Web Search powered by YAHOO! SEARCH
01.16.2008 1:48 pm

Did Nixon “storm out,” and where was Steelman?

State Republican Party spokesman Paul Sloca appeared to be in his element this morning, sending out a press release that began with the following:

“In a rude and disrespectful display unbecoming of a statewide official from any political party, an angry and red-faced Jay Nixon abruptly stormed out during last night’s State of the State address 10 minutes into the speech and headed directly home, according to several eyewitness accounts.

            “While Democrat lawmakers and statewide officials showed respect for the Office of the Governor and the decorum of the Missouri House, Nixon shook his head in apparent disgust and whispered comments to fellow Democrat Susan Montee before exiting the House chamber at 7:10 p.m. Nixon then left the Capitol in his political vehicle a few minutes later for home.  Such was Nixon’s rage that he left a side House gallery door open upon exiting that had to be closed by a member of the Missouri State Highway Patrol providing security….”

 Nixon spokesman Oren Shur said in reply that the attorney general ”attended the beginning of the speech to show respect for the office,” then left “to meet with Democratic leaders to discuss a response” to Blunt’s proposals outlined in his address.

Shur denied that Nixon — who is seeking to unseat Blunt in November – had been angry and said Nixon had left quietly and discreetly. Shur also denied Sloca’s contention that “within seven minutes (of leaving the chamber), Nixon was in his vehicle on his way out of the Capitol.”

UPDATE:

Sloca added later today,

“An eyewitness has Nixon leaving the Capitol garage at 7:17 p.m., getting into his vehicle and leaving. … There just may be some videotape out there exposing Nixon’s denials, just like his illegal use of state vehicles and subsequent denials were exposed on videotape. Stay tuned.”

The statewide officials known to be attendance during Blunt’s speech included state Auditor Montee, a Democrat,  and Lt. Gov. Peter Kinder, a Republican who introduced Blunt.

A spokeswoman for Secretary of State Robin Carnahan, a Democrat, said she was there as well.

Absent was state Treasurer Sarah Steelman, a Republican.   Steelman was in Camden County addressing the county  Republican Club. A spokeswoman said that Steelman was the group’s keynote speaker, and had agreed to address the group months ago, before Blunt announced the timing of his State of the State address.

No reports of any repeat by anyone (D or R) of state House Speaker Rod Jetton’s shout-out (he was the speaker-in-waiting at the time)  during then-Gov. Bob Holden’s last State of the State in 2004.  

(By the way, Jetton was at last night’s address. He’s indisposed today after undergoing hernia surgery this morning.)

1 Star2 Stars3 Stars4 Stars5 Stars (7 votes, average: 1.86 out of 5)
Loading ... Loading ...
15 comments

Comments are closed.

Nixon is a really classy guy. Love it.

— Nick Kasoff
2:08 pm January 16th, 2008

Nick,

“Nixon spokesman Oren Shur said in reply that the attorney general ”attended the beginning of the speech to show respect for the office,” then left “to meet with Democratic leaders to discuss a response” to Blunt’s proposals outlined in his address.

Shur denied that Nixon — who is seeking to unseat Blunt in November – had been angry and said Nixon had left quietly and discreetly.”

Sounds like he-said, he-said to me. Why the dis on J?

— A. Noni Mouse
2:32 pm January 16th, 2008

Surely there were cameras on Nixon as he left … I wonder who has film.

— Jim (the republican)
4:31 pm January 16th, 2008

Is this gossip really news?

— Who Cares?
5:32 pm January 16th, 2008

Jetton was just a plain-ole state rep when he made the childish outbursts at the 2004 SOS address, not the “speaker in waiting.” He wasn’t selected (formally or even informally) for the top job until much later. In fact, Jetton’s selection was regarded as surprising, in view of that earlier conduct. He has grown into his role; criticism of his actions as speaker have been based on the substance of his actions, not his personal style.

— St_Louis_Oracle
5:49 pm January 16th, 2008

Oracle, you’re wrong about the circumstances surrounding the shout-out. Our story from that 2004 episode referred to Jetton as the designated successor to then-Speaker Catherine Hanaway.

The recollection of that incident is not meant, in any way, to infer anything about Jetton’s current performance. But it is part of his past.

— Jo Mannies
8:33 pm January 16th, 2008

Jo,

Unless there’s something left out of this post, I think it is completely inappropriate for the website of a major newspaper. As a journalist, you have a duty to investigate various claims and not simply act as a stenographer for the people in power. If there is no evidence for Sloca’s claims, other than his undisclosed “eyewitness”, then he should not get to insert personal attacks into the public discourse via the Post-Dispatch.

I don’t mean to sound harsh but it strikes me as part of a larger problem where the media culture seems to think that being “objective” is just writing down the opinions of two opposing views rather than figuring out what the actual facts are. The former view may seem fair enough, but it can actually be quite easily abused by shameless administrations like Bush or Blunt. Take, for example, the following set of headlines:

“Blunt says Nixon likes to dress up like a Nazi. Nixon denies it.”
“Sloca says Nixon has swastika tie. Nixon denies it.”
“Bond says Nixon is big fan of Hitler. Nixon denies it.”

While following the so-called “objective” method of journalism, these clearly paint a negative picture without any basis in fact. Likewise, this blog post, as far as I can tell, is merely adding to a calculated GOP narrative against Nixon without even asking for any independent confirmation.

— Adam
11:26 pm January 16th, 2008

Oracle wrong again? Give a man a website and…well let him fumble and a revise history..

— Turth Is
6:33 am January 17th, 2008

Wow, I missed those headlines!

Should I Google them?

Take a pill, Adam. There’s a reason this is in Political Fix, and not on the front page.

— Jim (the republican)
8:22 am January 17th, 2008

Why is it again that people hate politics so much? Why is voter turnout so low?
Ah yes, nonsense like this.

— Darren01
10:26 am January 17th, 2008

Pages: [1] 2 » Show All