Web Search powered by YAHOO! SEARCH
07.25.2008 6:14 pm

Devilution, evolution, whatever. Can we claim moral high ground and stand tall?

St. Louis Post-Dispatch

 I have been reading letters written  by Christians in response to the “Devilution” editorial. It is interesting that supporters of  “Intelligent Design” are at one and the same time deceitful and delusional. They are deceitful in that they are trying…

  • Comments (15)
  • Email this
07.23.2008 5:21 pm

Evolutionists use adaptive or variational changes to bolster their theory

St. Louis Post-Dispatch

Thursday’s editorial entitle “Devolution” is just another of the Post’s many instances of writing about something they know little about. Evolution as defined by the article, small changes over long periods of time, is totally uncontroversial. Everyone believes that, even…

  • Comments (15)
  • Email this
05.07.2008 12:29 pm

Intelligent design fails to meet the most basic requirements of legitimate science

St. Louis Post-Dispatch

Mark Lasseigne’s letter to the editor (May 4), in which he simply denied that the T-Rex was related to the chicken on the basis of his perception of “complexity,” was loaded with factual errors. Mr. Lasseigne is wrong to assert…

  • Comments (9)
  • Email this
05.05.2008 12:17 pm

Science will flourish only in an atmosphere of liberty

St. Louis Post-Dispatch

This letter is in response to  “Tastes like…chicken” in the April 27 issue. It’s important to remember that whenever an editorial writer presents a piece about science, it is not about science. Rather it was a defense of established authority…

  • Comments (25)
  • Email this
01.16.2008 4:11 pm

Debating the ’scientific’ merit of intelligent design theory

St. Louis Post-Dispatch

A number of the letters that were written in response to your January 7 editorial entitled “Science and God” have expressed opinions compatible with that of Jacob Layer, who stated in his letter of January 10 that, “The theory of…

  • Comments (39)
  • Email this