Web Search powered by YAHOO! SEARCH
05.07.2009 3:36 pm

Renaissance Hotel seeks concessions from union

St. Louis Post-Dispatch
  • Email this
  • Print this

St. Louis’ Renaissance Hotel, which went through foreclosure earlier this year, is asking union workers to help it cut costs. The downtown hotel is asking Unite Here, the union representing hotel employees, to forego two wage increases and to let management temporarily suspend contributions to retirement accounts.

Bondholders, who took ownership of the hotel in February, were briefed on its finances last week. A summary of the conference call says:

Unite Here proposed to Marriott and the Trustee that its members would forego such contributions and increases, totaling approximately $200,000 over a twelve month period, if the Trustee agreed to require that future owners of the Hotel recognize Unite Here’s collective bargaining agreement. Although the cost savings would be favorable in the short term, the Trustee does not believe that it should obligate future owner(s) of the Hotel.

Bruce Stemerman, of consulting firm Jones Lang LaSalle Hotels, also said that his firm has taken a “preliminary look” at selling the former Lennox Hotel, which has 160 suites and is part of the Renaissance complex.

The report says that the hotel’s first-quarter operating income was ahead of budget by $516,000, but that the rest of the year “is not expected to be as favorable.” Weak demand may leave the Renaissance in the red:

At this time there is a substantial likelihood that the Hotel will have negative Net Operating Income for the year 2009.

1 Star2 Stars3 Stars4 Stars5 Stars (No Ratings Yet)
Loading ... Loading ...
3 comments

Comments are closed.

Seems to me: Corporations won’t be satisfied until we all live in cardboard boxes or an old van down by the river.

— It seems to me
4:24 pm May 7th, 2009

Here is a short video on the Indianapolis hotel workers’ struggle for equality:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=exBtVnZaWUk

— michael biskar
5:45 pm May 7th, 2009

But It Seems, does that mean unions are ineffective? GASP. I am stunned. Surely all the great and powerful negotiators can force the company to pay them bloated salaries to clean toilets? The power of collective bargaining will surely save these jobs, no?

Or maybe, the Democrats that the unions insist on supporting in the City could have done more to make our so-called “convention center” more attractive to organizations that now routinely pass us by.

Welcome to economic reality. If these people want to keep their jobs, they will make concessions. If they don’t, they will join the unemployment roll. Where was your rant against the “Corporations” when they hired these people originally? Surely they were just leading these people down the primrose path by hiring them and getting them used to earning a paycheck, right? LOL

— Tim
1:07 pm May 8th, 2009