Web Search powered by YAHOO! SEARCH
12.04.2007 6:08 pm

Rethinking the reassessment process

St. Louis Post-Dispatch

The property-tax reassessment process has caused plenty of outrage in St. Louis County, where total residential assesments rose 22 percent this year. It’s fast becoming a statewide issue, with House Speaker Rod Jetton recently appointing a task force to study assessment changes.

Thousands of homeowners would agree that there has to be a better way to update property values, and  David Stokes of the Show-Me Institute has a simple suggestion. Instead of  reassessing each property individually, he says, officials should calculate  how much property values have risen countywide, and then apply that percentage increase to each individual property.

It would certainly be simpler, and arguably more fair,  Stokes says:

 This would eliminate wide discrepancies from house to house that undermine faith in the current system. These individual discrepancies are common even in places where the aggregate accuracy of the assessments is high, such as Saint Louis County. Furthermore, the savings from no longer paying so many assessors would be substantial.

Stokes would retain the appeal process, offering potential relief for anyone who thinks their property hasn’t appreciated as much as the countywide average. When a property is sold, he also would continue to update assessments to reflect the exact market value. He explains:

This would safeguard against incorrectly undervaluing properties — particularly expensive ones — which might be underassessed over time by the use of an average-based system.

This idea wouldn’t eliminate the “tax increases by reassessment” that many residents are screaming about. But it would end “drive-by” assessments and the confusing use of “comparable” sales that sometimes aren’t really comparable. For most homeowners, that would be a step in the right direction.

1 Star2 Stars3 Stars4 Stars5 Stars (No Ratings Yet)
Loading ... Loading ...
3 comments

Comments are closed.

Why, exactly, do we need to reassess property every 2 years? The present system penalizes long-time residents who have remained in their neighborhoods rather than run off to newer, greener pastures.

It’s absurd that the argument is no longer WHETHER taxes should be raised, but rather how BEST to raise taxes. How about we force these lilly-livered politicians to stand up and vote on the record when they want to raise taxes? Dreaming up extra-constitutional ways to fleece the public is a disgrace.

Unfortunately, the appetite of politicians for more of someone else’s money is never satisfied.

— MercMan
7:53 pm December 4th, 2007

Regardless of the merits or lack thereof in this particular discussion, why, oh why, do we have to rely on the Republican-funded think tank called the Show-Me Institute, for research and insight? If only to relieve the monotony, David should consider using some other resources. I can only conclude that either he has some connection to Mr. Sinquefield’s front group, is in nearly total accord with its laissez-faire capitalist approach, or only has time to visit their web-site. A visit to the Show-Me Institute is rather instructive. Their directors are mostly male, mostly pale, and, in my opinion, always stale defenders of the Friedman/Chicago School of Economics, which is the educational facade of the super-rich in our beloved country. Wake up, David and Wake up, America!

— whiterosesociety
7:45 pm December 5th, 2007

In response to the first poster, I just want to clarify that my article was limited to the assessment system, not the tax rates that come out of that system. I agree that the manner in which reassessment currently leads to tax increases needs to be changed, but that is a topic for a seperate article.

— David Stokes
4:08 pm December 6th, 2007