Keathley sets new deadline for Montee in Nixon car dispute
Mike Keathley, Commissioner of the Office of Administration, is setting a new deadline — this Friday — for state Auditor Susan Montee “to provide his office with the identities of the staff members” in Attorney General Jay Nixon’s office “who provided the false information” when the auditor audited Nixon’s office last year.
Keathley set the new deadline because Montee ignored his old one — last Wednesday. Montee said last week that she wasn’t going to comply with any request from Keathley for the identities of any Nixon aides. Among other things, she said she disagreed with Keathley’s premise that her office was lied to.
At issue: Until a few months ago, Nixon had been using his taxpayer-funded state car when he made political stops and trips, saying that he was attorney general 24/7, and the car was equipped with the necessary equipment so he could conduct his official functions while traveling.
When Montee’s staff audited Nixon’s office, his staff said that Nixon used the car only for official business. Montee says that wasn’t false information, since that’s how Nixon interpreted all travel.
OA disagrees, and Keathley says he wants the identities of the Nixon staffers so he can question them further. In his release, Keathley contends that the Nixon staffer also may have broken a state law that bars withholding information from state auditors.
Nixon has since obtained a campaign vehicle, and has reimbursed the state about $47,000 for three years worth of travel. He and the Office of Administration continue to haggle over whether his office has adequately documented the political-private miles used to come up with the reimbursement figure.
At Nixon’s request, Montee’s staff is reviewing what documentation he has sent to OA to see if it is in line with what Lt. Gov. Peter Kinder, a Republican, provided to OA when he reimbursed for similar travel.
Kinder also has obtained a campaign car.
Montee, by the way, says that state law doesn’t allow such reimbursements because state law doesn’t allow non-official use of the state cars.
Gov. Matt Blunt , who Nixon is challenging, travels to campaign events in a vehicle provided by the Highway Patrol, and accompanied by patrol officers, 24/7. The difference is that Blunt is covered by a law, passed in 2005, that legalized a practice in place for decades.
In his release, Keathley said he “is not ruling out using other means to secure” the information he’s seeking from Montee about Nixon.
“I posed my request to you in hopes that I would be spared the use of other more intrusive legal processes,” Keathley wrote. “If you will not assist me as the State of Missouri’s Auditor by December 21st, I will seek another method of obtaining the information I have requested.”


Keathley is on a slippery slope, here.
Is driving to and from work considered “official business?”
I think it’s time they start dealing with real issues, rather than witch hunts. By this, I mean BOTH sides of the aisle.
This is starting to look quite juvenile.
Jim - According to the IRS, driving to and from work is NOT considered official business. That is to say, you can’t deduct mileage for travel between your residence and your place of business. For more details on this issue, read the story (link below) about Rod Blagojevich’s travel between Chicago and Springfield - he doesn’t dispute that it would be taxable, but instead takes the position that his Chicago office is his primary place of business.
http://www.stltoday.com/stltoday/news/stories.nsf/illinoisnews/story/CA07C393C0879E44862573B4004F58EC?OpenDocument
PS - Kinda takes the teeth out of a “deadline” if you just set a new one when the old one’s violated. Sounds to me more like a “target” or a “preference” than a deadline.
Nick at #2: The IRS treatment of commuting mileage is utterly irrelevant.
Who is this Keathley clown setting “deadlines” anyway? Montee’s an elected state official, she doesn’t answer to him.
http://www.oa.mo.gov/guide03/gov_org.htm
The IRS treatment of commuting mileage doesn’t govern here, but it isn’t utterly irrelevant either. Rather, it is indicative of the fact that commuting is not generally considered to be official business.
You are correct that other elected officials do not answer to the governor. However, it may be that the Office of Administration has some authority here - see http://www.oa.mo.gov/guide03/admin.htm for details.
My point is that this is coming dangerously close to telling elected officials, as well as state employees who have been assigned vehicles, that they can’t take cars home at night.
A slippery slope, indeed.
Let’s get back to setting sound public policy instead of this crap, deal?
“This crap” IS public policy. Things like compliance with the sunshine law, and unlawful use of state resources for personal purposes, may first be exposed because of partisan motives during an election season. But they are ultimately important to good government. Unless you want to continue having a government which is opaque and serves the interests of its own employees over the public, we have to deal with such things.
Jim the republican is right. It’s time to stop this back and forth nonsense and get down to the real issues at hand.
Nick is talking typical partisan right wing talking point.
BD - Are you saying that it’s ok for public officials to ignore the sunshine law, and to use state property for personal or campaign use? The latter issue wasn’t a “right wing talking point” when Mel Carnahan rode it to the governor’s mansion, and Bill Webster rode it to prison.