Web Search powered by YAHOO! SEARCH
07.15.2008 2:45 pm

Warner, Whitacre reportedly joined Busch in talks

St. Louis Post-Dispatch

In Sunday’s column, I speculated that Anheuser-Busch director Ed Whitacre may have helped push A-B to do a friendly deal with InBev. Now the Financial Times is reporting that Whitacre, along with fellow director Douglas Warner III, did indeed play a key role in talks last week.

The FT says that Warner, a former chairman of JP Morgan Chase, and Whitacre, the retired chief executive of AT&T, joined August Busch IV last Tuesday on a call with  InBev CEO Carlos Brito and two InBev directors. Here’s how the London newspaper describes the conversation and what happened afterward:

Mr Warner and Mr Whitacre initially did most of the talking. They told InBev’s executives that while Anheuser’s board felt $65 a share was inadequate, they had deliberately refrained from enacting a poison pill anti-takeover provision or using scorched-earth tactics to thwart a bid.

Mr Warner and Mr Whitacre told Mr Brito that they were willing to listen, ahead of an Anheuser board call on Wednesday evening, to what InBev might have to offer. …

On Wednesday, ahead of the Anheuser board meeting, Mr Busch and Mr Warner again spoke with Mr Brito and InBev’s other representatives, this time also including chairman Peter Harf.

It was during that Wednesday call that InBev raised its offer to $70 a share, and, as we now know, things moved quickly after that.

1 Star2 Stars3 Stars4 Stars5 Stars (No Ratings Yet)
Loading ... Loading ...
6 comments

Comments are closed.

The board sold out. Brito would have payed 90 a share.If not, take a hike. Should have done deal for Modello,and stayed independent.Inbev needed A_Busch. I guess Whitacre and Warner have some free time now since there is no more A-Busch board
Thanks for nothing.John

— John Newman
11:56 am July 16th, 2008

AB had the poision pill ready to go on that conference call on Tuesday. They basically threatened Brito with the rest of the purchase of Modelo (deal was on the table and all the board had to do was sign it, that is why they meet on July 7 and why a call was made to Brito) to kill the deal, this is what caused Brito to cough up the extra $5. If he had not raised the bid to $70 the board would have approve the purchase of Modelo on that Wednesday evening board call.
The board did not immediately sign off on the remaining 50% purchase of Modelo because they knew the law suits would fly at them personally and they did not want to risk their personal wealth so they twisted the arm of Brito and he said Uncle!
They (board) basically sold out the Busch’s, the employees, the charities, the city and many others for the almighty buck/euro.
Please report how much each board memeber gained financially from the sale?

— kdunlap
2:12 pm July 16th, 2008

Like i’ve said before i’m a thirty year employee.I want us all company and hourly to walk out the door.Let brito run it.I am one sore loser,and i aint ready to give up the fight.

— can man
2:58 pm July 16th, 2008

Let’s not be naive. August III controls that board. If he wanted to fight the InBEv takeover he would have done so. Unfortunately, IV and his father’s relationship sewed the seeds of A-B’s undoing. August IV never got the backing of his father. No different than what Gussie did to August III when he was starting out. The same dysfunctional family cycle repeats itself. I never thought August III would let this happen. Quite frankly, i underestimated the division between himself and his son.

— sab1972
11:34 am July 18th, 2008

Hmmm, Ed Whitacre intervened in our behalf. Isn’t he the past SBC president who disliked St. Louis b/c he was not invited to join a country club, moved the headquarters to San Antonio b/c that is where he preferred to live, and gutted the St. Louis company headquarters, although St. Louis is now in the center of the expanded ATT (old SBC and additions) territory?
Thanks, Ed. And, Mr. Nicklaus, I hope you have moved past your fear that Carlos Brito might become angry with St. Louis and Missouri state officials because they resisted an unsolicited takeover. Next time, please hold off on your instructions for everyone to behave nicely during a hostile takeover. I presume Mr. Brito has reasonably thick skin.

— Hank
11:25 pm July 22nd, 2008

Let’s be realistic. The Board and the Busch’s were powerless. This company is owned by mutual funds and guys like Warrent Buffett. They’re getting killed in the market this year, and were 5 months away from publishing their lousy returns to their investors. So if they had a chance to make a 50% return, and prop up the rest of their portfolio for the year, they’re taking it. They don’t give a hoot about AB’s history or what it means to this town. AB has been dodging this bullet for years, but couldn’t overcome the weak dollar. InBev bought them at 50 cents on the dollar. We’re just a victim in the game of global economics, with one presidential candidate who sees this clearly. Thats why he’s campaigning all over Europe. Why just shoot for President of the USA when you can become President of the World?

— Ryan
2:48 pm July 28th, 2008