Web Search powered by YAHOO! SEARCH
03.21.2008 12:18 pm

Ron Paul backers tangle with state GOP over caucus reports

Debbie Hopper, national field director for U.S. Rep. Ron Paul, R-Texas (and who is continuing his campaign for president), called Thursday to recount a contentious encounter that she had just had with Missouri Republican Party executive director Jared Craighead.

Hopper said that she had gone to the state party’s headquarters in Jefferson City on Thursday to look at the reports turned in by the various sites’ chairmen from last Saturday’s caucuses.

Craighead refused to allow Hopper to look at the reports. Hopper noted that next Tuesday is the deadline for challenging the reports’ content, or the proposed delegates approved at the caucuses and then OKed by the state party.

Hopper said she’s concerned that the state Republican Party is out to disenfranchise the Paul delegates selected at those caucuses, or that some of the caucus chairmen.

To briefly recap:

The Republican caucuses were held last Saturday around the state to select state delegates for the state GOP congressional caucuses in April and the state convention in May. (The state delegates help select the presidential delegates, and help shape the state party’s issues platform,)

As readers may be aware, Paul’s supporters came out in force. In sites where they were in the majority, the Paul contingents controlled the caucuses and elected their slates of delegates.

Hopper reaffirmed her side’s belief that the Paul supporters snagged about a third of the state delegates.

Click here to read the Post-Dispatch’s account, published Tuesday. 

Friday morning, Craighead made the following reply. “Accusations of anything underhanded going on are ludicrous,” he said. “We have not received all of the information from the local caucuses. We’re in the process of cataloguing and compiling the information. We’re not in a position to share it with anyone.”

Will the state party have the information available before Tuesday?

“It is unclear,” Craighead said.  He cited various roadblocks (including the Easter weekend). But among them: “It depends how fast the caucuses turn in their stuff.”

1 Star2 Stars3 Stars4 Stars5 Stars (47 votes, average: 4.96 out of 5)
Loading ... Loading ...
51 comments

Comments are closed.

I hope my nose is wrong but this smells like criminal wrongdoing in the making. This is going to cause nothing but trouble for state Republican candidates.

— Jim McClarin
8:34 pm March 21st, 2008

They are playing chicken.

If the Paul campaign files a successful legal challenge, I believe the result might be loss of ballot access for the GOP in Missouri. The Paul campiagn might back off.

We should make it clear that WE won’t, and if they don’t file the challenge, we will. I’ll call the NJ ACLU president tomorrow. I’m sure they would love to take the case if Craighead pulls a fast one.

The primary used state election apparatus. Violation of their own by-laws is grounds for loss of ballot access in the next election. That would be the upcoming presidential election.

— Dave
8:35 pm March 21st, 2008

Here’s where attorneys should be brought to handle. This is usurpation of power and it shoun’t be tolerated at any cost. This puts the lectoral process in this country at the level of a banana republic.

— kindofmild
11:23 pm March 21st, 2008

So Debbie… when would you like us to show up in Jefferson City for moral and vocal support ? I live 20 minutes away and can be there no problem.

Coming Soon….

PROJECT SUNSHINE… Sending the grey coulds over to the McCain camp…!

— Ramblin Randy
11:36 pm March 21st, 2008

We the People standing up for themselves could make it more expensive for the globalist to install their puppets.

— Carson
4:48 am March 22nd, 2008

Gravel Kucinich Paul Nader
will help
Jared Craighead
clear roadblocks
to SHARE
‘ludicrous’ truth.

— GravelKucinichPaulNader
6:32 am March 22nd, 2008

What’s funny about the Ron Paul backers on here is that they proclaim to be interested in the ideas of freedom and democracy, and that they are all about the ‘power of the people.’

Yet, the rules they are pushing would strip the results of the primary, and the rules that were understood and accepted by all beforehand, and replace them with results and rules that better represent what they want. In short, they want to change the score of the game after everyone should be off the field.

A heck of an idea on listening the the voice of the people, huh?

— Nick Haynes
7:35 am March 22nd, 2008

Nick Haynes, the delegates that went to the County conventions were elected BY THE PEOPLE IN THEIR PRECINCTS. It doesn’t get any more grass roots, for the people, than that. This is something that the political hacks on the top CANNOT manipulate.

Do your homework next time you make such a silly comment next time.

— A Concerned Citizen
10:12 am March 22nd, 2008

I called the Secretary of State. Our recourse as the TRUE REPUBLICANS is to file personal lawsuits against the Party. I’m DOING IT!

— Blue KC
10:23 am March 22nd, 2008

I would like to have some advice from anyone with a legal background. I am planning on submitting an injunction by Tuesday morning. I would like to know where these need to be submitted and how it should be worded.

Thank you in advance,
A Jackson County Delegate wanting to know if he was disenfranchised

— Delegate
11:00 am March 22nd, 2008

Pages: « 1 2 [3] 4 5 6 » Show All