Gephardt, Robin Carnahan make headlines on The Huffington Post
Sunday night’s version of The Huffington Post had a couple interesting Missouri connections:
A) Missouri Secretary of State Robin Carnahan writes a featured blog post about her objections to the proposed constitutional amendment mandating a government-issued photo ID. The New York Times also weighs in on the controversy;
B) Conservative columnist William Kristol predicts that former U.S. Rep. Richard A. Gephardt, D-St. Louis County, will be Democratic presidential frontrunner Barack Obama’s choice for VP. (Interesting idea, especially since Gephardt has been campaigning for months on behalf of Hillary Clinton.)



It’s interesting to me that Ms Carnahan’s falsified rantings are featured in such a extreme left leaning publication as the Huffington post. Equally as interesting is the NYT, another far left leaning publication. Never once, in either publication does the fact that more than 20 million illegal aliens who are in this country already jeopardize the fair voting process. It’s well known that Ms. Carnahan is a very left-leaning liberal Democrat.
The fact is, Democrats have long opposed Republican efforts to combat voter fraud by requiring a photo ID (among other proposals). Such efforts, they argue, could potentially suppress the vote of minorities, the old, and the infirm. As such, according to Democrats, these laws are constitutionally infirm. Obviously, the US Supreme Court disagrees.
By a 6-3 vote, the panel held that Indiana’s strict photo identification requirements meet constitutional muster in a precedent-setting ruling that could open the door for other states to adopt similar requirements.
After all, one has to produce photo ID to cash a check. Why is it any more burdensome in exercising a basic American right that, unfortunately, can be prone to abuse, if not fraud? The memories of widespread voting problems in Florida’s version of the 2000 presidential election and this state’s controversial 2004 gubernatorial stakes are too fresh.
Washington state requires voters to show proof of identification but not photo ID. Acceptable forms of ID include a driver’s license or state ID card — or a voter-registration card, a utility bill, student ID card, a bank statement or even a paycheck.
Such a requirement could be in helping curb illegal immigration, because a person must be a citizen of the United States and a legal resident of the state to register to vote. All are efforts to protect the integrity of the ballot in light of voter reforms launched at the state and federal levels in recent years.
Voting is a fundamental American right, but one that also has a few basic restrictions. It is no more unreasonable to ask people to prove who they are when they register or cast a ballot than it is when they cash a check for a few groceries.
Despite the overheated rhetoric from the left, there is strong evidence that it happens regularly. Few can forget evidence of the dead voting and electing Ophelia Ford to the Tennessee state senate. In Milwaukee, investigators are unable to explain how 4,500 more ballots were cast than voters showed up to the polls, and have established that 100 voters used fake names, voted twice, or used a dead person’s name.