Web Search powered by YAHOO! SEARCH
09.08.2009 5:55 pm

Cap-and-trade is not the answer

St. Louis Post-Dispatch
  • Email this
  • Print this
 
Dan Dileo does not take everything into account when talking about a cleaner economy.  The 36,000 (construction) jobs he thinks this will create is a drop in the bucket compared to the jobs it will displace to other countries.  To replace one 600 mega-watt coal fired power plant would take 400 wind turbines at 1.5 mega-watts each.  It takes about one hundred employees to run and maintain a 600 MW coal-fired power plant.  How many do you think it will take for the wind turbines?  Now start counting the other jobs that support the coal-fired power plant that are not direct employees.  These 400 wind turbines require 10,000 acres of ground to build the wind turbines as it takes 25 acres for each turbine.  Now you need transmission lines to these new wind turbines to get the power to the grid, let alone hoping the wind blows all the time so everyone can have electricity when needed.  The other problem is getting every country to do the same.  Without China and India buying into reducing CO2, we are merely putting the USA at a bigger disadvantage when it comes to jobs and market for products.  At the rate China and India are building coal-fired power plants, it does not matter what we do when concerning CO2 emissions.  I can agree we should try to do our part.  But, this should be done through replacement of power plants as they are phased out due to age.  We do not need to shut them down just to limit CO2 and watch our cost of electricity increase as much as 70%.  Thus increasing the cost of every manufactured item.  Sen. Claire McCaskill does have an obligation to watch out for the good of this state and the country.  The cap and trade bill (Markey-Waxman) is not the answer and Sen. McCaskill should not support it.  She should work to enact a bill that will be fair and realistic to all in this country.
 
Robert Schweizer
Sikeston
12 comments

Comments are closed.

A farmer’s crop fails, neighbors convince him that this ugly old hag – that they long have hated – has been muttering spells on him; she’s a witch. Eventually, you have a mob rounding up suspects and burning them, in the name of agriculture and food supply. They become more brutal and efficient, and keep finding more witches to burn. Like those that toss virgins into volcanoes, they never question the validity of their original [bizarre] hypothesis – just get on with the corrective action!

At least with the primitive [past] dictators of sacrifice, their death roles were relatively low in quantity. I’m not confident that their contemporaries will be so constrained.

— egoist
7:55 pm September 8th, 2009

Robert,
Great points! Without the rest of the world going along, we would be screwed if cap and trade should pass, which it won’t. I drive the I 55 corridor every weekend and I can see exactly 1 (one) windfarm. It’s about 100 miles south of Chicago. Although wind and solar are a part of the equation, so is exploitation of our existing resources. This is a combined effort.

— budb1969
8:06 pm September 8th, 2009

Cap and tax must fail! It will only put the USA at a major global disadvantage.

— Bhstlmo
4:34 am September 9th, 2009

Even liberals can’t defend this utter stupidity! This bill alone shows just how little the liberals care about anything except raising taxes. They also depend on the ignorance of their own voters to allow this to go through without any resistance. This is only about higher taxes and more control over each and every one of us! Of course, liberals like that!

— superdave
6:16 am September 9th, 2009

— budb1969
“I drive the I 55 corridor every weekend and I can see exactly 1 (one) windfarm. It’s about 100 miles south of Chicago.”
.
Recently I saw huge windfarms near Rockford IL on I-39 and several others about halfway between Minneapolis and Des Moines on I-35. Click on the map at the link below and you’ll see their status throughout the USA. Keep clicking around on this site as there is a lot of fascinating info.
http://www.awea.org/projects/
The letter writers claims an outrageous land requirement of 25 acres / megawatt. Actually it’s about 2 acres/megawatt in hilly terrain, while still eliminating only about 3 acres from use when installed in open flat terrain. Hyperbole like that in the letter just kills the author’s credibility as it reveals his agenda.

— STL
9:25 am September 9th, 2009

STL,
Don’t get me wrong, the one on I 55 is huge. I have no problems with that. I think it’s great that wind farms are becoming more frequent.

— budb1969
1:49 pm September 9th, 2009

Mr. Schweitzer, Thanks for the repeat of the GOP talking points!

So, we should go on destroying the environment because others are destroying the environment?

There has been no attempt by the right to come up with any alternative bill, no alternative methods of production nor any comprehensive effort at energy conservation.

“Drill baby, drill” means nothing when we use almost 30% of the world’s energy and our reserves, all of them, are less than 6% of that. Where do we get the other 24% of the energy we need?

When our children and grandchildren look at what we did or did not do when confronted with this problem, do you really believe “more of the same” is going to make them feel we did the right thing?

— Tim Hogan
3:17 pm September 9th, 2009

Timbo,

After oil we get the rest through solar, wind, hydro, nuclear, and coal. We don’t eliminate any source but, you and the other liberals just continue to say no to oil, coal, and nuclear knowing solar, wind, and hydro will never meet our needs. Heck Timbo, even France uses nuclear energy.

Many countries are drilling off the coast of Florida, but not the US. Why? People in California complain about the cost of gas but they don’t want to build any new refineries or drill off their coasts. (Of course they are more than willing to use oil pumped from Alaska. All sources combined will give us enough energy to sell our excess to other countries.

You know, both political parties state they want energy independence. If both parties want it, why don’t we have it? Could it be the politicians are not telling us the whole truth?

— James R
4:29 pm September 9th, 2009

James R, you are absolutely on target. The sheeple buy their garbage too. I give credit to that stupidity to the government educational industry that doesnt educate but more indoctrinates. There is plenty of oil and much of it here is in the United States. However, you have these idiotic green jobs advocates promising millions of jobs. Doing what? They cant tell you. They promise but they cant do it. If that was so, then why arent we having an employment hiring bonanza?

— superdave
5:44 pm September 9th, 2009

Finally some common sense from a clear thinking individual.
I say Up-With-Dan-DiLeo!
He obviously brings some refreshing ideas to the narrow-minded St. Louis way of thinking.
Does this sound familiar, Mr. Schweizer?
“Some men see things as they are and say why. I dream things that never were and say why not.” That’s right… the famous quote from Robert Kennedy.
Dan DiLeo suggests that we set the example for the rest of the world and lead the way as America has always been known to do.
I also invite Senator McCaskill to get behind Dan’s rock-solid thinking and continue to challenge ourselves to look for a better way.
We owe at least that much to our own children and those around the world.

— IWantMySay
9:10 pm September 9th, 2009

Pages: [1] 2 » Show All