Web Search powered by YAHOO! SEARCH
01.24.2008 10:05 pm

Bond proposes poll to winnow out GOP field

During Wednesday’s massive conference call with Republican officials, activists and gubernatorial hopefuls, U.S. Sen. Christopher “Kit” Bond proposed a poll to thin out the field of potential replacements for Gov. Matt Blunt on the November ballot.

Bond, acting in his role as chief GOP negotiator, suggested that a poll be conducted that would pit each of the GOP hopefuls against the likely Democratic nominee, Attorney General Jay Nixon.

Under that plan, the Republican candidate who fares best against Nixon would be encouraged to run, while the other hopefuls would agree to bow out and, thus, avoid an expensive and combative Republican primary in August.

That suggestion (reportedly used months ago in the initial multi-candidate Republican battle for attorney general, and resulting in an unopposed Michael Gibbons) went over well with some hopefuls, and not with others.

Among those allegedly not too thrilled with the poll idea: state Treasurer Sarah Steelman.

When asked to expand on the poll suggestion, a Bond aide declined to confirm whether the senator had proposed it, but did say that it was “among many other ideas we’re discussed.”

“ This was a confidential discussion among party leaders,” the aide said. “We will get into no more specifics than that. Confidentiality is necessary to ensure a free and open discussion.”

1 Star2 Stars3 Stars4 Stars5 Stars (3 votes, average: 2.33 out of 5)
Loading ... Loading ...
16 comments

Comments are closed.

Confidentiality is necessary for an open discussion? That right there seems to sum up a lot of people’s reservations about the Republican Party.

— MarkieB
12:12 am January 25th, 2008

Good idea! Let’s have a “primary” to avoid having a primary. Seems to be yet another alcohol induced inspiration from Sen. Bond.

— beenthere
6:56 am January 25th, 2008

MarkieB - Are you saying that Democrats hold their political strategy meetings in public? I don’t think so.

beenthere - Having a poll now is a lot less costly than having a primary in August. Not only that, but in a tough primary, candidates often come out looking horrible. Remember the Webster-Blunt-Bailey primary? THAT is what Republicans are hoping to avoid, and you really can’t blame them.

— Nick Kasoff
8:24 am January 25th, 2008

Thank you for your wisdom, Kisoff.

— A. Noni Mouse
8:34 am January 25th, 2008

I mean, stating the obvious.

— A. Noni Mouse
8:36 am January 25th, 2008

The Republicans would be wise to avoid a primary. Luckily with their worst option Kinder already saying he is in the Democrats can feel safe. The Republicans either have to get behind this loser and close Blunt ally, or get into an ugly and expensive primary. Personally, I think Jo Ann Emerson is their best bet.

— Richard
9:05 am January 25th, 2008

Nick - Having a poll, as suggested by Bond, is exactly the same as having a primary except you only allow the “important” people to vote. Sure it saves money and it also saves the embarassment of politicians in a cat fight but it is not democracy. That applies to the Democrats as well, by the way. What Bond is saying is democracy is too important to be left in the hands of the people.

— beenthere
9:09 am January 25th, 2008

Nick, isn’t it funny how dems love to tell us who we should run for governor?

Emerson? Honestly? Most in Missouri have never even heard of her (probably because she has lived most of her adult life in another state), and she doesn’t exactly draw out the republican base.

But that’s what they want, isn’t it?

— Jim (the republican)
9:13 am January 25th, 2008

The country-clubers certainly don’t want Emerson or Steelman or Col. Jackson. Those 3 are too free-thinking, show too much independence of the party and can’t be controlled by the rightwing fringe.

— Robb(I)
10:39 am January 25th, 2008

We need conservative leadership!

http://DraftHulshof.Blogspot.com

— Draft Hulshof
11:03 am January 25th, 2008

Pages: [1] 2 » Show All