Web Search powered by YAHOO! SEARCH
02.27.2008 4:54 pm

After committee switch, city police bill back on track

St. Louis Post-Dispatch

Wags like us weren’t the only ones scratching their heads over the committee assignment of a bill that would end state control of the St. Louis police department.

The measure, sponsored by State Rep. Talibdin El-Amin, was set for a hearing yesterday in front of the Urban Education Committee.

The issue - abolishing the state-appointed Police Board that calls the shots at 1200 Clark - is certainly an urban one.

But its connection to education? Tangential, at best.

Perhaps that’s why this week’s hearing was canceled, and the bill moved from the Urban Education Committee to the Special Committee on Urban Issues.

Though both committees are chaired by Democrats - the only such ones in the capitol - the Urban Issues committee is led by State Rep. Rodney Hubbard, a close ally of El-Amin, who is the panel’s vice-chair.

The new hearing is set for Tuesday afternoon, and several City Hall officials - including Mayor Francis Slay - are expected to testify in favor of the plan.

T.D. El-AMin

El-Amin: Bill gets new committee, hearing date

1 Star2 Stars3 Stars4 Stars5 Stars (1 votes, average: 0 out of 5)
Loading ... Loading ...
4 comments

Comments are closed.

Kudos, I applaud the effort of these legislators to restore local control. It is appalling that St. Louis is one of only two cities that don’t have control of its police department. It is also refreshing to see St. Louis representatives, local elected officials, and various groups working together to achieve this,

— Frank Hatton
7:30 am February 28th, 2008

Frank, there’s been a very good reason why KC and STL don’t have local control of their departments. Look at their history!

— Jim (the republican)
9:28 am February 28th, 2008

I wont even begin to expound on how offensive your comments are Jim.

— Black Democrat
1:45 pm February 28th, 2008

Jim (the republican)’s comments are also very ill-informed. The loss of city control is really a holdover from long-ago days, has nothing to do with the current conduct of the SLMPD, and, because of that, it should end. That doesn’t mean that the state shouldn’t retain some authority over all local police departments through state law; however, the governor and state senators really shouldn’t be in the business of appointing members to local boards.

— bahaha
11:39 am March 12th, 2008