Web Search powered by YAHOO! SEARCH
05.07.2008 3:04 pm

UPDATE: Blunt goes after Democratic AG candidate, who is grateful

Today, Gov. Matt Blunt’s office announced that it “is seeking e-mails and e-mail backup tapes from a state representative who has purported to be a champion of Missouri’s Sunshine Act.”

That legislator is state Rep. Jeff Harris, D-Columbia and one of three Democrats vying for Missouri attorney general.

In what could be seen as a gift to Harris as he courts the Democratic base (which is no fan of the Republican governor),   Blunt’s office said it had filed a Sunshine request seeking Harris’ e-mails and other related documents.

  “Representative Harris has claimed to be a strong advocate for the Sunshine Act and open government so we hope and expect he will demonstrate this commitment by providing the information we have requested in this open records request,” said Blunt chief of staff Trish Vincent.

Here’s the formal request:

“Pursuant to Chapter 610, RSMo., the governor’s office is requesting copies or the opportunity to inspect the following:

  • “Every e-mail sent to or from the e-mail address “jeff.harris@house.mo.gov” since January 2003;
  • “Copies of all e-mail back-up tapes or other storage mechanism for the e-mail address “jeff.harris@house.mo.gov” since January 2003;
  • “Every document created on a state of Missouri owned computer assigned to Rep. Jeff Harris or a member of his staff since January 2003; and 
  • “Every document received by Rep. Jeff Harris or a member of his staff pursuant to law or in connection with their official duties since January 2003. 
               
  • ” In the open records request, Ms. Vincent noted that some members of the Missouri House of Representatives may have taken the position that the Sunshine Act does not apply to them.  

   “ ‘I am confident that you will agree the act applies to you,” Vincent wrote to Harris.  “I hope I can count on you to take every necessary step to ensure that this request is met with a full and complete response.”

UPDATE:

Harris just responded with an e-release that accuses of the governor’s office of engaging in a “shameless political ploy” to divert attention from Blunt’s own legal problems over office e-mails.

“I have always been willing to stand up to this Governor when important principles are at stake,” said Harris. “I will continue to call for him to be held accountable for his alleged illegal actions in ordering the destruction of public records after a Sunshine law request had been filed with his office.”

Harris noted that he has sponsored the Sunshine Law Electronic Upgrade Act, “which made clear that electronic records like emails fell under the Sunshine Law.”

“During this session, Harris has sponsored HB 2177 that would make it easier to prove Sunshine Law violations and would have expanded the scope of the law to include emails sent on wireless devices, campaign accounts, and other private accounts that directly pertained to public business. Harris has also pledged to create a Sunshine Law Enforcement Unit when he is elected Attorney General.”

Harris added that he “will comply with Blunt’s request, but he questioned obvious political motives behind the request.

“Blunt’s request came just one day after Harris, in a speech on the House floor, commended two state employees for standing up to the governor, whose office investigators allege made an illegal request to destroy public documents,” Harris noted.

UPDATE UPDATE:

Harris called later to say that he was proud of being targeted by Blunt.

 ”They clearly don’t want me to be the next attorney general,” Harris said, “And I consider that a badge of honor.”

1 Star2 Stars3 Stars4 Stars5 Stars (1 votes, average: 1 out of 5)
Loading ... Loading ...
12 comments

Comments are closed.

This is getting silly now. There are less than two weeks left in the session, and our governor and his staff are playing games like this. Is the lesson here that if you criticize the governor you will be targeted with a petty attack like this? How is the public expected to respect our elected officials, namely the governor, when his office behaves like this? What is there to be gained by requiring Representative Harris and his staff to compile all their emails since 2003 and provide these to the Governor’s Office? Think about the time involved in compiling these, when there is no real purpose other than to try and make Representative Harris look bad.

I am ready for the partisan, petty fighting in Jefferson City to come to an end and actual progress to be made to move our state forward. Maybe this will happen after the election this fall.

— truman
8:46 pm May 7th, 2008

Wow. As if this whole debacle hasn’t been ridiculous enough. Free advertisement for Harris in his AG primary fight, who wouldn’t take it?

Boy guv is on a roll now. I can’t wait to see what he does next.

— jj
8:56 am May 8th, 2008

I think it’s funny! I highly doubt that Blunt, Inc. expects to find anything out of the ordinary with Harris’ computer files — however, I think they’re just trying to prove a point that if Harris or his staff EVER deleted a SINGLE email, he’s nothing more than a hypocrite.

Anyone who knows Harris already knows this, though. Perhaps Blunt’s administration just wants to make certain everyone who DOESN’T know Harris is informed.

— Jim (the republican)
9:41 am May 8th, 2008

Golly, Jim. Seems you don’t know Harris very well then, nevermind much about the Sunshine Law and Blunt’s apparent lawbreaking. The issue with Blunt isn’t whether or not he pressed the delete key himself, but rather that he apparently ordered state employees to destroy backup files.

What Blunt is doing here is shameful and a waste of taxdollars. He should just handover the backup tapes and let us all know what he has to hide. Harris has already said he’ll comply with the request. So why won’t Blunt?

FYI, I used to be Shecky, but for some reason I wasn’t able to register with that name.

— lamecat
10:21 am May 8th, 2008

Yep, it’s silly season — and our silly governor is up to his antics. I’d suppose it’s fairly obvious that the guv doesn’t want that suppoenaed information out there, if he didn’t care, then why would he go to such lengths to suppress it? I just don’t think this is all about “entertainment value” for the citizenry!

It’s all just as well, I am sure Rep. Harris can turn it into political theater — make a big production of handing over the tapes, and then challenge the guv to do the same.

We all should thank the Blunts, Missouri’s answer to the Bush dynasty, for producing this latest in their long series of political “entertainment.”

Heck, if he keeps it up, Governor Blunt can achieve approval ratings right up there with the President! Isn’t that something we all can cheer about?

— Jim(not a republican)
11:23 am May 8th, 2008

shecky, have you ever actually watched Harris in action? He’s a crybaby!

I’ve never given Blunt a pass on this issue, but I will state that it would be my bet that almost EVERY elected official has deleted emails in one fashion or another, and mostly as a matter of convenience, as opposed to political expediency.

My guess would also be that Harris has done so, as well, and Blunt’s staff is merely trying to point out his hypocrisy on the issue.

— Jim (the republican)
11:29 am May 8th, 2008

Jim the Republican,

Just so you don’t spout off any more lame reasoning I would like to enlighten you a bit: You are allowed to delete emails. Deleted emails are kept in a “deleted emails” file, which Jeff has not tampered with. What is a problem is trying to get rid of the “deleted emails” file. The Governor has done that, not Jeff.

— Liz
12:29 pm May 8th, 2008

Liz, I’m sure the House Computer Center has managed to keep archived copies of everything Jeff Harris or his staff may have deleted, but it doesn’t answer the question as to whether or not Harris himself has deleted such files from his computers.

House staff is required to keep such information for a set period of time. Has that time expired?

— Jim (the republican)
12:32 pm May 8th, 2008

I can’t wait to see what turns up when Matty is forced to unearth what he sent his staffers to destroy from the backups. I’m sure it will be vastly more titillating than anything they will pull out of Mr. Harris’ account and will clearly point to the real reasons OTB made his One Term moniker a self-fulfilling prophecy. In the meantime, you can’t buy this kind of campaign coverage, particularly when you’re bogged down in the 3-way primary contest. Knowing Jeff Harris, he should come out of this smelling like a rose and miles ahead of the other AG contenders come November.

— Penelope
1:07 pm May 8th, 2008

Jim, Blunt did try to delete emails as a matter of political expediency. First they said they no longer existed. Then when the AP asked for the backup tapes, Blunt and/or his staff ordered that data destroyed. Then, considering that data was part of a lawsuit, and we’ve moved into a very possible conspiracy to destroy evidence — and potentially evidence of criminal wrongdoing. Nevermind anything at all to do with the preservation of public documents and records as mandated by the Sunshine Law.

And what is Blunt’s response to these very real allegations? To try to muddy the water and deflect the blame. Sorry, Jim, but that ain’t gonna cut it. Harris will end up complying with this, and Blunt will continue looking like the petulant, deplorable leader he is.

As for Harris, I’ve always found him to be a passionate, strong-minded leader, who’s not afraid of a fight. Of course, I’m sure that standing up working families and the little guy sounds like whining to your elephant ears.

— shecky
1:25 pm May 8th, 2008

Matt Blunt and his mouthpiece are utter and total mediocrities. January 2009 cannot come quick enough!

— gaydem
4:09 pm May 8th, 2008

If I’m not mistaken, the taxpayers are paying for all this. Blunt’s already got 2 lawsuits against him for breaking the Sunshine Law. How ’bout we use our money for something a bit more reasonable than baby games between rivals?

— Deborah
11:25 pm May 8th, 2008