Web Search powered by YAHOO! SEARCH
05.13.2008 12:51 pm

Extra protection for City Hall officials? Signs point to no

St. Louis Post-Dispatch

Aldermen appear poised to bring the budget ax down on a request to add extra security for a pair of elected city officials.

As the Post-Dispatch reported earlier this month, Board of Aldermen President Lewis Reed had sought to add two deputy sheriffs to the city’s payroll that would be assigned to his office and the comptroller.

After being quizzed about the proposal at a budget meeting this morning, Reed backed away from the plan.

“If it’s going to be a big controversy, just remove them,” Reed said.

The city’s original budget plan, distributed around City Hall in a thick binder last month, called for the sheriff to get three extra deputies.

But the city’s Board of Estimate and Apportionment approved an amendment that would add two more deputies at a salary of $26,988 each. The Estimate Board - comprised of Reed, the comptroller and the mayor - must sign-off on all of the city’s major financial decisions, including the budget.

The two extra deputies, according to Reed’s office, would be used on an “as needed” basis to provide additional protection for Reed and Comptroller Darlene Green, particularly when they are at an event away from City Hall.

An aide for Reed has said that the deputy could also serve as a driver.

When not otherwise needed, Reed has said, the deputies would be added to the sheriff’s courthouse security detail.

Reed said today he would prefer to use city sheriff officers — whose duties include transporting prisoners and serving as court bailiffs - for extra protection rather than regular city police, who should not be taken away from “stopping the murders, rapes and robberies out there.”

But Alderman Stephen Conway, chair of the aldermanic committee that oversees the budget, questioned why the city needed more deputies at City Hall or the courthouse.

“The sheriff didn’t ask for it,” Conway said.

Conway said he would seek to cut the request when his committee makes its budget recommendations in a few weeks, an attempt he is confident other aldermen will endorse.

Comptroller Darlene Green, who also appeared before the budget panel today, said the idea for additional security belonged to Reed, not her.

Though her office said earlier she would welcome the extra protection, Green said today it is not a good use of taxpayer dollars, although both she, the mayor and Reed supported the measure at the Estimate Board.

“If the city says, ‘Comptroller, here is your bodyguard,’ I will reject it,” Green said.

reed.JPG
Reed

Darlene Green
Green

1 Star2 Stars3 Stars4 Stars5 Stars (No Ratings Yet)
Loading ... Loading ...
6 comments

Comments are closed.

Did the Comptroller say that with a straight face?

This is the same woman who has asked repeatedly for a driver from the police department and then wrote an Op-Ed telling people not to support a tax for more cops that she originally proposed!

I am tired of her lies and her blame game. Unless someone runs against her and we can get rid of her incompetence people will continue to look at Silly Hall and laugh.

— Sam
1:49 pm May 13th, 2008

I find it difficult to believe that St. Louis City Hall has so much security at our expense. I have traveled to chicago frequent times and I have been to the Chicago City hall which has about 14 stories high and there are no security enterances at that building. That was last year.

I think St. Louis City Hall need to review it security options. I do not think it was ncessary and overblown. That is my personal opinion.

Those people who think they deserve security ought to pay out of their pockets for added security.

Nothing has happened at St. Louis City Hall to warrant such measures! Prove me wrong?

Thanks,
Paul

— Paul Kiel
2:24 pm May 13th, 2008

Right. City hall should wait until a tragedy happens before addressing security issues. All the citizens, officials and employees who use city hall should have to wait until something terrible happens before increasing security.

I support the mayor having a security/driving detail with 3 police sergeants costing $200,000 a year. And I support the sheriff\’s proactive approach to keeping everyone who is not the mayor safe too.

— skinny
3:24 pm May 13th, 2008

The mayor traveled about 20 feet in the same building to attend the meeting, accompanied by his $75K/year police bodyguard escort. The Fix didn’t tell you that; the fix is in.

— the EYE
3:59 pm May 13th, 2008

Dear Don Suggs, er the EYE,

Why do you hate the Mayor so much? He didn’t even point out Queen Darlene’s latest waste of tax dollars. Sounds like Pres. Reed and he took her on her word about this extra security. Turns out she lied as usual and it is just for her own personal gain. Seriously Mr. Suggs, oops, I mean EYE, we all know you hate the Mayor and bow to Queen Darlene but we are tired of your racist tactics.

— Sam
4:27 pm May 13th, 2008

Sam,

Thought I’d help you with your reading comprehension. Perhaps English is not your first language. From the report:

“As the Post-Dispatch reported earlier this month, Board of Aldermen President Lewis Reed had sought to add two deputy sheriffs…”

Reed asked for it, plain and simple. Even the Post got this fact right, why can’t you?

— skinny
8:47 am May 14th, 2008