Is the Jackman re-signing a good move?
The Blues have been faced with an interesting dilemma heading into Tuesday’s NHL trade deadline.
The club has two of their most durable defensemen ready to hit the free-agency market in Barret Jackman and Bryce Salvador.
Should the Blues re-sign one or both of them and leave the club with limited wiggle room to sign offensive help? Or should the Blues trade Jackman and/or Salvador and begin to work in some of their young defensive talent . . . such as Erik Johnson, Roman Polak, Steve Wagner and Jeff Woywitka?
Well, the Blues gave at least part of their answer with Monday night’s re-signing of Jackman to a multi-year contract extension. By giving Jackman a four-year deal that likely averages somewhere near $3.5 annually, the Blues are telling us that they will continue to rebuild the team with a defense-first mentality.
“He’s a lifer . . . he’s a Blues,” team president John Davidson said. ”He’s a person that can obviously give us some minutes, kills penalties. He has seen some power-play time. He’s got a presence. There was some legitimate interest in him throughout the league. But with us going forward, he’s a person we wanted in our lineup. He’s young and he’s got upside. He’s going to become a better player than he is already.”
The Blues were in a peculiar spot with Jackman. If they could pick two or three defensemen to start their team, he would be one of them. However, the Blues are in a bind with the $8 million left on Jay McKee’s contract, and the $3.4 million owed to Christian Backman next season.
So while they wanted to bring Jackman back, his situation presented the Blues one of their only opportunities to trade defense for offense.
Some fans will probably like the signing because it keeps intact the Blues’ defensive depth and brings back a fan favorite. But others are probably wondering where the club will go for scoring now that they’ve once again invested heavily on a blue-liner.
The Blues have nearly 39 percent of their payroll invested in defensemen this season, which is among the top-five highest percentages in the NHL for that position.
Meanwhile, they are are 27th in the league in goals this season with 159. They were 28th last season with 201. The club needs 42 goals in the final 20 games to match last year’s anemic total.
The Blues are 29th in the league on the power play this season, converting 14 percent. They were 29th last year at 12.1 percent.
The Blues had 85 shots on goal during their three-game road trip to Los Angeles, Anaheim and Phoenix and mustered just two goals. They were shutout Sunday against the Coyotes on 35 shots.
In the midst of a tight playoff race this month, the Blues have allowed two goals or fewer in eight of their last nine games. But they are 4-2-3 in that stretch.
The Blues need goals in a bad way.
JD will tell you that they expect more goals next year from a number of players. But that’s wishful thinking at this point.
Can the Blues find a player before the 2 p.m. trading deadline who can help them? Or will the team wait until the offseason to look for offensive help. Either way, scoring needs to be addressed.
JR
Janssen is the same thing as DJ King. A fighter with no offensive upside. This guy probably will be a healthy scratch most nights, which leaves me scratching my head on this trade. To answer your question, no he is not worth more than a bag of pucks.
Jannsen has ONE goal in the NHL and has not even played an NHL game this year. How does this move even make sense? I would understand if he was a prospect with a future but it looks like he has done nothing since he was drafted in 2002. A draft pick would have been a much better return in my opinion. I suppose JD knows what he is doing but it is hard to see. Any input JR?
Not 100% thriiled with the Jackman extension but he’s a tough-as-nails competitor. I’m encouraged with the direction the team is headed however some comments made by Blues management and local media blogs puzzle me. JD states: “…there are more offensive players coming to our team. David Perron will get better … T.J. Oshie will be here, Patrik Berglund possibly. Erik Johnson will add more. That’s way we look at it.” So here’s the look ahead…we ‘currently’ have Jackman, McKee, Backman, Brewer, Johnson, Salvador (and Walker) on the blue line with Woywitka, Wagner and Polak being pegged as the future. Something has got to give. And with respect to Perron, Oshie, Stastny and Berglund up front…who is Blues management going to move in 08/09 to give these guys a chance (as Murray plays them for only 10 minutes a game–if they aren’t a healthy scratch)? Again I’m encouraged by the future but because of the number and quality of young talent in the system, the opportunities simply don’t exist for the immediate future (08-09) despite what we hear from Blues and local media. But what a nice problem to have! Go Blues!!
If they want people to stop showing up for games the Salvador for Jannsen trade ought to help. Let me see thay need goal scoring more than anything and they trade a steady defenseman for an enforcer?? That isn’t even playing?? Even if Jannsen becomes a steady presence he’s not going score goals. I guess some of the healthy scratches will get more ice time - while I scratch my head over this one. C’mon Blues use your strength to overcome your weakness; don’t just give your strength away.
Anytime Lou wants your defenseman, keep him. The guy knows defense.
I’m sick of Davidson and Larry P.
Davidson says in todays Paper “You know how hard it is to find a scorer? They’re not out there.” Then right above the quote I had just read. FLYERS: Acquire high-scoring forward Vaclav Prospal in a trade with Tampa Bay for minor league defenseman and a conditional pick in 2009 draft. WHAT???? We didn’t have that?
Let me guess, John and Larry wanted to bring back the painful memories of New Jersey basically stealing a Cup from us, so they trade a solid 3/4 defenseman for a guy who would be lucky to make our fourth line??? How is Cam helping us build for the future?
I thought the compensation for the Scott Stevens trade was over? Apparently not……
Brain cramps have set in a 14th and Clark again.
Hopes were so high going in to this year. We weren’t going to win the Cup, but making the playoffs looked like a lock. After some early mis-steps, Mr. Checkets and JD were hitting all the right notes to bring back fans and make hockey in St.Louis exciting again. It was a good time to be a Blues fan.
A disastrous January and the Blues can’t score, will require a miracle to make the playoffs, they raise ticket prices, and we deal a solid stay at home defenseman for an “enforcer” with St. Louis connections. St. Louis fans may love this kind of player (can you say “Twist and Chase”) but you don’t win with them.
I am more depressed about the Blues prospects now than I was at the end of the ‘05-’06 season.
I’m not thrilled about the trade either, but it does free up some salary space for a free agent signing this offseason.
How can you trade a good quality defensemen for some who seems like is hurt and does not help our scoring at all???? I agree that we should of just kept him with the team through the year because we got pretty much nothing for him in return anyways. BAD MOVE