Web Search powered by YAHOO! SEARCH
02.27.2008 6:44 pm

Conservatives and casinos unite

In an unlikely pairing, the gambling industry is pushing a bill sponsored by a conservative Republican, Sen. Jack Goodman of Mt. Vernon.

His bill (SB1171) would place a two-year moratorium on licenses for new casinos.

The bill was spurred, in part, by the Missouri Gaming Commission’s recent decision to seek proposals for a new casino in Sugar Creek, in the Kansas City area. Those proposals are due March 11.

Ameristar, Harrah’s, Isle of Capri and Argosy already operate casinos in the Kansas City area. They say another casino would simply siphon off some of their business, rather than increase the market and the state’s gaming tax revenues.

Mike Winter, a lobbyist for the industry’s trade group, testified for the moratorium today. He said a two-year cooling-off period would let Missouri regulators evaluate the impact of increased competition from planned casinos in Kansas.

Gaming Commission Executive Director Gene McNary testified against the moratorium. He said legislators shouldn’t get involved in whether to issue more licenses.

“That’s why you have a commission — to treat it in a comprehensive manner, rather than to have the industry say, ‘We don’t think there should be any competition here,’” McNary said.

If the bill doesn’t pass, the gaming industry has another option: an initiative petition. A proposal ready for circulation would cap the state’s casinos at those already built or being built. It also would repeal the state’s $500 loss limit and raise gaming taxes slightly.

Secretary of State Robin Carnahan approved the petition’s wording today. That means supporters can start collecting signatures to get the plan on the November ballot. The deadline to submit the petitions is May 4.

1 Star2 Stars3 Stars4 Stars5 Stars (No Ratings Yet)
Loading ... Loading ...
4 comments

Comments are closed.

I wish somebody would do an initiative petition to prohibit the use of paid canvassers seeking signatures on initiative petitions. Initiative petitions are a great idea in principle, but moneyed interests, from the casinos to stem cell research advocates, have beat it to death.

— Nick Kasoff
6:56 pm February 27th, 2008

Nick, I’m still waiting for some sort of civil penalties toward those that use misleading rhetoric to obtain signatures on these petitions!

— Jim (the republican)
9:22 am February 28th, 2008

I dislike the initiative petition process entirely, but I do read what those canvassers are hawking. As I was leaving the Ballwin post office one Saturday, a canvasser approached me with three clipboards, each with a ballot proposal. I read them all (can’t remember exactly what they were, but one of them was eminent domain-related), signed one and gave the other two back saying I didn’t support them.

The canvasser seemed stunned. I think she was used to an all-or-nothing response: friendly people would sign all of them, uninterested people would blow her off.

— PLR
11:21 am February 28th, 2008

Exactly, PLR.

Unfortunately, you’re in a small grouping of people who DO read those things for themselves.

— Jim (the republican)
12:35 pm February 28th, 2008