Web Search powered by YAHOO! SEARCH
07.20.2009 10:02 am

CIT has roots in St. Louis

St. Louis Post-Dispatch
  • Email this
  • Print this

I’m a business history buff but I didn’t know that CIT, the commercial lender that was bailed out by lenders over the weekend, had its origins in St. Louis. A reader named Tom emailed me with that tidbit, and CIT’s website confirms that the company was founded in St. Louis in 1908 by Henry Ittleson. His early clients included a young chemical company known as Monsanto. The website says that CIT “outgrew” its St. Louis headquarters and moved to New York in 1915, but a 1935 Time article adds some color:

Dynamic, cerebral Henry Ittleson, born in Berlin, brought up in Manhattan and Kansas, was a young executive of much promise in Colonel David May’s shoe & clothing store in St. Louis when he started his finance company in 1908. Colonel May and his partners put up the money. By 1915 a large part of Henry Ittleson’s finance business, chiefly in furniture and machines, was coming from the East. Accordingly, one Saturday noon he piled his filing cabinets into an express car, his employes into a Pullman and the following Monday morning opened shop in Manhattan.

Interestingly, the company was founded in the aftermath of a financial crisis, the Panic of 1907.

1 Star2 Stars3 Stars4 Stars5 Stars (No Ratings Yet)
Loading ... Loading ...
4 comments

Comments are closed.

Very interesting & nice little piece of history, here. I took the chance and invested in CIT on Friday. I believe for those of us who can, the private sector should take a stand for our public companies. More would invest if they could believe in something even large doses of “hope” will get anyone elected,today. Most investores are just scared of being wiped-out. Some are of course, looking for an easy buck to turn, but i do believe that most would like to be invested for long term. What you say?

— Cheryl L
12:42 pm July 20th, 2009

We see your politics, don’t cut off your nose to spite your face.

The company’s losing money for a reason, it’s a poor investment. Other banks are starting to show profit now.

— Maddog
1:58 pm July 20th, 2009

CIT didn’t do business with Obama so no bailout for them. If we invest more with companies like CIT, the U.S. has a lot better chance to recover than banking on Obama who’s never run anything in his life.

— ObamaIsACrook
6:33 am July 21st, 2009

— ObamaIsACrook stated that Obama has never run anything. That’s not quite true. He’s doing a very good job of running this country into the ground.

— John
1:23 pm July 22nd, 2009