Web Search powered by YAHOO! SEARCH
05.29.2009 6:43 pm

Projections for GM include some big, unrealistic numbers

St. Louis Post-Dispatch
  • Email this
  • Print this

If taxpayers are sinking almost $70 billion into GM, one would hope that we have a chance of being repaid. At least we can hope to get most of our money back, right?

Well, those hopes rest on a series of assumptions, and they’re not necessarily realistic ones. In a conference  call for bondholders on Friday, financial adviser Eric Siegert said the cash infusion from the government implies an equity value of $69 billion for GM. The government would own 72.5 percent of GM’s stock, theoretically worth $50 billion. (The government is writing off some of the money it’s already given GM, and will leave about $8 billion on the balance sheet as debt.)

The shares being handed to other parties, such as bondholders and the United Auto Workers, are also being valued based on that $69 billion equity figure. But how realistic is it?

Not very, say Antony Currie and Rob Cox, writers at BreakingViews.com:

GM’s market cap only reached around $60bn back in its heyday in 2000 when the Motown manufacturer reported about $21bn of earnings before interest, tax, depreciation and amortisation. That was when low gas prices fuelled profitable SUV sales; GM had eight brands and a massive captive financing business, GMAC, which brought in a third of earnings.

The further they take this analysis, the worse things look for us taxpayers:

So for taxpayers to be made whole, the new mini-GM would have to produce earnings sufficient to support an enterprise value of at least $95bn — the sum of a $69bn market cap and its $26bn of consolidated debt and preferred stock. Using market valuation multiples of five times profits, that means New GM must generate ebitda somewhere in the order of $19bn annually.

That would require boosting annual sales to some $150bn — almost 50% more than the entire company is expected to generate this year — and matching the whopping 14% ebitda margin that Toyota achieved in its best year ever. It requires a vast leap of faith — or an audacity of hope — to believe that can happen.

GM’s offer to bondholders includes some warrants that can be exercised if the company’s valuation reaches $15 billion and others that can be exercised at $30 billion. Even so, a group of “Main Street” bondholders reckons that its members are being offered just 13 cents on the dollar. Alas, though, the bondholders’ low hurdles look a lot more reachable than the high bar that’s being set for Uncle Sam to make money.

1 Star2 Stars3 Stars4 Stars5 Stars (3 votes, average: 2.67 out of 5)
Loading ... Loading ...
7 comments

Comments are closed.

Just what is the status of the $70 billion “cash infusion” to GM? Is it a loan? If so, is it senior to GM bonds?

Or is it common stock? Preferred stock? An outright grant? Some mixture of these?

— CorleyK
9:58 pm May 29th, 2009

Hey, why all the doom and gloom. I just point to the success of other government run businesses, say the U.S. Postal Service……..look at how good they are…..just raise the price of the Obama-mobile that they plan to produce……what no one buy it……….like the declining use of the Postal Service………………GM is doomed. What we need to figure out now is how to shake the ’tar baby’ from the taxpayer’s hands.

It looks to me that ”Ford or foreign” is the future strategy of individual ground transportation. Would you buy a government built car?

— tartan
6:49 am May 30th, 2009

The “new” GM will be lucky to survive at all. With most of the General’s profit over the last decade coming from sales of trucks and SUVs, what guarantee is there that anyone will buy small, government-mandated econo-cars? Since the Japanese and Koreans already own that segment of the market, will anyone be willing to buy a loss-leader from Obama Motors? Can you say Vega? Chevette? Monza?

It looks like Ford, if it survives, will be the only real option for an American car (or, at least, a car sold by a company that has its roots in the US). Maybe a cottage industry will spring up in the country where older American vehicles are reconditioned, updated with late-model running gear, and sold to car buyers who remember the “good old days” when Detroit was the undisputed world leader in automobiles.

I want a restored ‘57 Pontiac Chieftan, a ‘67 Mustang fastback, or a ‘62 Chevy Impala bubbletop.

— Merc Man
7:39 am May 30th, 2009

GM will come out of this with a clean balance sheet stripped of its previous legacy dead weight, health costs, pensions, etc. This company will surprise a lot of people to the upside once the auto market recovers.

— B. Madoff
12:56 pm May 30th, 2009

I don’t think Americans are getting what’s going on here. GM is gone. For good. The truth is, it has to die slowly, because the already stressed economy couldn’t afford a total collapse, and Obama has too many union friends in the auto industry. What is happening is they are trying to find the most pain-free exit from the world economy.

— Scott
1:54 pm May 30th, 2009

Question of the day: How much longer is Obama & friends going to rape the taxpayer to save a dead elephant?

— Burt
1:57 pm May 30th, 2009

Just remember that the VEBA stakeholders are retirees and survivors of retirees counting on medical and pensions to eek out a living! As usual, David almost always frames the situation to portray working folks and their organizations as the “bad guys!”

And as an aside to some on this blogsite who claim that this is a mild recession–here’s a link to Bloomberg.com about the unemployment rate hitting a 25 year high: http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601087&sid=aSc829RcWzSc&refer=home. Enjoy: rightwingers and plutocrats!

— whiterosesociety
3:48 pm May 31st, 2009