Web Search powered by YAHOO! SEARCH
05.05.2008 12:56 am

Mo GOP targeting 300 pro-Ron Paul at Monday ‘credentials meeting’

According to an email from some Missouri supporters of Ron Paul, sent late Sunday night, the state Republican Party has scheduled a special “credentials meeting” for 10 a.m. Monday at the  Blue Armory in Jefferson City.

At the meeting, according to the email, about 300 of the 1,900 elected delegates to the state GOP convention May 30-June 1 must disprove allegations that — presumably — accuse the targeted delegates of not being bona fide Republicans and/or not committed to supporting John McCain for president.

“The state Central Committee spent approximately $1,000 on certified mailings that do not even state the allegations,” said the email sent from one challenged delegate. “A small group of insiders in the Missouri Republican Party are attempting to prevent delegates, properly elected at their county caucuses, from attending the state Convention in Branson…

“Although many have repeatedly attempted to find out the basis of the challenges, these 300-plus delegates have been left in the dark and forced to travel great distances, some well over 100 miles, to finally learn the charges against them. Challenged delegates will be limited to a mere five minutes to respond to the charges with no time to prepare.”

Those challenged include “current Republican Committee members, members of  the Missouri Republican Assembly, current Republican candidates, and attendees of previous conventions, with the only common factor being that they voted for Republican Congressman Ron Paul during the primary.”

Here’s a few examples cited in the email:

Laura Mize: “As a 78-year-old long-time Republican voter and the daughter of a lifetime staunch Republican from Southeast Missouri, I voted for the only man that represents the principles of the Republican Party as taught by my father and now they want to throw me away like an old newspaper.  Well, they have started a fire instead!  I’m so angry, I will show up even if I have to be carried on a stretcher!”

Eric Vought, Republican Committeeman from Springfield: “Having just worked to sell tickets for one fundraiser and putting together a donation for their silent auction, it disturbs me that they are spending $3.60 per certified letter, times a few hundred delegates to challenge all of these people. Why should I bother raising money for them if this is how they choose to spend it?” 

Tom Klein of St. Louis County:  “I thought we were the ‘party of the open door’ as resolved in the National Party Rules. Well, now that door is being slammed in my face!  I know the vast majority of us Republicans are very good people but you know what they say… All that is necessary for the triumph of evil is that good men do nothing.”

The Paul supporters assert that similar actions are happening elsewhere.

“Across the nation, including Oklahoma, Nevada and Texas, the time and location of conventions have been changed at the last minute and party insiders have attempted to sneak in ‘delegates’ to inflate their numbers who were never elected at their local caucuses.“ 

“Others have walked out with crucial documents belonging to the convention, convention Chairmen have run roughshod over the rules of order by refusing to recognize delegates not from their faction, and some have simply walked out shutting off the lights to the convention hall as they did in Nevada.”

“Because of growing concern over honesty and integrity in government, a new group is being founded, Statesmen for our Constitutional Republic, to educate voters about the inner workings of our political mechanisms, encourage and teach people to be active leaders in our government, the Republican Party, and, especially, our communities. …”

A co-founder of the group, Curtis Abbott of Springfield, Mo., says, “”It is a sad day when much of the public believes that their  involvement no longer matters because ‘the insiders’ have already decided who is going to win and those most involved suppress their own conscience to support the lesser of two evils. “We are setting up monthly caucuses where the real issues will be discussed, we are going to the high schools and colleges to raise up the next generation of Statesmen, and we are pledging ourselves to high ideals of principle, conduct, and courage. What we do matters greatly; how we do it matters every bit as much.  We mustn’t merely know what is right: we must have the courage to do it.”

1 Star2 Stars3 Stars4 Stars5 Stars (5 votes, average: 4.8 out of 5)
Loading ... Loading ...
69 comments

Comments are closed.

You Ronulans have made my day!

Thanks again for injecting a little crazed paranoid rhetoric into what otherwise be a quiet sunny Monday.

Think I’ll write a check to MY PARTY to help with the postage.

— tsquare
9:19 am May 5th, 2008

All you Ron Paul supporters need to wake up and realize there is a constitutional scholar running for president, an actual constitutional law professor who taught constitutional law for ten years at one of the premier law schools in the country. On the other hand, you could support McCain, who graduated 796th out of 800 at the Naval Academy. McCain is just another Bush-like flunkout who coasted to where he is on his Daddy’s coattails. We need someone in the Oval Office who has a brain, for a change!

— Carlos
9:44 am May 5th, 2008

tsquare is right. Voting has nothing to do with supporting a principled candidate. It’s just about supporting “my team.” Politics is just a spectator sport, and all the fairweather fans need to go home. It doesn’t matter who our team has up, we should support him!

— Bob
9:58 am May 5th, 2008

Interesting they will throw away their money like this and expect people to waste gas to come to these “hearings” yet don’t care when Rush Limbaugh encourages republicans to change parties to throw the democratic primaries. They have really slipped. You can bet they won’t have my vote this time around.

Another republican for Obama…

— Boris Kafka
10:23 am May 5th, 2008

I am a republican. John McCain is NOT MY nominee. I WILL NOT vote for him, regardless of the situation. Should be enough said, but, apparently one can lead a neo-conservative (ironically nothing “neo” here and even less “condervative”) to logic, but you can’t make them think.

At least with another four more years of Clintons, conservatism goes out on its’ shield. This is more than I can say for the supposed “warrior” on our ticket.

— shane scheid
10:38 am May 5th, 2008

This is exactly the kind of shenanigans that is driving many of us from the party. The RNC might as well stop sending me “surveys” in hopes of getting donations. They can also find someone else to do the phone banks this fall. My donations of either money or time are over.

As a conservative, Ron Paul was the obvious choice for me in the primary. I have voted Republican in every presidential election since turning 18. However, I will never, ever vote for John McCain and will vote third party this fall for the first time in my life. We need to get back to Constitutional principles and away from a government that increasingly intrudes into our private lives.

The way the Republican Party has treated an honorable man like Dr. Paul is despicable. The way they’ve alienated Republican Ron Paul supporters is idiocy.

— Susan
10:44 am May 5th, 2008

The republican party is a PRIVATE group, they can choose to maniuplate things however they want. This is not a government issue but a private club issue.

If the Republicans don’t want people who believe in true conservative values it’s their right.

As far as I’ve seen The Republicans have become Democrats and the Democrats have become socialists. The Party name is just kept for name recognition there are no “Republicans” left running the RNC just Neoconservatives.

— Jared Lorz
10:58 am May 5th, 2008

Riddle me this…..Comparing the specific policy issues of Sen.McCain and Dr. Paul, I cannot help but notice that it is McCain who is in the wrong party.

Democrats are the party of compassionate empire.

Medicine?…Dems are the party of more gov’t “help”.

McCain-Lieberman….need I elaborate?

McCain-Feingold….need I elaborate?

Taxation?…McCain has stated repeatedly that he has no understanding of economics. Not surprisingly, by all accounts of his program desires, he will raise taxes. Is it still conservatism if you raise taxes out of ignorance rather than governing philosophy?

Education?…more money from, and thus more power to, the Dept. of Education. Reagan wanted to abolish this (and many other) departments.

2nd Ammendment?….”Ithink there should be no reason why hunters and collectors should not be allowed…” thus proving he has not a clue that the second ammendment to the UNITED STATES’ CONSTITUTION is about shooting despots, not deer. \

For all that talk radio likes to banty on and on that the Clintons have never made an honest penny, working exclusively as “public servants”, they would do well to apply the same analysis to Senator McCain, who has worked in government in one way or another his entire life as well.

DID ANYONE THINK TO SEND ONE OF THESE LOYALTY SURVEYS TO THE SENATOR??

— shane scheid
11:25 am May 5th, 2008

Shane: (post #18)

I agree 100% I do… really.

The question is: of the three left which one will do “the best” job toward those goals?

Not Hillary of Obama…

McCain was not my first choice… nor my second… nor even third… but he’s miles ahead of those two.

— tsquare
11:33 am May 5th, 2008

As if any more proof is needed….the votes of the “little people” no longer count…

— eric
11:39 am May 5th, 2008

Pages: « 1 [2] 3 4 5 6 7 » Show All