Web Search powered by YAHOO! SEARCH
03.04.2009 10:17 am

Obama, McCaskill take sharp pencils to defense spending

Post-Dispatch Washington Bureau
  • Email this
  • Print this
Obama lines up with McCaskill and other senators today

Obama lines up with McCaskill and other senators today

WASHINGTON — Flanked by Sen. Claire McCaskill, D-Mo., and other budget hawks, President Barack Obama this morning announced reforms in defense contract spending that he said could save taxpayers $40 billion each year.

Obama made it clear his plan was aimed at spending more efficiently rather than simply spending less, adding more oversight to selecting contractors.

“In Iraq, too much money has been paid out for services that were never performed, buildings that were never completed, companies that skimmed off the top,” Obama said

“The days of giving defense contractors a blank check are over,” he added later.

By July, the administration will release a government-wide guidance so agencies can review existing contracts and eliminate wasteful programs.

The second phase of the reform calls for the following by the end of September:

  • More openness to small businesses in contracting offers to stimulate competition.
  • Greater guidance on when governmental outsourcing is needed and when its unnecessary.
  • Greater oversight on all contract spending in all government agencies.

At the end of the briefing Obama tipped his hat to congressional leaders who are working with him on the issue, including Sen. John McCain, R-Ariz., and McCaskill, “who has been sharpening her pencil” on the issue, Obama said.

(Plug into a STLtoday DCDownload chat with Washington Bureau Chief Bill Lambrecht from 11 to 12 this morning with your questions or comments on Obama’s new initiatives, stimulus, Missourians and Illinoisans in this fast-moving, big-spencing Congress and all things D.C.)

8 comments

Comments are closed.

It seems that the safeguard if our country is not in the best interst for the cuurent administration.Deterioration of the NATIONAL SECURITY SHIELDING that kept us safe during the Bush administration is going at alarming rate.

If we do not protect the country and we get wiped-out, then economy and everytling else is of no consecuence.

Should we get another assault 9-11 type ,…that is the END of the ‘BLIND ACCEPTED OBAMANIZED ERA’;

Democrats are AFRAID of Limbaugh,Steele, and MONUMANTALLY TERRORIZED BY GOV SARAH PALIN, who everyone knows she could delivers much better presidential leadership than Obama.Palin’s ‘Alaska Formula’, adjusted to nation-wide proportion can implement efficient answers to the economic arena.The public knows this, and so,the electorate are having second thougths about this current administration.

Obama and his gang are running out of EXCUSES to substanciate the failure to ‘fix the economy crissis’.

It is important to notice that his so called ‘crissis’ IS NOT AS BAD AS IT IS ‘SOLD TO THE MASSES’- almost infused (like an ENEMA )by Obama and his goup of corrupted tax cheaters, terrorist advocates , etc …however, America is AWAKENING,and is detecting that ALL THIS THEATRICAL DISPLAY IS A DIVERSION FOR NOBODY TO NOTICE THE SYSTEMATIC DESINTEGRATON IN THE NATIONAL DEFENSE, SO OUR GREAT COUNTRY CAN GET WIPED-OUT.

THERE ARE ENEMIES OF THE STATE IN WASHINGTON….THEY NEED TO BE IDENTIFIED AND REMOVED ! THEY ARE THE REAL COMMANDERS,…..OBAMA (although tagged as president) IS JUST ‘THE FRONT MAN’

Be ALERT !
sincerely,
Daniel Cabrera
Merrillville, indiana

— daniel cabrera
11:06 am March 4th, 2009

daniel cabrera,

Afraid of Rush Limbaugh, Democrats?

That label belongs to you Republicans. (lol). Do you really think that Rush and you, his followers are large enough in numbers to strike fear within the Democratic Party? See, it is stupid comments like this that makes it so plain to Independents like myself that you Republicans do not have the intellect to lead this country. You have been blinded with extreme warped and wrong thinking and do not operated in a world of reality.

— D. Walker
11:45 am March 4th, 2009

Should the weakening of the national security structure continues,there is more that 1oo MILLION reasons to get this people REPLACED. WE,THE PEOPLE HAVE THE POWER.(unless THE CONSTITUTION does not mean squat any longer ???)

FISCAL RESPONSABLILITY, FISCAL EQUALITY,TRANSPARENCY,HONESTY
,INTEGRITY;…..all those words, and the concepts behind them ARE TOTALLY ALIEN TO OBAMA AND HIS GANG.
WE NEED BETTER LEADERS AT HELM FOR OUR GREAT COUNTRY, THE CURRENT ADMINSTRATION, LOADED WITH ELEMENTS OF QUESTINALBLE INTEGRITY IS JUST NOT GOOD FOR THE PEOPLE.

I am a simple man, and all I see is that WE, the people were cheated, our trust and money continues to be abused and the perpetrators still at large.

I do not have any confidence on this CORRUPTED PRESENT ADMINISTRATION WHICH IS PERPETUATING THIS ASSAULT AND MOVING THIS GREAT NATION TO OBLIVION.

It seems that Obama(tagged as ‘president’) IS the ‘FRONT MAN’, A ‘TROJAN HORSE FACTOR’, if you will, in a group interested to DESTROY OUR GREAT COUNTRY VIA ECONOMIC COLLAPSE, AND WEAKENING OF THE NATIONAL DEFENSE STRUCTURE.

But the real ‘behind the scene’ CONTROLLERS of this MASTER PLAN, have to be INDENTIFIED, EXPOSED AND PROVED TO BE AS THEY REALLY ARE,…ENEMIES OF THE STATE.

Here is an idea; a team of atorneys-at-the-law, experts in THE CONSTITUTION, …investigators journalists analysts, TO LAUNCH A MASSIVE TOUR THE FORCE program of RESEARCH to PROVE TO THE PUBLIC this CURRENT CORRUPTED ADMINSTRATION AS ANTI-AMERICAN/UN-AMERICAN PRACTICES ORIENTED…so they will be IDENTIFIED AND PRESENTED TO THE PUBLIC.

Then, A CALL for a GENERAL CITIZENS REFERENDUM, in order to REMOVE FROM WASHINGTON ALL OF THEM AND BE REPLACED WITH HONEST, AND SERIOUS OFFICERS TO SERVE THE COUNTRY, WITH INTEGRITY.

Perhaps, doing this - or something on that line of thought - , we do not have to wait for 2010 not even 2012 to TAKE OUR BELOVED COUNTRY BACK!

Impeachments had been done before ( for presidents, governors, etc),…perhaps THIS ONE, will be the first one on history,… to be the first of its kind… A TOTAL GOVERNMENT ANTI-TREASON IMPEACHMENT.

I am sure the atorneys-at-the-law expertise will find the APPROPIATE TERMINOLOGY AND SEMANTICS TO DEAL WITH THIS ONE.

sincerely,
Daniel Cabrera
Merrillville,Indiana

— daniel cabrera
12:00 pm March 4th, 2009

As stated previously Rush and his followers are far removed from reality.

Even most of the pork in this bill now is from Republicans, I agree, too much pork and hopefully Obama will veto the bill if there is too much unnecessary pork in it, we will know when it gets to him.

To be honest, Obama need this bill passed and has no power over the bill before it reaches him. How about all the Republicans voluntarily removing the pork from the bill before it reaches Obama then I will be willing to listen to Republicans and their grievances about wasted pork spending that they claim are within the bill. I seriously do not get Republicans these days.

— D. Walker
12:55 pm March 4th, 2009

daniel cabrera vs. D. Walker…

It’s like putting two marbles in the dryer and hitting the ON button.

===

— BobZ.
2:21 pm March 4th, 2009

After spending years running for office decrying the state of the over-taxed, ‘broken’ military, the first thing The Messiah and his main ‘kisser’ want to do is cut spending for the military.

AMAZING!

Meanwhile:

Is the Post ever going to tell folks about McCaskill’s off shore tax avoidance? Worth millions…

Didn’t think so…

— tsquare
3:35 pm March 4th, 2009

Hey Mr. Walker, you could stand to do some research and get some education.

Score Board On Omnibus Spending Bill…………..

Democrats 60% Republicans 40%

Found in the Post-Dispatch

Care to revise your posting sir?

— LittleOne
7:17 pm March 4th, 2009

LittleOne,

No I will not revise it because this is what I have been reading, and it is exactly what McCaskil stated as was posted here after I wrote my comment. I will take it back only after someone prove to be that my statement is wrong on its face.

“Every single member of Republican leadership has earmarks in this bill,” McCaskill said. “Every single one of these people rejected the stimulus … because supposedly they were so upset about wasteful spending.”

http://www.stltoday.com/blogzone/political-fix/dc-download/2009/03/mccaskill-takes-gop-to-task-on-earmarks/

— D. Walker
10:04 am March 5th, 2009