Web Search powered by YAHOO! SEARCH
05.06.2008 9:35 pm

Blunt to Nixon on email fight: Show me your backup tapes

Gov. Matt Blunt’s staff has targeted Attorney General Jay Nixon’s office, in a not-too-subtle attempt to broaden the controversy over the preservation of state emails.

Blunt chief of staff Trish Vincent blasted Nixon in a statement Tuesday, saying that he’s been resisting the turning over of his staff e-mails and backup tapes sought by the governor in an open-records request made in March.

The statement comes a day after an independent investigation team set up by Nixon filed suit against the governor, alleging that current or former members of the governor’s administration had destroyed e-mails and ordered the destruction of backup tapes.

(Click here to see Tuesday’s account on the mother ship.)

Said Vincent in Blunt’s counter punch:

 “Governor Blunt issued a directive on November 15, 2007, to save all e-mails in the governor’s office including every e-mail backup tape that existed under the old disaster recovery system,” Vincent said in the statement. “The governor’s directive was followed and every e-mail backup tape available since August 28, 2007, has been retained.

   “Given Attorney General Nixon’s grandstanding and legal antics on the issue of e-mail we would assume he has retained all of his e-mail backup tapes so now we are asking him to produce every e-mail backup tape he and his office has retained.  We are also asking that he submit every tape created since August 28, 2007, as soon as possible and others may follow.

       “Jay Nixon’s refusal to join with Governor Blunt and save all e-mails is disturbing as is his refusal to join the new e-mail retention and retrieval system that Governor Blunt is creating.”

Nixon spokesman Scott Holste said that the attorney general’s office already has sent over copies of the state-mandated document-retention schedule for Nixon’s office (the latest version dates from 2007) and “thousands of pages of documents to the state Republican Party (an earlier Sunshine request) and the governor’s office.”

Holste said that more documents will be given to the governor’s office in the coming days and weeks. He noted that that governor’s Sunshine request was for documents going back to 2005, in some cases.

1 Star2 Stars3 Stars4 Stars5 Stars (No Ratings Yet)
Loading ... Loading ...
9 comments

I remember the very first days of the Blunt administration, when he gave away the store to all the state regulated industries by bringing in everyone of their officials and lobbyists and put people on board approved in advance by the very industries to be regulated.

Now we have a PSC that’s a lapdog for utilities and meets with the utility executives before and during pending rate cases or issues. The Secretary of State no longer regulates businesses like Wadell Reed which is represented by the governor’s sister, and was busted twice by Secretary of State Robin Carnahan for improper practices with annuities owned by seniors. We have the fee offices which are all managed by the same private companies, owned by who knows, and formed at the same time the above shenanigans were going on inside the Blunt administration.

No wonder Matt Blunt and his crooked cronies destroyed the e-mails which would likely put them in federal prison. Just as Scott Eckersly has said; “they’re politically damaging.” Now Blunt and his ilk, having destroyed the evidence, are trying to blow smoke all over Jay Nixon. These people have no shame.

— Tim Hogan
8:03 am May 7th, 2008

Funny phrase of the day: “an independent investigation team set up by Nixon.” Yes, I’m sure they are quite independent, considering they were appointed by the guy who thought he’d be running against the target of their investigation. What a joke.

— Nick Kasoff
8:53 am May 7th, 2008

Wow, what is Blunt hiding? Sure the cover up is *usually* always worse than the crime, but the extreme - illegal -measures the Blunt administration has taken to hide these emails makes one speculate that there must be a real doozy hidden in there somewhere. It was enough to keep him running for reelection.

— Glic
8:57 am May 7th, 2008

With our state being run by big business and special interests, is there any reason they attack the one who person (Nixon) who still stands up for the common people? Over the years Nixon has a proven track record of doing what is right for the people. Blunt and his cronies are trying all they can to take him down, but he still stands strong.

Let’s not forget Blunt dropped out of the race with some song and dance excuse. You know things are bad when the rats abandon the ship.

Go Nixon, go! You are doing a great job!

— Robert
9:06 am May 7th, 2008

Still stands up for the common people? NIXON? He’s done nothing but run for governor since he’s been AG (with the possible exception of his failed attempt to unseat Kit Bond), and has pandered and pandered for votes.

His recent pandering job, in which the media seems to give him a pass, includes extended the state requirement to fund K-12 education to include K-16. Nixon “claims” that the fiscal impact of such legislation would ONLY be around $60 million, but he had better multiply that by ten if he thinks he’s going to be able to make a dent at all!

This email crap has been a scam since day one, and an attempt by Nixon to try to hold himself up on a pedestal while he ran against Blunt. What is Nixon going to do when Blunt’s emails become public record, but his still haven’t?

Stay tuned. This is FAR from over!

— Jim (the republican)
9:51 am May 7th, 2008

Nice new layout–wow!

— Tim
3:51 pm May 7th, 2008

Seems to me that Blunt is the one that was itching for a fight when he unceremoniously fired Scott Eckersly and then less-ceremoniously (if you can believe it) sent a dossier of Eckersly’s personal material - which I’m sure they didn’t give him time to gather up before he was forced out of the Gov’s office - to several media outlets. Seems to me Jay Nixon didn’t start anything. The Boy Blunder brought this on himself.

— Penelope
7:34 pm May 7th, 2008

Blunt is alledged to have deleted e-mails after they had been requested, in fact he had all these e-mails download on other computers to reveiew before he deleted them while knowing that they had been requested. My question is, why isn’t someone being prosecuted for a crime here?

What is it with some of you, you actually believe that ones should be above the law? Well, most of us already know all too well, that there are many above judicial law, many are very protected from their crimes within this system, they are truly above the law of man.

— D. Walker
8:30 pm May 7th, 2008

Puuuulease… Nixon is for the people? Recall his infamous case several years ago in “Dogtown” of shutting down a mom and daughter store where their CRIME was selling “imposter” designer purses… “Big Jay” was PROTECTING we women from the “evil” mom and daughter… What a joke… There were other, more serious crimes occurring around the state at that time, but the fake purses was what that coward decided to target. He sure made our streets safe from the “dangerous” mom and daughter…. And never mind that now every kiosk in every mall sells fake purses … Where’s Big Jay now? Can’t he take on the malls ?

— Got2BeReal
4:50 pm May 10th, 2008
Jo Mannies