Web Search powered by YAHOO! SEARCH
04.11.2008 7:07 pm

Nominated “Democrat” to Mo Ethics drops out

The AP’s David Lieb is reporting that Gov. Matt Blunt’s latest nominee to the Missouri Ethics Commission, Jefferson City attorney Michael Schmid, is withdrawing his name.

Schmid — a law partner to gubernatorial brother Andy Blunt — cited lack of support from the Missouri Democratic Party, which challenged Schmid’s status as a Democrat. Blunt had named him to a Democratic post on the bipartisan commission.

“In the past few days, it has become apparent that my nomination to the commission does not have the support of my party,” Schmid said in a letter to the governor. “I am therefore withdrawing my application for the appointment.”
 
Blunt spokeswoman Nanci Gonder told the AP that the governor had accepted Schmid’s withdrawal.

When told of Schmid’s departure, state Democratic Party spokesman Jack Cardetti said, “We plan to resubmit names to the governor early next week.”

By law, different members of the sixc-person commission hail from specified congressional districts. Three must be from each major party.

  Cardetti said that the 4th District Democratic committee had submitted two names to the governor, but the two people dropped out for various reasons. Blunt then chose Schmid.

Questions about Schmid’s party bona fides, made this week, reflect a frequent line of attack by both state parties for several years.

When Democrats Mel Carnahan and Bob Holden were governor, the state GOP often raised questions about their Republican nominees to various panels. At one point, Republican leaders demanded that the Democratic governors make their GOP picks only from candidate lists assembled by the GOP.

Apparently the state Democratic Party — which often has been accused of letting Blunt name “questionable” Democrats to posts (such as the Mizzou curators, for example) – is starting to get more militant about such matters, especially since Blunt now is a lame duck.

According to the AP, “Schmid told The Associated Press on Friday that he had conversations with several members of the Democratic Party after his nomination, but declined to identify anyone in particular….”
 
The AP said that Schmid had given $250 in campaign donations to Attorney General Jay Nixon, the Democratic candidate for governor.
 
“Schmid said he made that contribution after he already had applied for the Ethics Commission position _ partly to demonstrate his Democratic credentials, and partly because he would have been barred from making political contributions once he became a member of the Ethics Commission,” the AP reported.

1 Star2 Stars3 Stars4 Stars5 Stars (No Ratings Yet)
Loading ... Loading ...
5 comments

Comments are closed.

Jo, as an active member of the Franklin County Dems I had questions back in 2006 about one Brad Mitchell from Washington, Mo. Blunt appointed him to the Missouri Ethics Commission too. At that time he was VP of the Bank of Washington, owned by the staunchest of area Republican backers. But what was most odd is no one in the local party establishment had ever heard of him. He never came to any meetings or any other party functions. He was invited to keep us up to date on his work on the ethics commission but it never happened. Quite the mystery, that.

http://www.gov.mo.gov/press/EthicsComm042106.htm

— Rp
8:34 am April 13th, 2008

I just posted my take on this on our county blog:

http://tinyurl.com/3nsntm

— Rp
11:08 am April 13th, 2008

As an Independent it’s my concern that having Democrats and Republicans only on the Missouri Ethics Commission is sort of like having the inmates have keys. In order to effectively administer this commission, a nonpartisan group should be overseeing the ethics of both parties especially since both Democrats and Republicans too often have difficulties with ethical behavior.

Since we’re on the subject, how about our elections being administered by a nonpartisan Board of Election Commissioners? Asking anyone to perform self-policing is just asking for scandal, cover-up and dare I say it……. unethical behavior.

— Barbara
12:18 pm April 13th, 2008

What Ethics are left and what ethics have they enforced lately? Appreciate an answer cause I want my money back from Mike Evans who broke laws every time he took a contribution as he was not legally qualified by state stature and he deserves sued for his antics and embarressment he gave the Democratic Party in this state. Thanks I appreciate your column.

— What Ethics
12:59 am April 14th, 2008

Did you see the headlines today WhatEthics? First they don’t have the Federal Elections Commission up and running since they can’t agree on the Dems and Repubs to sit on it. How convenient for both parties not to have any sort of oversight commission……..even if it isn’t very effective anyway.

Then, an article on who owes what to the IRS. A lot of familiar names and faces owe us a lot of money and are sliding by while we ordinary folks are working hard to make ends meet.

Let Hillary and McCain say what they will…….Obama is right in that we are bitter……and pissed off.

Ethics? There are no ethics for most politicians.

— Barbara
6:25 am April 14th, 2008