Web Search powered by YAHOO! SEARCH
02.17.2009 5:32 pm

Fed’s Bullard emphasizes danger of deflation

St. Louis Post-Dispatch
  • Email this
  • Print this

James Bullard, president of the St. Louis Federal Reserve Bank, has spent most of his career figuring out how to fight inflation. So when he stands up and says that what we need is more inflation, people should take notice.

In a speech today in New York, Bullard emphasized the danger that deflation poses for the U.S. economy:

… there is a risk that core prices may continue to stagnate or decline slightly for some time to come. Should lingering financial turmoil continue to weigh on the economy and stretch the recession out still longer, the zero or negative inflation could continue through 2009. Over that time frame, deflationary expectations could become entrenched. For this reason I think we face some risk — at this point only a risk — of sustained deflation. One important near-term goal for monetary policy is to guide the economy away from this outcome.

Having already pushed short-term interest rates to zero, the Fed has lost its traditional tool for managing the economy. But, echoing the theme of a recent speech in St. Louis, Bullard said the Fed still has a powerful way to fight deflation. By inflating its balance sheet, the Fed can expand the monetary base, creating reserves that banks will use to make loans.

The monetary base has more than doubled since September, Bullard said, but some of the expansion can be viewed as temporary. As the Fed carries out its announced program to buy mortgage-backed securities and other assets, the balance-sheet expansion should be viewed as permanent, he said, and

it is these purchases that may provide enough expansion in the monetary base to offset the risk of further disinflation and possible deflation. The quantitative effects of policy actions in this new environment are more uncertain than normal, but nevertheless these less-conventional policies can have every bit as powerful an impact on the economy as changes in the intended federal funds rate.

1 Star2 Stars3 Stars4 Stars5 Stars (1 votes, average: 5 out of 5)
Loading ... Loading ...
6 comments

Comments are closed.

Deflation would be a godsend for us on fixed incomes, social security, I’m for it

— Lee James
10:59 am February 18th, 2009

I wish I could simply just”inflate my balance sheet” to increase my money flow by restating the facts. Inflation is bad, now deflation is bad. Do anyone of these professionals have a clue ?

— John Newman
11:46 am February 18th, 2009

Hooray for deflation! A godsend to those laid off and on fixed income. Let’s have deflation for the next couple of years.

— Mona Lisa
12:37 pm February 18th, 2009

As inflation and high interest rates can cause a runaway economic train, so too can deflation and low interest rates. However, I don’t think there is much danger of this becoming entrenched. Oil, if nothing else, will keep that from happening once we get towards the warmer months this year…

— Tim
3:57 pm February 18th, 2009

Maybe whiterose will post in here about kool-aid and java soon.

— Every rose has it's thorn
12:18 pm February 19th, 2009

Deflation in an economy is similar to a fever in a person with an infection. It is both a symptom and — at least in part — a cure. Who would seriously claim that the drop in oil and natural gas prices, which is clearly deflationary, is a bad thing for the economy?

The other part of the cure for the economy, about which Mr. Bullard is correct, is for the Fed to create more money/credit. Although that tends to reduce deflation and increase the prospect of inflation, the PURPOSE of it is not to fight deflation per se, but rather to sustain aggregate demand by sustaining people’s ability to purchase real goods and services. BOTH price deflation and monetary expansion work together to sustain real economic activity.

— Ted44
11:53 am February 24th, 2009