Bench strength: Prominent legal family to fete Koster
One of St. Louis’ most well-known clan of barristers will hold court for Chris Koster, a Democrat running to become the state’s top lawyer.
The Dowd Family - a nest of legal eagles that has included judges, prosecutors and litigators - is hosting a fundraiser tonight in Clayton for Koster’s bid for the Attorney General nomination.
The Dowds are practically a bar association unto themselves. Edward L. Dowd Jr. is a former U.S. Attorney; James R. Dowd was the chief judge of the Missouri Court of Appeals. There are also several Dowds in private practice, and another, David Dowd, who is a judge in the city.
The patriarchs of the bunch are, of course, the late Edward L. Dowd Sr., the former City Circuit Attorney who ran for governor in 1972, and Robert G. Dowd Sr., also deceased, a longtime judge.
Tonight’s gathering is at Araka, the posh Southern European eatery on Carondelet Plaza.
Koster: Family support from the Dowds




Jack,
It’s funny to hear you moan about people “attacking” and then to watch you turn around and spout nonsense about both Harris and Donnelly. I’ll make no bones here, I’m supporting Harris, but I’d be happy to vote for Donnelly. Koster on the other hand? Well, I’m not sure I can hold my nose hard enough to pull the lever for him.
Harris ran a division in the Attorney General’s office under Nixon. So he actually was a leader, just not the top dog. And unlike Koster, the AG Harris worked under didn’t go to prison. Guilt by association? Maybe, but Koster’s got plenty of associations to feel guilty about. Again, you attempt to gloss over the facts about Koster’s time in the Senate. His experience there is almost entirely bad. The guy championed and helped shepherd Matt Blunt’s agenda through the Senate. That’s right, the same Matt Blunt who couldn’t win statewide. Hmmm. Koster supported voter ID. Care to defend that one to us Democrats? Koster voted for Blunt’s Medicaid cuts. Care to defend that one?
And Koster’s experience as a prosecutor, while respectable, is hardly a deal maker. Sure he was a prosecutor. But the Attorney General ISN’T a prosecutor. It’s about a lot more than that, and considering WHO Koster is taking money from, it’s hard to imagine that we can trust him to represent OUR interests in office. Can we trust him to defend public schools when he’s taking so much money from a guy like Rex Sinquefield?
And if you subtract away Sinquefield’s money and Koster’s $200,000 in loans to his campaign, guess what? He hasn’t raised any more money than anyone else. So much for your argument there. Also, where do you get this nonsense that Koster’s gotten more all the endorsements. Two of the biggest, SEIU and AFSCME didn’t go to him, and Harris has got a number of big endorsements too from labor and elected officials and so on.
In the meantime, you might want to check your ignorance and distaste for out-state Missouri. You do realize that Harris represents Columbia, right? There’s a lot more to this state than two cities, and if you think the St. Louis alone will decide this election, than you’re truly as clueless as you come off.
I do think this endorsement is bad news for Donnelly, since it suggests she hasn’t locked up her homebase, and doesn’t appear to be making strong inroads across the state. And if rich, blueblood Democrats in West County aren’t in the bag for her, then she’s likely got a lot of trouble ahead. Most Kansas City-area voters inherently distrust anyone from St. Louis, as do out-state voters, and then if she can’t even lock up her homebase, well, you can read the writing on the wall.
Odds are this race is going to be tight and hard fought, which is why anyone would be a fool to think for a moment that Koster has anything locked up, especially considering the totality of his record, his Republican history, and who he’s taking money from now. Just think about it, Jack: Everytime you say “prosecutor,” I can say “Republican who voted to cut Medicaid and for voter ID.” Which one do you think is more likely to sway Democratic voters. Not general election voters, but actual, honest-to-goodness Democratic primary voters?