Why the blackout on news about Clinton’s failure with Russia?
I understand Ms. Clinton recently agreed to a unilateral agreement to allow the Russian military to inspect our most secret nuclear sites to count these weapons etc. What do we get in return? Putin will not agree with Hilary to sanctions against Iran’s nuke ambitions, but we will roll over for the Russians?
Thursday’s P/D wastes front page ink on Limbaugh’s lost Ram’s bid, the Dow index passing 10,000, El-Amin’s corruption, fencing sport articles, and “public option” snags. But, not a peep regarding allowing a nation that history shows us is not our friend, and can never be trusted being shown our most secret military sites, weapons, AND LOCATIONS!
Unless I am missing it, I cannot find any mention of this anywhere in the paper. You didn’t even bury it in the want ads. My problem with your paper is not only what you choose to tell your readers, BUT, WHAT YOU CHOOSE TO NOT TELL US. And you may wonder why your readership and subscriber’s continue to drop off.
Ronald D. Smith
Lake St. Louis


I think the US is prep’ing for a fire sale to our debt holders - you know, so they can see the goods before they re-po them.
As for the Post, and the rest of them, I like what Glenn Reynolds says - “Legacy Media”.
Ron, according to the latest logic from the lib-socialists, it would be racist to point out any failures of the Obama admin. In fact, any criticism at all is racist. So the PD is just towing the politically correct line.
Ronald,
Because the Democrats are over a barrel! The MSM can’t report ANY controversy associated with Mrs. Clinton. After coming to grips with the shortfalls of President Obama they realize they may have to run Mrs. Clinton out there as the next Democrat nominee in 2012. I know she said she would not run, the question is do we belive her?
Um … uh … could it be because the negotiations are not complete ?
http://www.google.com/hostednews/afp/article/ALeqM5gm3ejArE3VvjFWWO9Vzl5vg0rM0A
Could it be, Ronald D. Smith, that you spend all your time listening to paranoid wingnut radio?
Maybe a little research before you prove your foolishness would inform you that these negotiations are, at best, preliminary.
It was front page news at the Globe-Democrat. wacko