Web Search powered by YAHOO! SEARCH
01.29.2008 10:52 pm

South County Democrat opposes trash collection districts

A Democratic state representative from south St. Louis County wants the county to slow down and rethink its effort to set up eight trash collection districts in the unincorporated area.

The county administration, run by Democrats, is pushing the plan. Several Republican elected and party officials from South County have been outspoken opponents.

“I’m against it,” State Rep. Pat Yaeger, a Democrat who represents Lemay and part of Affton, said of the county’s plan. “With compromise, it could be a good plan,” she said on Tuesday. County officials, she said “have not listened to the people.”

The county should start trash districts on a small scale, establishing them in areas where householders want them, she said. “If…(districts are) successful there, then the county could take it forward,” she said.

Yaeger has been in the state House of Representatives since 2003. She has experience dealing with trash collection issues, having served on the county’s solid waste commission. She dealt with trash problems when she worked with Project Lemay, a county-sponsored community improvement effort, in the mid 1990s.

Currently, householders in the unincorporated area arrange for their own trash collection. The county plans calls for it to select a single hauler for each district through bids. The haulers would collect trash and recyclable material once a week and provide bulky pickup twice a year.

Most municipalities have a single hauler collect trash, but in Florissant, Ladue. Town and Country and four small municipalities, householders must arrange for trash service.

Yaeger said she had been concerned about details of the county plan even before it became highly controversial.

Among the issues are what the plan would do to small haulers who might be unable to bid for an entire district, she said. Some areas are satisfied with their small hauler and want to keep the current service, Yaeger said.

Only subdivisions can opt out of the county plan. Some householders cannot take advantage of that provision because they do not live in subdivisions or lack functioning subdivision boards of trustees, she said.

Yaeger said some people may be using the trash-district issue to further their political agendas, including incorporation of south St. Louis County.

Tuesday’s St Louis County Council meeting saw some political sparing about trash districts. Speaking in the public forum part of the meeting, Celeste Witzel, Republican committeewoman from Oakville Township, criticized Democrats for planning the districts.

County Councilman Mike O’Mara, D-Florissant, pointed out that a Republican-controlled council authorized the districts when it adopted a new waste management code in December, 2006. The action came at the last meeting of that council.

Councilwoman Colleen Wasinger, R-Town and Country, noted the council adopted the new code unanimously that day.

Councilman Greg Quinn, R-Ballwin, indicated the vote might have been different in 2006 had the public been aware of the code’s implications.

The vehement criticism of districts started in March of last year after the county staff began work on establishing the districts.

4 comments

Comments are closed.

Congratulations to Pat Yeagar for standing up for the people of South County!! We hope to see more of her legislative comrades jump on board this proposal.

— West End Guy
1:35 pm January 30th, 2008

Oh, for crying out loud. I remember when the County Council first voted on these trash districts. It was one of Skip Mange’s pet projects and the Republicans were in control. There were plenty of public hearings at that time. What’s wrong with people in South County…don’t they pay attention to things until two years later?

— Margaret Campbell
3:01 pm January 30th, 2008

REALLY Margaret ? When were these hearings held? How many were there? How many did you attend? And what were these hearings labeled — “Waste Management Code Revision” , perhaps? Where no one but the Department of Public Health would know what that term represented? It sure sounds like you might work for county government since you’re so ‘in the know.’

But please, pat youself on the back if you’re simply someone who is all-knowing, and someone who pays attention to “Waste Management Code Revision” public hearings, and who even knows what that term means.

Got to hand it to you, Margeret, while the rest of us were too busy dealing with kids, parents, jobs, etc. you were the ONE person, besides county government officials, who knew what was going on.

— NipTuk
4:00 pm January 30th, 2008

Hate to rain on your parade, Margaret, but in reality, the trash district aspect of the Waste Mgmt Code was put into the legislation on the very night it was voted on by the County Council back in December, 2006. When the hearings were held on the Waste Mgmt legislation, the trash districts were NOT part of the legislation, so no one would have been able to speak against what was not part of the legislation when the hearings took place. I would refer you to any of those sitting Council members from Dec. 2006, including Skip Mange, to confirm this fact. Page 57 (the final page) of the Waste Mgmt Code was added the day of the last meeting of the GOP controlled council and the last night of Skip’s service on the Council.

People in South County started speaking out against this provision last March when it was discovered the trash districts were slipped in at the last minute in December. As Ms. Yaeger states above, no one within county govt. paid any attention until the peoples voices against this ’slipped in’ provision until literally thousands of people started attending meetings to voice their opposition to these districts.

— West End Guy
5:36 pm January 30th, 2008