Web Search powered by YAHOO! SEARCH
04.17.2008 5:46 pm

House endorses sales tax increase for veterans

Over the objections of some anti-tax Republicans, the House today overwhelmingly voted for a proposed constitutional amendment that would increase the state sales tax by one-eighth of a cent. That money would fund programs for veterans.

After the vote, House Speaker Rod Jetton told reporters that many members were conflicted over the measure and that a tax increase was “a last resort.”

“Everyone feels a sense of responsibility to our veterans,” he said.

The House voted 106-39 to forward the measure to the Senate. With a yes vote in that chamber, it would be placed on November’s ballot.

Jetton said legislators could be criticized no matter how they voted.

“At some point, the campaign is over and the governance starts,” he said. “This is an issue – you just hate to see it bleed into a campaign.”

But, of course, issues like this often do bleed into campaigns. House Democrats sent a critical press release Thursday, noting that several Republicans voted for the measure, even though they had signed a no-tax pledge from the group Americans for Tax Reform.

The sponsor of HJR 71, state Rep. Barney Fisher, R-Richard, was among those who signed and violated the State Taxpayer Protection Pledge put forth by Americans for Tax Reform, a group based in Washington, D.C., that advocates for lower taxes. HJR 41 now goes to the Senate.

In addition to Fisher, the other Republicans who signed and violated the pledge: State Reps. Mike Dethrow of Alton, Doug Funderbunk of St. Peters, Steve Hunter of Joplin, Allen Icet of Wildwood, Van Kelly of Norwood, Bob Nance of Excelsior Springs, Brian Nieves of Washington, John Quinn of Chillicothe, Vicki Schneider of O’Fallon, and Joe Smith of St. Charles.

The State Taxpayer Protection Pledge says: “I, _____, pledge to the taxpayers of the _____ District of the State of _____ and to all the people of this state, that I will oppose and vote against any and all efforts to increase taxes.” A list of pledge signatories can be found at the Americans for Tax Reform Web site at www.atr.org. ATR considers the pledge binding as long as the signer remains in office.

(In the first graf, the release flubbed on the bill number. The amendment is actually HJR 71. Maybe it’s a Freudian slip, but Democrats also have widely criticized the incorrect bill number, HJR 41.)

Rep. Brian Yates, R-Lee’s Summit, was one of the conflicted legislators.

“This is a tough time to be talking about sales tax increases,” he said. “I don’t think it’s the right thing to do to go and ask citizens for more money.”

During debate, Yates motioned to have the bill sent back to committee. The motion was defeated handily, but Jetton could be seen angrily looking in Yates’ direction and mouthing what looked like, “I’ll talk to you later.”

1 Star2 Stars3 Stars4 Stars5 Stars (No Ratings Yet)
Loading ... Loading ...
7 comments

Comments are closed.

I hate taxes, but I don’t mind this one.

— right-2B-right
8:04 pm April 17th, 2008

I hate taxes, I love veterans, but this stinks. The legitimate needs of veterans should be met by the federal government. The last thing working families need is yet another tax.

— Nick Kasoff
8:18 pm April 17th, 2008

Yes, the federal government should be doing more but they arn\’t, so does that mean that Missouri should sit back and let them do without? I don\’t think so. First, these people did not vote for a tax increase, they voted to let people vote…the ultimate in local control. Our veterans need help and this will give it to them. I don\’t like taxes either, but I commend these men and women for looking for ways to help veterans.

— Crazy
7:04 am April 18th, 2008

I agree with Nick. Veteran’s issues should be addressed at the federal level. Instead of saddling all Missourians with a sales tax, I would prefer a donation option on state tax forms.

— Go_Fish
9:06 am April 18th, 2008

The House has said that “we the people” should have the opportunity to decide whether we want to support the veterans’ with this sales tax. If we say “no” then it won’t happen. If we say “yes, and only if we say “yes” will the taxes go up.

It’s clear House democrats are very desparate to attack Republicans on this one. 42 of democrats voted for it and only 16 voted against it. Of course there were those that “walked”.

I contribute to the ATR and I don’t count this as a breaking the pledge action.

— Jackson
6:21 pm April 18th, 2008

It’s interesting to me that we are simultaneously considering a tax increase and offering millions, wait, make that hundreds of millions of dollars in tax credit to the Bombardier deal. I’d like to get off the merry-go-round now. It is going to hurt working class families, it could even cost jobs. If the entire point of the Bombardier credit is to create jobs, it seems more than a little counteractive to increase taxes. If this is a priority, and it should be, why aren’t we making that appropriation to veterans now and then looking at what’s left over for tax incentives?

— benini
11:39 am April 21st, 2008

Hey Jackson…you’re kidding us, right? You call democrats desperate yet your pitiful defense of whether or not there is a violation of the ATR sounds like something desperate Brian Nieves would say. Maybe I am not reading it correctly and maybe I need you to explain what the following means “…I will oppose and vote against any and all efforts to increase taxes…”. So eventhough this is not an actual vote to actually raise the taxes, it is in my book it’s an actual vote on an actual effort to increase taxes. Let’s see how the two of you spin this one.

— Trixie from Union, MO
2:24 pm April 21st, 2008