Web Search powered by YAHOO! SEARCH
04.03.2008 10:43 am

Ben Stein, like Darwin, evolves

St. Louis Post-Dispatch
  • Email this
  • Print this

Hollywood actor/producer Ben Stein, known for his bit role in the classic film “Ferris Bueller’s Day Off” has gotten a bit grayer since he famously called roll as a teacher in that 1986 film, but he’s got the same old dry wit.

He’s funny without even trying. In the House Lounge before a news conference where Stein was pumping up his new film and advocating for state Rep. Jane Cunningham’s Emily Brooker bill, Stein stood to the side of the podium looking for one of his producers.

“Walt? … Walt? … Walt?” Unlike Bueller, Walt showed up. Stein’s film, which was shown in the Capitol rotunda last night, promotes the concept that those in academia who want to question Darwin’s Theory of Evolution, or teach intelligent design, are being discriminated against. Stein calls Darwin “brilliant” but said even the famous scientist had questions about his work. He and Cunningham say all they’re pushing is freedom.

“Nothing can be questioned about Darwin or you are in severe academic jeopardy,” Stein said. We’d like to keep the debate going.”

Standing up with Cunningham and Stein were University of Missouri-Columbia professor John Marshall and Brooker, the former Missouri State University student who sued MSU after being questioned in a Star Chamber atmoshphere by various social work professors who questioned her Christian beliefs.

Brooker settled her suit out of court, and since her complaint was made to MSU, the university has investigated its social work program and reassigned several professors. Others left on their own.

Brooker said the university administration “responded overwhelmingly positively to me” after her lawsuit. Asked at the news conference if that is an indication that no legislation is needed to guarantee academic freedom, she said she believes discrimination against Christians at MSU and other universities is still “widespread.”

Before Stein’s appearance, he was quite the hit in the Capitol hallways, stopping to take pictures with various representatives. Republicans Bob Dixon, Wayne Cooper and Jason Smith got in on the celebrity action.

11 comments

Comments are closed.

Jane Cunningham wants “intellectual diversity” like she wants people with “weird” haircuts. Has anyone here read the bill linked above? What a joke.

— Darren01
12:14 pm April 3rd, 2008

For a reality check, take a look at http://www.expelledexposed.com/ to see how these liars and swindlers are trying to ruin science education.

— frank
12:25 pm April 3rd, 2008

Darren, thanks for pointing out the link. I read the bill and I agree with you. I found parts of the bill to be redundant and the over all message to be ambiguous. The history behind this bill is somewhat interesting and I believe it was written with good intentions. However the phrase “intellectual diversity” is not properly defined and is a concept that can be easily abused. This bill, while not exactly the same, has a similar tone to the phony “Academic Freedom” bills which occasionally find an ear in southern states.

— Kevin
1:51 pm April 3rd, 2008

I’m a practicing Catholic. I believe in evolution. I do not feel discriminated against.

I think the only people that feel we need more government regulations are the same people that wear their religion on their sleeves.

Maybe the wacko fringe protestant mega church groups feel people don’t understand them but true Christians are just fine.

What a joke.

— Sam
3:04 pm April 3rd, 2008

How you could be against the Emily Brooker Bill is absolutely beyond me, and apparently the Florida State Legislature which the bill was modeled after. Yes I’ve read the text how could you possible be against consolidating freedom of speech and ideals in Academia… MU has already adopted it as their doctrine because the senate failed to get it to a vote, and they saw greater potential to protect every student. I think the arguments have more to do with the bill’s sponsor than the bills themselves. Understandable that rep. Cunningham is a very polarizing person but the personal attacks on STLTODAY are ridiculous and only help to serve that your claims are completely bias. That goes for any politician

— Kurt
3:28 pm April 3rd, 2008

Kurt, in the abstract sense of “intellectual diversity” I agree with you. Of course various viewpoints should be able to have their day in the public forum. Absolutely.
However, these people don’t want diversity at all. They want to be protected from the true marketplace of ideas that universities should be, and want special treatment.
Jane Cunningham showed her true colors just the other day by throwing a couple of young people out of her office who wanted to discuss some legislation with her, apparently because she didn’t like the way they looked. This isn’t the behavior of someone interested in either the intellect or diversity.
Cunningham and her ilk want to control the free expression of ideas in the classroom. They don’t trust teachers or professors to do their jobs. Ironic, isn’t it, that these “conservatives” want to inject their more government regulation into our lives by micromanaging education?

— Darren01
8:11 pm April 3rd, 2008

YOU GO DARREN01! How dare anyone question your beliefs that Rep. Cunningham,and Dr. Cooper are wackos! You must be correct as you have a computer and can write in english! Who needs diversity or differing opinions.
In fact…how dare any of us even respond to on of your posts? We should practice your model of tolerance and just read and believe in the teachings of Darren01!
You have no idea how foolish and closed minded you are do you? Watch the world and learn. You have very little to teach any of us Darren01.

— Joy Tample
9:35 am April 4th, 2008

I could teach you some grammar, Joy, but apparently you think the grammar teachers are just spewing liberal drivel.
Buy a comma and come back so we can hear more.

— Darren01
12:33 pm April 4th, 2008

Sponsorproblem-when a bill has merit but the sponsor does not.

— Lexicon
9:58 pm April 4th, 2008

I thought Joy’s message was both pithy and grammatically correct. I am sorry Darren01, but where exactly would you put a comma in her hasty, but humorous remarks?

“Buy a comma!” Ha, what brilliant repartee. I am sure it is not possible that you responded arrogantly in the heat of the moment.

By the way, a little academic freedom would be nice at the university level. This is especially true for those of us that have attended college and do not agree with the mainstream view that God is dead. Why is everyone so afraid to consider the Christian perspective or to do more than simply dismiss intelligent design theories? I hold that it is because the truth is a little too frightening.

— j
8:39 am April 5th, 2008

Pages: [1] 2 » Show All