E-mail battles tally big price tag
Here’s a story by Jo Mannies on the site today that suggests taxpayers will foot a big bill for the fight over the governor’s office e-mail practices:
Today, apparently in response to the story, the Missouri Republican Party announced that it too was facing a big bill for an open-records request. (We especially appreciate the reference to “liberal media.”)
I’ll paste it here:
JEFFERSON CITY _ Now that the cost of Sunshine requests has become an issue in Missouri, the Missouri Republican Party felt obligated today to report that Robin Carnahan wants to charge nearly $100,000 for the e-mail records of one person and take six months to turn over her e-mails in response to an open records request by the GOP.
Notably the original request excluded e-mail attachments which significantly narrowed the request.
In a response to a Missouri Republican Party request dated November 27th for her e-mail records, Robin Carnahan said in a January 25th letter, after months of stonewalling: “Based on an estimate, it will cost approximately $91,000 and take a minimum of 6 months to sort, review for confidentiality under Chapter 621, and copy the records requested by the Missouri Republican State Committee. Our office will require payment of the above amount prior to you receiving the documents.”
To view the original request and final response click the following links: http://www.mogop.org/media/20071127sunshinerequest.pdf http://www.mogop.org/media/sunshinecostletter.pdf
“If the issue of Sunshine Law request costs is going to be discussed, then Missourians deserve to know what Democrats like Robin Carnahan are charging and how long it is taking them to respond,” said Paul Sloca, communications director for the Missouri Republican Party.
“Any liberal media reporting on this issue should include context and evaluate Democrat responses to Sunshine requests as well. More will follow on Jay Nixon’s legal maneuvering and stonewalling in response to Sunshine requests.” ###




Political editor of the St. Louis Post-Dispatch.
The big difference (or should I say HUGE) difference in these cases:
One is an investigative team appointed by a duly elected official to investigate another elected official.
The second is a private organization that is requesting documentation from the government.
The first is charged with what would be a government investigation. The second is no different than a private citizen.
The Mo Republicans have shown they are just asking for everything, not anything on a specific subject. However egregious their request, it is no different than if I went to city hall and asked for copies of some government records. It is their practice to charge something like 10 cents per page. If I put in a request for approximately one million pages of documents, I would not be surprised if I was placed with a $91,000 bill. So, really the Republican party can cry all they want to (it is, after all, their party and they can cry if they want to) but they are not above paying the same fees as you or I would for the same information.
Now, back to Master Matthew and his bills. If I, as a state employee or not, was being investigated for doing wrong on my job, do you think my employer would pay for my attorney bills while I fought my side? In addition, if I was being investigated for wrong doing, would I be able to charge the investigators for copies of any documents they requested? On both accounts, the answer is a resounding NO.
So, why is Blunt trying to get away with this.