Web Search powered by YAHOO! SEARCH
05.14.2008 11:19 am

Fun with numbers, or how up equals down in gasoline prices

St. Louis Post-Dispatch

Anyone who’s filled up their tank recently may have trouble believing the latest Consumer Price Index report from the Labor Department. It says:

In April,  the index for petroleum-based energy fell 1.6 percent, offsetting a 2.5  percent increase in the index for energy services.

Wait a minute. Petroleum was down? Didn’t gasoline prices just hit a record high? The Associated Press explains:

Since gasoline prices normally rise significantly in April, the 5.6 percent rise in prices for the month turned into a 2 percent drop after the government adjusted for normal seasonal changes.

So it’s all in the timing. If gasoline had hit $3.70 a gallon (the price in my neighborhood this morning) in January, it would have been a huge contributor to inflation. If it stays there in October, it will also be a huge contributor. But because it was April, it actually made inflation look tame.

The AP says today’s report “should ease concerns at the Federal Reserve that the sharp increase in food and energy prices this year would lead to broader inflation problems.” I hope that, instead, the Fed treats this reading with a giant dose of skepticism.

1 Star2 Stars3 Stars4 Stars5 Stars (1 votes, average: 4 out of 5)
Loading ... Loading ...
4 comments

Comments are closed.

By the end of the summer, something will have happened to produce a lower equilibrium price in the market for motor fuels. I’m not sure whether that will be a reduction in demand or an increase in supply. But clearly, the current price is producing difficulties elsewhere in the economy. Possible factors include:

* Reduction in demand as people alter their driving habits.
* Reduction in demand if shipping moves from truck to rail.
* Reduction in demand if airline traffic drops enough to drive route reductions.
* Increase in supply due to a variety of international factors.
* Increase in supply (unlikely) if Congress agrees to move forward with developing domestic petroleum resources.

The only push in the other direction would be if Congress suspends the federal gasoline tax this summer. Dumb, counter-productive move.

— Nick Kasoff
12:17 pm May 14th, 2008

Recession and inflation are back. Ignore doom and gloom but face the reality. The economy is or should be job ONE of the next President… the first day in office.

The U.S. economy is being stressed and inflation is back. The challenge for the Next President is to make the economy the foremost priority.

http://pacificgatepost.blogspot.com/2008/05/44th-president-your-first-challenge.html

It is being all but ignored by the current administration and Congress.

— PacificGatePost
1:38 pm May 14th, 2008

It illustrates that short term variations in practically anything don’t say much about long term trends.

The long term trend in oil prices is determined by international supply and demand conditions and will continue to go up despite occasional short term periods of stability or decline. These may be brought about by such relatively futile, short-term measures as releasing oil from the Strategic Petroleum Reserve or opening all of Alaska to production. In the intermediate term, the U.S. (and the rest of the industrialized world except for Russia) is stuck on its dependence on Middle East Oil, and so it is crucial to the world economy that that region be policed by the U.S. to prevent total chaos there.

In the longer term, the U.S. needs to develop alternative energy, probably based primarily on nuclear electric plants producing hydrogen that is then converted to synthetic gasoline. And American consumers had better quit believing in politicians of both parties promising them relief from high fuel prices, and start modifying their own lifestyles to reduce their energy costs, because the days of cheap gasoline are OVER for good.

— Ted44
8:09 am May 15th, 2008

Shake hands with beef.

— Anyone with a working brain
12:31 pm May 16th, 2008