Web Search powered by YAHOO! SEARCH
01.14.2008 6:30 pm

Americans for Prosperity target Missouri school districts

Americans for Prosperity – a fiscally conservative, pro-business, low-tax group — has begun airing ads in Missouri that take aim at school districts that have participated in the law suit seeking changes in the state’s school-aid formula.

The ad began airing late last week in southwest Missouri. It’s unclear why the group has opted to air the ad now. It doesn’t mention any of the presidential candidates on the Feb. 5 ballot. But some school districts around the state may also have school-finance proposals on the Feb. 5 ballot as well.

 Here’s a look at the ad:

 

13 comments

Comments are closed.

Bill…Are you online, what do you think about this???

— M
7:10 pm January 14th, 2008

Good point, great ad. Thanks to Americans for Prosperity for getting out this important message.

— Nick Kasoff
8:11 pm January 14th, 2008

Jo, is this a joke? When I hit your link it invites me to meet sexy girls. What is going on?

— A CENTRIST
8:15 pm January 14th, 2008

It is no suprise to see some of the schools that keep wasting money on items and then crying they need more money are big donors on the list. Then they waste thousands trying PR tricks to put another tax increase on the ballot.
We must demand accountablity from our schools, more money does not mean a better education, but wise spending on needed items to improve fundamentals will help.
Just look how much money the city of St. Louis spends on a per student basis!!!

— kitb285
10:26 pm January 14th, 2008

The ‘Youtube’ link tells me nothing. If the state schools involved are soaking the taxpayer, why did Governor Blunt commit to increase school funding every year he serves as governor?

http://www.gov.mo.gov/cgi-bin/coranto/viewnews.cgi?id=EEllukkEyACblSpIFz&style=Default+News+Style&tmpl=newsitem

As for APF, I have to hand it to Tim Phillips for living up to the organizations principles with his $184,000.00 + compensation

— skippy
6:40 am January 15th, 2008

The more that is done to hold these districts accountable to the taxpayer, the better. Good ad.

— Brian
9:49 am January 15th, 2008

#6: The school boards are directly accountable to the voters, and there’s usually a surplus of candidates on the ballot. Vote them out, or run yourself.

— Ron2
10:16 am January 15th, 2008

Too true, Ron2, but the frustrating part is finding out if your school board is still involved. Have they voted on joining an appeal? Have they pulled out? Hard to tell at times. How can school boards be directly accountable to the voters if we have no idea what they’re doing and when?

And, monsignor skippy points out that Blunt (and some legislators if you look at today’s news) have proposed major increases in ed. funding…yes, they have the authority to do that–the court doesn’t. The literal definition of “soaked” in this case is “spent education money (taxpayer money) to sue taxpayers to demand that taxpayers pay more money.” Do you feel like you’re in a Joseph Heller novel yet?

— benini
11:18 am January 15th, 2008

As usual - Skippy gets confused. Read the court decision. The Governor and legislature are doing their jobs funding schools.

The commercial was well done. Obviously the schools are spending “precious” dollars on lawyers instead of kids even as they get more money. Wouldn’t think that was too hard to understand even for Skippy - but apparently I am wrong.

— Jasonb
11:34 am January 15th, 2008

#9, Why don’t you try making a real argument instead of resorting to belittlement? I don’t think you can-and I don’t think you will respond with one. If you repond with more of the same, I’m done.

— skippy
2:01 pm January 15th, 2008

Pages: [1] 2 » Show All