Web Search powered by YAHOO! SEARCH
03.21.2008 12:18 pm

Ron Paul backers tangle with state GOP over caucus reports

Debbie Hopper, national field director for U.S. Rep. Ron Paul, R-Texas (and who is continuing his campaign for president), called Thursday to recount a contentious encounter that she had just had with Missouri Republican Party executive director Jared Craighead.

Hopper said that she had gone to the state party’s headquarters in Jefferson City on Thursday to look at the reports turned in by the various sites’ chairmen from last Saturday’s caucuses.

Craighead refused to allow Hopper to look at the reports. Hopper noted that next Tuesday is the deadline for challenging the reports’ content, or the proposed delegates approved at the caucuses and then OKed by the state party.

Hopper said she’s concerned that the state Republican Party is out to disenfranchise the Paul delegates selected at those caucuses, or that some of the caucus chairmen.

To briefly recap:

The Republican caucuses were held last Saturday around the state to select state delegates for the state GOP congressional caucuses in April and the state convention in May. (The state delegates help select the presidential delegates, and help shape the state party’s issues platform,)

As readers may be aware, Paul’s supporters came out in force. In sites where they were in the majority, the Paul contingents controlled the caucuses and elected their slates of delegates.

Hopper reaffirmed her side’s belief that the Paul supporters snagged about a third of the state delegates.

Click here to read the Post-Dispatch’s account, published Tuesday. 

Friday morning, Craighead made the following reply. “Accusations of anything underhanded going on are ludicrous,” he said. “We have not received all of the information from the local caucuses. We’re in the process of cataloguing and compiling the information. We’re not in a position to share it with anyone.”

Will the state party have the information available before Tuesday?

“It is unclear,” Craighead said.  He cited various roadblocks (including the Easter weekend). But among them: “It depends how fast the caucuses turn in their stuff.”

1 Star2 Stars3 Stars4 Stars5 Stars (47 votes, average: 4.96 out of 5)
Loading ... Loading ...
51 comments

Comments are closed.

Jared Craighead should go. The State Party had advanced warning that this was going to happen, they should have been prepared. Since Governor Blunt announced his decision to not run again Jared has been worried about his future (new house, new baby) and not focused on his job. And any time he can we works on Kenny Hulshof’s campaign for Governor because Andy Blunt is working for him and whatever Andy says Jared does. Andy is getting a 100K win bonus. Anyone want to speculate on why ethical Kenny said legislators and Governor’s family could own ethanol subsidized stock? You need wonder no longer.

I bet there will be some explaining to do during the next state meeting. Questionable expenditures and taking sides in the primary will definately be on the agenda. Jared should focus on his job for awhile.

— Cathcart
1:43 pm March 21st, 2008

There is something plainly unethical about not allowing “view only” access for party members (whom have a need to know) to this information. Even if the data on hand is not complete, the data the state party does have will not change except in challenge. Partial data is therefore useful for review.

There can only be one motive for not allowing access, and that is to prevent timely review. There can only be one motive to prevent timely review, and that is to prevent challenges. There can only be one motive to prevent challenges, and that is to prevent “mistakes” from being corrected.

One can therefore reason that if there is a motive to prevent mistakes from being corrected, then those mistakes must be there intentionally. Fraud is not only actionable within the party… but would have potential criminal consequence as well.

— mbarnes
2:25 pm March 21st, 2008

IDo hope the STL today stays on top of this story. American politics and the process need transparency and a lot more credibility regarding elections and the process. I hope Ron Paul in this state file challenge of the reports should the Party not issue results by Monday afternoon. The issues of credibility and integrity are too high for errors or willful actions of a few party lifers.

— tim, minnesota
2:27 pm March 21st, 2008

Sounds like Mr. Craighead is being deliberately obstructive, and one has to wonder what he has to hide. He obviously intends to keep all the caucus reports hidden away until the deadline for challenging them has passed. Why have such a deadline at all, if the reports cannot be scrutinized before it passes? If Craighead is not doing something fraudulent and possibly criminal, he should certainly waive any “deadline” for challenges until after the reports have been released and possible challengers have had a reasonable amount of time to examine them.

— Dabooda
2:27 pm March 21st, 2008

Open Source elections and Open Source Government.
’nuff said.

— Tom Cody
2:35 pm March 21st, 2008

The reason for a deadline is to prevent arguing to go on ad infinitum. Fraudulent results can be perpetrated by simply arguing until your opposition runs out of energy or resources. Therefore moving the deadline is no answer. The only answer for HONEST results is for the state party to provide immediate, and open access to all information as soon as it is available. Any other action can only be motivated by fraud or incompetence. Fraud by incompetence, is still fraud.

— mbarnes
2:41 pm March 21st, 2008

I know Kenny Hulshof personally and hopefully he’s not an untouchable Repube now so I suppose I will lay the hammer down on him. This is total BS!

— Rob
2:56 pm March 21st, 2008

Does Craighead have ties to GOP mobster Jack Abramoff? Based on my internet browing, apparently he does.

If he is not careful, he may be serving time himself is he commits criminal activity.

I think that the first thing the Missouri GOP must do is rid itself of corruption.

— A Concerned Citizen
3:01 pm March 21st, 2008

This Craighead character is apparently yet another Likudnik mole attempting to thwart the true Conservatives of this country from getting an honest election. The Israeli-backed Neocons want Hillary versus McCain, and they will do anything to achieve that goal.

— Alan Cabal
3:10 pm March 21st, 2008

According to the Missouri GOP Rules and the Call to Convention all Local Caucus delegate lists and other vital information have to be sent via email or mail to his office within 72 hours of the caucus adjournment. Why then, 2 days after this deadline, is he “still waiting for county results” ? All he is doing is giving time for people to mess with lists and pull the “Old Guard” Republican tricks. Why are they so afraid of Real Conservatives?

At the Jackson County Caucus, there were 41 people signed on the register that were not present in the meeting. Yes, THAT voter register the County Committee Chairman STOLE from the caucus members. I’ll give you one guess which side those 41 phantom people were from. They were not on the side of the Ron Paul Conservative Values slate - just to narrow it down.

— Kent in KC
3:15 pm March 21st, 2008

Pages: [1] 2 3 4 5 6 » Show All

Jo Mannies