Web Search powered by YAHOO! SEARCH
12.31.2008 3:22 pm

Kansas City paying interest on Cordish bonds

St. Louis Post-Dispatch
  • Email this
  • Print this

A small item in today’s Wall Street Journal should stand as a big “caution” sign for St. Louis officials as they negotiate a development deal for Ballpark Village. Cordish, the village’s developer, is also in charge of the Kansas City Power and Light DistrictAccording to the Journal, that ballyhooed downtown project is about to become a drain on Kansas City’s coffers:

Cordish said it has delivered roughly 600,000 square feet of retail, which is now about 70% occupied. But lower-than-projected retail sales per square foot and later-than-expected openings in nonrestaurant retail mean sales-tax revenue from the project will fall short of what is needed to cover the debt service on the city bonds issued to help pay for the district’s development, according to Troy Schulte, the city’s budget officer. The city expects to have to cover a $4 million budget gap on the project’s debt service for the year ending April 30.

Memo to City Hall: I know St. Louis is planning to provide tax incentives to get Ballpark Village built, but please, please, make the project stand on its own after it opens. The city should never, ever agree to be on the hook for a developer’s debt payments.

1 Star2 Stars3 Stars4 Stars5 Stars (2 votes, average: 4 out of 5)
Loading ... Loading ...
3 comments

Comments are closed.

I know of only two tax-increment-financing deals that make the government liable if a project doesn’t generate enough money to pay its bonds.

They are St. Louis’s Marketplace shopping center on Manchester Avenue south of McCausland Avenue and St. Louis County’s NorthPark redevelopment east of Interstate 170 opposite the east end of Lambert Field.

— Phil Sutin
9:23 pm December 31st, 2008

Well!!!, I remember seeing a couple articles in this very newspaper at what a wonderful project this was in KC at that it was full of life yada, yada, yada. When will cities learn, if it can’t be built because someone other then a gov’t entitiy wants it built it probably isn’t viable.

— bantam weight
11:20 am January 5th, 2009

Wow!! Bantam Weight just nailed it right on the the o’le kisser. About the only thing that government buys that has economic viability is aircraft carriers and bombers. Just think how much green space we would have if bureaucrats stayed out of land development.

— Tartan
8:38 am January 8th, 2009