Web Search powered by YAHOO! SEARCH
03.26.2008 12:50 pm

Clinton campaign picky about Missouri Dems

St. Louis Post-Dispatch
  • Email this
  • Print this

Republicans dealing with fervent Ron Paul supporters aren’t the only local political party having squabbles over delegates. 

The tough battle for the Democratic presidential nomination between senators Hillary Clinton and Barack Obama had some Missouri spillover this week as the Clinton campaign decided that some of the delegates elected at county caucuses were unworthy. On March 13, Democrats chose their county delegates, who will then choose delegates to the national convention at the congressional district level. The delegates might be even more important during a year in which neither candidate will win the pledged delegates necessary to secure the nomination and their could be a floor fight or brokered convention in Denver.

But many of the county folks who were elected to represent Clinton found out this week that they weren’t acceptable for some reason to the Clinton campaign. The Democratic Party sent the list of elected delegates to the campaigns, and the list of Clinton supporters came back with many names crossed out. One such delegate was former state rep Craig Hosmer, Greene County Democratic Party chairman. Hosmer says he doesn’t know why the Clinton camp had problems, but by Tuesday he was back on as a delegate. “As far as I know, we’re back on,” he said Wednesday. Hosmer speculated that part of the problem is that some of the delegates hadn’t been active in the Clinton campaign. As county party chairman, he had maintained public neutrality until the county caucus.

State Auditor Susan Montee, an Obama supporter, said the Obama camp didn’t disqualify any delegates elected at county caucuses.

As for Hosmer, he’s hopeful he’ll be elected to go to Denver. He thinks the tough primary campaign is good for the party. “I think it’s healthy,” he said.

10 comments

Comments are closed.

Oh, yeah?? Well…I’m picky about my Democratic nominee. And since this party’s all but over for Ms. Clinton, I sure wish she’d spare the party the grief that she continues to instigate and drop out of this contest. She cannot win the nomination, but she sure can make things more and more challenging for the eventual nominee. She’ll be a perfectly acceptable Senator from New York. Be satisfied with that, lady.

— gaydem
3:35 pm March 26th, 2008

Why isn’t the PD reporting this. I call Steve Parker but…

March 26, 2008
Missouri Head-to-Heads
Posted by BLAKE DVORAK
Rasmussen has new numbers for general election matchups in Missouri:

McCain 53 - Obama 38
McCain 50 - Clinton 41

As the saying goes, “as Missouri goes, so goes the election!”

— A CENTRIST
3:46 pm March 26th, 2008

Why is Clinton trying to exclude people. This is inconsistent with her stance on Florida and Michigan. She seems to be gaming the system. She should just get out the the race - she cannot win - all she can do now is hurt Democrats chances in the Fall.

— zingy
8:36 pm March 26th, 2008

To base the outcome of the general election in November on a poll taken in March is, well, ridiculous. These numbers are meaningless for all three candidates.

— Jade7243 Hussein
8:51 pm March 26th, 2008

A CENTRISTS,

All things are changing. Nothing will be as usual as far as presidential elections go this time around.

Clinton will not get the nomination. And, as far as McCain goes he will not win due to his continuance of the Bush regime. Once Hillary is out the way, Obama can concentrate on McCain and then his number will skyrocket. He will overcome McCain just find.

Also, isn’t it somewhat riduculous to even take seriously any poll numbers concerning if either Clinton or Obama could win against McCain when neither have truly concentrated on campaigning against him, but only against one another?

By the way, the Rev. Wright controversy did not really hurt Obama. Re. polls. No doubt, certainly this causes you much distress.

— D. Walker
9:14 pm March 26th, 2008

I have a dream…..Martin Luther…..Obama…. will come out second, but at least he tried.

— gigi
9:21 pm March 26th, 2008

Ha. The good Reverend may not hurt Senator Obama’s chances against Senator Clinton; but surely it is no coincidence that McCain has been pulling away from the Democratic morass. Obama has lost a sizeable lead over McCain.

I do think that Walker and gigi are correct in saying a March poll is unlikely to be an accurate representation of Missouri’s views in November. However, they are incorrect to suggest it is inconsequential.

The simple fact is that Democrats of all shades and creeds are realizing that they have little in common with their party mates. Liberal, pro-abortion elitists have little in common with African-American Christians or hark working union members. It is no surprise that some Democrats would consider choosing John McCain when their candidate loses.

November may be a long time coming, but this division will not heal easily. Plus, happily for McCain, why would any independent choose to join the Democratic calamity?

— J
10:07 am March 27th, 2008

D. Walker - actually you are not correct once again. After proper vetting of Sen. Obama, I have decided I can not vote for him. It think he sounds just like another divisive populist Democrat.
If you ever take the time to study Musolini (he is not in the bible), their rise to power stories are remarkably similar. Musolini presented himself as a blank slate populist and filled in the blanks later. Sound familiar yet?

However, if he wins the election, I have no problem with that. If this will satisfy the Democrats that all will now be right with the world and US with him being elected, I say fine - give him a shot. I am a true liberal in the “real” sense of the word. I won’t send hate rants to the PD.

— A CENTRIST
11:36 am March 27th, 2008

“For the first time, I have seen Osama bin Laden and General (David) Petraeus in agreement, … ” John McCain 3/24/2008

Who does McCain think he is? Throwing General Petraeus in with the Likes of Osama?

He is throwning Petraeus under the buss! He is playing the Iraq card!

Vote Ron Paul!

— RON PAUL FOR GOVERNOR
12:13 pm March 27th, 2008

Remember the old “in the First 100 Days we will do….by Nancy Pelosi. The Democrats are all talk and no action. Sorriest bunch I have seen.

I am tired of the Obama Clinton bru haha, all the while, McCain is cruising along to beat the Democrats again. Makes Ralph Nader look like a man with some sensible comments.

The election is for the Democrats to lose, and in my opinion, they have already lost it, both national and state wide.

— Donald Roy
3:15 pm March 28th, 2008