Web Search powered by YAHOO! SEARCH
05.05.2008 6:55 pm

Court decision gives a push to Voter ID bill in House

When the Supreme Court ruled last week that Indiana’s Voter ID bill was constitutional, House communications director Barry Bennett predicted that a “bucket-load” of bills on Voter ID would be proposed next year.

Republicans didn’t wait that long. A proposal by Sedalia Republican Stanley Cox made its way through the House Rules Committee this morning. Cox’s bill, HJR48, would amend the Missouri constitution to require voters to provide photo identification when they vote.

Missouri lawmakers passed a similar measure two years ago but it was ruled unconstitutional by the state Supreme Court. Missouri’s issue is not identical to Indiana’s, so the U.S. Supreme Court ruling might not mean that Missouri’s proposal would pass constitutional muster.

Cox said the high court’s ruling, though, had an effect on getting his bill through committee. It had languished with no action since February. “I don’t think it would have been voted out of the committee if not for last week’s decision,” Cox said.

During the hearing, Democrat John Patrick Burnett of Kansas City and House Majority Floor Leader Steve Tilley, R-Perryville, negotiated that the bill would come to the floor with timed debate. That is a procedure that happens often on controversial bills so that the minority party has an opportunity to be heard. Both sides will have an hour and 15 minutes to make their case, though with motions and other techniques, the time will likely be much longer.

The committee agreed to the timed debate and passed the bill out of committee 4-2.

Tags:
2 comments

Comments are closed.

‘Fraid the Supreme Court put a little blood in the water. If you’ve ever seen a National Geographic special about sharks, the anaolgy to a feeding frenzy is apt, right down to the intellectual capacity of the participants. November can’t get here soon enough.

— Picture this
7:13 am May 6th, 2008

http://www.schneier.com/essay-133.html
Regularly quoted in the media, Schneier has written op ed pieces for several major newspapers, and has testified on security before the United States Congress on many occasions.

Secure voting machines are just one component of a fair and honest election, but they’re an increasingly important part.

They’re where a dedicated attacker can most effectively commit election fraud (and we know that changing the results can be worth millions).

But we shouldn’t forget other voter suppression tactics:

- telling people the wrong polling place or election date,

- taking registered voters off the voting rolls,

- having too few machines at polling places, or

- making it onerous for people to register.

Oddly enough, ineligible people voting isn’t a problem in the U.S., despite political rhetoric to the contrary;

Every study shows their numbers to be so small as to be insignificant.

And photo ID requirements actually cause more problems than they solve. http://www.demos.org/page337.cfm

— Publius
7:36 pm May 6th, 2008