Casino says place your bets — and leave your signature
The state’s gaming interests have found a captive audience for their latest initiative petition: gamblers.
As our Jeff City bureau chief, Virginia Young, reporter earlier, the Secretary of State’s office has approved the wording for a ballot question that would rescind the requirement that gamblers in Missouri casinos cannot buy more than $500 chips every two hours.
The casinos have until May 4 to get between 140,00 and 150,000 signatures to put the question before voters.
I have already seen signature gatherers on the City Hall steps, and they are probably outside other government buildings across the state.
Signature collectors this weekend were also at Lumiere Place, the new downtown casino. The location makes sense: Who would be more interested than casino patrons in getting rid of some of the restrictions placed on gambling in Missouri?
But what’s interesting is that instead of focusing their pitch on the changes in the wagering laws - telling gamblers, for instance, that they would be able to spend as much as they want without having to tote an ID card around - the signatures gathers at Lumiere Place stuck to the same appeal about how the initiative would help education.
Labeling the effort “Yes for Schools First,” the casinos have sought to highlight the portion of the initiative that would increase states taxes - from 20 percent to 21 percent - on casino revenues.
I wonder how many gamblers passed up signing the petition thinking it had something to do with schools, while grumbling about the loss limit that keeps them from betting more money at the tables.
At Lumiere Place, the house wants your money — and your signature


I think that most people who see petitions really haven’t a clue about the truth of the matter… whether they sign it, ask about it or pass it by.
Besides, telling people about schools pulls at the heart-strings, whereas telling people they’ll be able to bet more and with less difficulties, well, that has the possibility of upsetting some and maybe even making some gamblers wary - limits can be a good thing for addicts, and many addicts know it.
Signing a petition requires one to make a snap decision on something that they may or may not have already come to a conclusion about. Furthermore, asking the petitioner and/or reading the petition may not give the potential signer a good and proper understanding of what is being asked. This could especially be the case as many people are going to fell rushed, as they have somewhere to go and others might be stopping - and petitioners want as many people to sign as possible.
I experienced this when the stem-cell bill was going to be on the ballot a couple of years ago. I was stopped by a petitioner. I felt rushed, didn’t feel I had a complete grasp of what the petition’s position was and even felt like the petitioner might have been playing word games.
But hey, if people are willing to waste their money and spend their money on “entertainment” and the dream of getting rich, give them the needle. Just what this struggling economy needs; more dumb people with even less money to take care of their needs, requiring more government assistance.
And if people really think that Missouri’s educational system has benefited from casino taxation, it goes to show how uninformed the populous is… but as I said, tugging at the heart-strings, works every time.