Web Search powered by YAHOO! SEARCH
02.04.2008 6:38 pm

Candidates break with tradition: No street money

(Jake Wagman contributed to this post)

For decades, many of St. Louis’ ward organizations in predominantly black areas have received payments from candidates to help pay for election-day poll workers and other “street” activities aimed at reaching African-American voters. Also getting such money, in the past, have been some politically active groups in black neighborhoods in St. Louis and Kansas City.

But apparently not this time. People close to the campaigns for Sens. Hillary Rodham Clinton and Barack Obama say they are battling it out for the region’s black voters without resorting to what usually is known as “street money.”

Local Clinton spokeswoman Carly Lindauer said, “We absolutely are not paying any poll workers. It’s all volunteer.”

Local  Obama Caleb Weaver offered a similar comment. “We are not paying the ward organizations. We are relying on the strength of our grassroots organizations. You only need to look at the 22,000 last Saturday in the Edwards Jones Dome to see how excited people are about Barack Obama.”

 Norma Leggette, committeewoman from the city’s Fourth Ward, is among those who are used to getting the election payments. She confirmed that the Obama campaign was not distributing any cash to her ward for poll workers.

“I suppose he does know what he is doing,” said Leggette. “He’s come this far.”

 State Rep. Talbdin El-Amin, committeeman in the First Ward and an Obama supporter, also said that he did not receive any Election Day money from either candidate. “I don’t know who has the money,” El-Amin said. “I just know it’s not me.”

El-Amin said that Obama will have to count on something else to replace the usual for-hire corps of poll workers: “The spirit of volunteerism.”

By law, the payments must come from candidates on the ballot. As a result, the payments can’t come from other elected officials who might want to help Obama or Clinton.

James Clark, a community activist aligned with Clinton, said, “I am making no payments to ward organizations, nor am I putting together a massive field operation like I was preparing to do. I am not involved in getting any poll workers at all.”

Clark added that he was surprised by the candidates’ decision. “I was expecting both of the candidates to engage the electorate more, with street visibility and canvassing,” he said.

“If you don’t get CNN, you wouldn’t know there’s an election Tuesday,” Clark continued. “From a street level, you would not think there is an election. There’s no yard signs, no fliers. The community should be abuzz.”

Clark added that he was concerned the lack of visibility might translate into lower turnout in black neighborhoods. “In these kind of elections, whoever controls the street wins. And neither candidate is controlling the streets.”

1 Star2 Stars3 Stars4 Stars5 Stars (3 votes, average: 5 out of 5)
Loading ... Loading ...
13 comments

Comments are closed.

So what you are saying is that the local ward leaders won’t be bribed this year. Talk about political corruption, seriously, you want to get paid to go out and support someone you supposedly believe in?

— gofigure
8:03 pm February 4th, 2008

The Obama campaign in Iowa had volunteers for EVERYTHING. Except I had to pay my 15-yr-old to get her to baby-sit at the caucus.

— Soldier's Mom
8:19 pm February 4th, 2008

2008 and urban candidate operatives express surprise that people they are responsible for turning out would be able to think for themselves and vote. And with the election board supposedly handing out lunches- what will ward bosses be good for? Boss Daily ( or Hog) must be rolling in their graves. Good riddance!

— kc
9:20 pm February 4th, 2008

I received a call from my committeewoman asking me to volunteer for Obama tomorrow - I said YES!

— zingy
10:18 pm February 4th, 2008

OMG!

What’s next… dead people NOT voting in the city?

Well… not this year, but still.

— tsquare
10:56 pm February 4th, 2008

The End of the Old Political Structure is gone, so now the people that travel through your neighborhood to support candidates are those people that can afford to take off from work. Therefore the regular working people that Senator Barack Obama and Senator Hillary Clinton claim that they planning on creating a better future for one day, can’t afford to volunteer or work as a paid canvasser because they are at their second job.

So there are no yard signs in the neighborhood, big signs in the community, or other forms of getting out the message in the community. Funny how the old system was good enough to make a way for Senator Barack Obama and Senator Hillary Clinton to run for President, but now it is time to abandon it.

Hell with the community people though, because that major television station owner needs the money more than the little ole people in the community. All candidates Republican and Democrat talk all day about diversity, but look at the make-up of their office and you will see how much diversity they really believe in!

Nobody is working full time in a campaign office for free, nobody can afford to give rides to the polling places from 6AM-7PM for free. Believe that campaign office workers receive compensation through contracts to work on campaigns, and they receive big money. However, they want more money and believe that it is possible to cut out the “little people (the community).”

This is sort of like the downsizing of companies that all these Presidential candidates say that they are against, but they are downsizing out the community people that are usually working part-time or in between jobs that look forward to making a measly $50.00 for working from 6AM-7PM. That’s right $50.00 for a 12 hour shift, yeah they are really overpaid by Presidential candidates. Compare that to $3,000.00 per 30 seconds for a television commercial, and you see the United States of America that we are becoming.

The community seems to get the shaft more and more, and the big corporations seem to get richer and richer. Unfortunately, the people representing the community are not doing a good job of getting the voice of the community heard, but that will change in the near future. However, this will not occur in the Presidential election on Super Tuesday, this will occur when Duper Tuesday happens on August 5, 2008. The people will be involved in this election and the candidates will have to face the people up close and personal, unlike the Presidential candidates.

— People Don't Matter Anymore
11:34 pm February 4th, 2008

I’m sick of the corrupt urban political machine. Good riddance. It’s time for folks like El-Amin and Leggette to get money legally, by working in a job.

I’ve always thought that many Repubs sold out to corrupt corporations and many Dems sold out to corrupt urban politics.

— chris
8:07 am February 5th, 2008

Wow, “People Don’t Matter”, you must have really been counting on that check …

— Nick Kasoff
8:41 am February 5th, 2008

The city wards can learn from the Ladue bankers and the Clayton corporate elite.
Have your employees hand out Republican literature during business hours….

— Garrison
9:46 am February 5th, 2008

Gee Garrison… (post #9) when did THAT HAPPEN?

I don’t think that it did… because it would be a clear violation of election laws, AND the Post would plaster it all over the front page.

what else you got?

— tsquare
11:29 am February 5th, 2008

HA!
I just voted at New City School and was wondering why there wasn’t a crush of “electioneers” outside. There was just one very polite lady supporting Hillary Clinton. I guess Obamiacs can handle climate-controlled arenas but not a little drizzle without payment.

— A. Noni Mouse
1:37 pm February 5th, 2008

tsquare what election laws would handing out information at work violate?

The boss can hand out any documents he wants to his workers. The First Amendment does not take a back seat to the election laws. If I own a business and I want to pay somone to handout information at my business I have every right to do just that. If you disagree you can thow the political ad away.

— Really?
1:42 pm February 5th, 2008

Really: (post # 12)

It was IMPLIED that the “Ladue bankers and the Clayton corporate elites” were paying their people to hand out stuff ‘during working hours’

Our friend Garrison is not always clear… true enough… but I understood what he was saying.

— tsquare
3:12 pm February 5th, 2008