinks when the next “freedom fighters” sneak their bomb across the Mexican border under cover of a bunch of illegals. I just hope they place the bomb under Pitt’s sorry butt and not my sorry butt.
 
Ron Jones
Alton