Web Search powered by YAHOO! SEARCH
05.27.2008 3:32 pm

Blunt, health foundation spar over uninsured

St. Louis Post-Dispatch
  • Email this
  • Print this

Gov. Matt Blunt took issue with the Missouri Foundation of Health today, not long after the foundation announced its new Web site dedicated to informing Missourians about the plight of the uninsured. The undercurrent of the dispute, of course, continues to be Blunt’s criticism of Democrat Attorney General Jay Nixon, the presumptive Democratic nominee for governor in 2008, a seat Blunt is no longer seeking.

First, the news: The health foundation, a private not-for-profit group created by a legal dispute between the state and Blue Cross and Blue Shield, is setting up a new Web site, www.covermissouri.org, to research and propose policy directives related to decreasing the number of uninsured in Missouri.

Blunt, however, took the opportunity to issue a news release today accusing the foundation of being controlled by Nixon. Indeed, Nixon does appoint advisory board members which ultimately have a say in the make-up of the foundation’s board. And the foundation has given grants to organizations that are generally in tune with Nixon’s gubernatorial campaign.

But most interesting about Blunt’s news release today was his allegation that the foundation has “declined” to partner with the state.

That’s partially true, says foundation President and CEO Dr. James Kimmey.

Back in December, when he was still running for governor, Blunt asked Kimmey’s organization for what Kimmey termed about “80 percent of our funding for the next 10 years.” Kimmey says the board met and refused Blunt’s request.

In a letter to the governor, Kimmey pointed out that the foundation regularly funds state programs.

“It was an unusual request,” Kimmey said today. “I dare say unprecedented. … A lot of this, I think, has to do with the gubernatorial campaign.”

See the letters between Blunt and the Foundation here.

15 comments

Comments are closed.

I’m sorry to disagree with you Jason and Nick, but I think you’re confused. The Missouri Budget Project was one of the first nonprofit groups to support Governor Blunt’s Insure MO proposal this year. They’ve been consistently supporting health care policies, whether sponsored by Republicans or Democrats or both.

You need to get your facts straight.

— Joe
3:59 pm May 28th, 2008

The Missouri Budget Project complained that Insure Missouri didn’t go far enough but was better than nothing.

The fact that Insure Missouri was too much government run healthcare is the reason that MBP supported it and why it didn’t pass.

They are a democrat organization staff with democrat has beens or wanna-be’s and their board is essentially the same.

They and the others mentioned in the earlier post are well-known democrat front groups period.

Lisa12 - go back and read McCain’s proposal. Individual policies are the way to go to reduce cost and it includes some changes to insurance regulations and mandates. It is much better than any socialized universal health plan.

— JasonB
6:32 pm May 28th, 2008

Jason,
I would love to know what regulations McCain is proposing to change. Do you have a link?

Somehow, I just can’t imagine a law that says no one can be rejected for pre-existing conditions. Can you imagine … everyone would wait until they got cancer to apply for insurance.

— Lisa12
9:34 pm May 28th, 2008

Jason,
I just went to McCain’s website, and read his entire page on healthcare. I did not see any proposal to change any regulations. I have previously spent hours researching his proposal by reading news articles on it. I have not seen anything there about changing any regulations. If you have a link, I would love to see it. Otherwise, McCain is pulling the wool over your eyes, and you are falling for it.

— Lisa12
9:44 pm May 28th, 2008

Jason,
When McCain says, people with pre-existing conditions will be covered by state high-risk pools, that is a crock of sh*t. Right now, we pay $12,000 to insure our family of four. A high-risk pool would cost us $36,000 … with Missouri contributing an additional $24,000. When Missouri is flooded with folks who have pre-existing conditions, they won’t have the money to cover them and our cost would be $60,000. It might as well be $1 million.

Don’t forget, the odds are pretty good that you will be in the same boat. Pre-existing condition means pretty much anything you have ever been treated for.

— Lisa12
9:53 pm May 28th, 2008

Pages: « 1 [2] Show All