Web Search powered by YAHOO! SEARCH
04.18.2008 4:57 pm

More details on Hulshof’s ethics package

  • Email this
  • Print this

As Jo previewed (and I hinted at), Kenny Hulshof unveiled a package of ethics proposals today.

The take away news is that Hulshof now supports keeping campaign finance limits – he just wants them higher. But, he said a repeal of the limits would be better than the current system.

“The current system we have is broken,” he told reporters in Jefferson City. “Unlimited contributions is an improvement over the current system. There is a better alternative even yet.”

Hulshof had said he would sign a bill moving through the Legislature that would repeal the limits. Both his GOP primary opponent, State Treasurer Sarah Steelman, and his potential general election foe, Democratic Attorney General Jay Nixon, oppose removing the limits.

Hulshof also discussed several other proposals. One would ban gifts from lobbyists to anyone who works in his administration. He also called on the legislature to ban gifts to all elected officials.

(Sen. Joan Bray and Rep. Rachel Bringer agree with him on this point, but their bills have not yet received committee hearings.)

Hulshof said the ban is modeled after federal guidelines. The ban would include one-on-one meals, but legislators could, for instance, attend a 25-person dinner or another “widely attended event.”

Hulshof also underscored that he would bid out all of the state’s license fee offices. But, as our own Tony Messenger reported, that process might mean that many current contract-holders will keep their contract.

The patronage system is “going to end under my administration,” Hulshof said today. “All offices will be bid. Period.”

Hulshof also called for an ethics task force that would meet during the first six months of 2009. The group would formulate other proposals that could be presented for the 2010 legislative session.

5 comments

Comments are closed.

If you are going to bid out the fee offices, it only stands to reason that some of the current contract holders would keep their contracts. Unless they have failed to live up to the terms of their current contracts, why would you bar them from bidding? And obviously, if they can bid, they can win - and would have some advantage in the bidding, since they already know the business, own the equipment, have a lease on the office space, etc.

— Nick Kasoff
7:53 pm April 18th, 2008

So is Kenny for increasing the campaign contribution limits or against? Or does he want to change them? Your coverage and the headlines on the John Combest blog are VERY CONFUSING. Doesn’t sound like Congressman Kenny can make up his mind. Can John Hancock please clarify?

— VERY CONFUSED
8:01 am April 19th, 2008

Sounds like he wants to do away with the limits…..

— Lee
11:06 am April 19th, 2008

I few years ago I heard an idea floating around to give first bids for fee offices to not for profits, this seems like a no-brainer, why isn’t any one proposing this anymore?

— Brian
2:22 pm April 19th, 2008

Missouri needs good fee offices, run efficiently. Hulshof would allow anyone to bid on them, non-profits or individuals. His focus is clearly on customer service, not scoring political points.

— Paul S
10:05 pm April 19th, 2008