Web Search powered by YAHOO! SEARCH
05.13.2008 10:17 am

Curators wary about letting student rep vote

St. Louis Post-Dispatch

Missouri’s Congressional delegation aren’t the only ones sweating redistricting.

Conventional wisdom has the state losing a seat in Congress after the 2010 census. The redistricting, however, could affect another political body - the University of Missouri Board of Curators.

State law requires the Board of Curators to have nine members, and that each of those members come from a different one of the state’s nine Congressional districts.

But if the state sheds a Congressional district … what then?

Sen. Chuck Graham, whose district includes the state university’s flagship campus in Columbia, has proposed replacing the ninth member with a voting student. (The board’s current student representative is not given a vote.)

Graham has long tried, and failed, to get the board’s student member a vote.

But this year, the measure has already passed the Senate, and is gaining momentum in the House. In response, the curators called a special meeting Monday morning to vote on on a resolution opposing Graham’s bill. It passed 7-1.

As our higher ed reporter, Kavita Kumar reported today, the curators said they did not believe a student, with only a two-year term, could serve long enough on the board to fully understand the issues involved with governing the state’s university system.

“This is my  sixth  year and I’m certainly still learning,” said Curator Don Walsworth. “For a two-year stint, (the student curator) does not have the background and knowledge to vote on some very important issues.”

The Columbia Missourian also reports that the current student representative to the board, Tony Luetkemeyer, did not participate in Monday’s meeting. It’s not that Luetkemeyer was irked that he could not vote on the resolution– he was taking a final exam at the time of the meeting.

1 Star2 Stars3 Stars4 Stars5 Stars (1 votes, average: 5 out of 5)
Loading ... Loading ...
3 comments

Comments are closed.

When the student curator bill passed, it was PROMISED that there would never be an attempt to allow that student curator to have a vote on matters, ESPECIALLY in closed session.

Graham has completely gone back on that promise, and I don’t blame the curators for being concerned.

— Jim (the republican)
10:35 am May 13th, 2008

Students have been working on this for the last 12 years. UM system students now contribute more to their education than does the state–The student curator is on average 24 years old and in grad/professional school when they serve, most with extensive university experience and knowledge from serving in campus leadership positions. It’s one vote out of nine, and the curators are being disrespectful to students by saying things like “2 years isn’t enough for a student to master the issues.” With that logic, none of them should get to vote their first two years! The bipartisan measure (sponsored by R in House and D in Senate) should pass today despite the curators’ last minute “emergency” attempt to convince lawmakers otherwise.

— anonymous
12:36 pm May 13th, 2008

Don Walsworth has got to be kidding! He claims that students should not be allowed to vote because they don’t know the ropes. He also says that after six years he is still learning. Does that mean he abstained from voting until he “learned the ropes”?

Incumbent politicians use this same argument, too. Well, everyone is new at sometime. And, if anyone deserves a vote on the B of C, it’s one of the students who are paying astronimcal tuition. (And, it is one vote–hardly enough to change anything.)

— suzyjax
1:56 pm May 13th, 2008