Web Search powered by YAHOO! SEARCH
05.16.2008 11:19 pm

St. Louis transit tax increase is part of St. Louis County transit tax puzzle

A picket opposing a half-cent increase in the transit sales tax in St. Louis County reminded me on Friday that I overlooked a piece of the proposal’s puzzle – a one-fourth cent increase in the transit sales tax in St. Louis.

With a sign declaring “Metro should move people around, not pass money around” hanging from his neck, Clarence Rowles of North County stood in Friday’s lunch hour at Forsyth Boulevard and Central Avenue in the heart of downtown Clayton. As I listened, he pointed out to a bystander that St. Louis would see a tax increase if the county proposal passed.

The city’s voters approved the tax in November, 1997 by 331 votes out of 38,411 cast. The same election saw 58 percent of 138,751 voters reject the increase in St. Louis County. The city never levied the tax, delaying the increase until county voters approve the same boost.

Metro estimates the St. Louis tax increase would raise about $9.3 million a year, Dianne Williams, a transit agency spokeswoman, said.

It would join three other pieces in County Executive Charlie Dooley’s transit tax increase proposal:

> Half the money from the tax increase – initially about $40 million a year – would go to operate Metro. The transit agency would continue to receive revenue from the current one-fourth cent transit sales tax.

> The other half of revenue from the tax increase, also about $40 million a year, would help pay for MetroLink expansion.

> The county each year would adjust the shares of revenue from a separate half-cent transportation sales tax that would go to Metro and to county arterial roads. The shares for Metro and arterial roads would vary with the needs of a particular year.

County voters are likely to consider the tax increase on Nov. 4.

The total sales tax rate in St. Louis County is as low as 6.075 cents in the unincorporated area. It exceeds 8 percent in shopping centers where a transportation development district levies a tax of as much of 1 percent on top of state, county and municipal sales taxes. St. Louis’s total sales tax is 7.741 percent.

If the half-cent increase passes, a county resident purchasing a vehicle worth $20,000 would pay an additional $100 in sales taxes.

County officials had included the St. Louis tax increase in their planning, Garry Earls, the county’s chief operating officer, said. The city tax revenue would offset additional money the county would take from the transportation sales tax for roads. He did not expect the county to take more than about $10 million a year in additional revenue.

Both St. Louis and St. Louis County levy the half-cent transportation sales tax and the current quarter-cent transit tax that Dooley wants to increase in the county.

St. Louis sends all of its transportation tax revenue – nearly $18 million a year – to Metro.

Earls reiterated that Metro needs a good road system to operate buses. “We have to do the roads first, then the bus system,” he said.

The county official also confirmed that the county has committed more than $15 million to four projects. He said the county may spend money on most of them before a Nov. 4 transit tax vote.

They are:

> $6 million to build a “jughandle” that would move traffic from northbound Hanley Road under Hanley to westbound Eager Road in Brentwood and Richmond Heights.

> $5.1 million as the county’s share of the improvement of the interchange at Interstate 270 and Dorsett Road in Maryland Heights to help move new traffic generated by expansion at the nearby north office complex of the Edward D. Jones company.

> $3 million for land purchases for a connection of extended Highway 141 at Olive Boulevard to an extended Maryland Heights Expressway in Chesterfield.

> $1 million as the county share of the cost of rebuilding the Old Gravois Road Bridge across the Meramec River between Sunset Hills and Fenton. Earls said some of that money may be in in-kind design services rather than cash.

Rowles, the protester, said he doesn’t like the way government spends its money. He explained why he was picketing in Clayton: “It’s easier to defeat a proposal if you stop it before it goes on the ballot.”

1 Star2 Stars3 Stars4 Stars5 Stars (2 votes, average: 3 out of 5)
Loading ... Loading ...
4 comments

Comments are closed.

i will not vote for any tax increase for anything,until st.louis co.rolls back the realestate tax increases for people who are retired and on fixed incomes,and passes some kind of legislation to control M S D.they answer to no one.and it shows,they WASTE more money than they spend on construction.

— fish
9:31 am May 17th, 2008

I guess we are going to let our great metrolink lines (that have sparked billions of development and thousands of jobs) go down the drain along with our buses and roads. Don’t protest Metro, protest MODOT and those outstate interests that continue to stagnant the St. Louis area. Ya know what could help pay for public transportation and education, while keeping taxes low? Casino Gambling! To bad those rednecks and inner city preachers in our legislature voted down the $500 loss limit. The state of Missouri has a lack of revenue, thats why St. Louis is hurting for funds. I guess we will have to revert back to dirt roads eventually, because our politicians will bankrupt the state trying to preach morality.

— Joshua
11:16 am May 17th, 2008

GREAT Thoughts Joshua!!!!! Short sighted people like fish are the ones that stagnate the metro area besides your correct hit on MODOT & the outstate interests. We give so much and get so little that we have to take care of ourselves because outstate will never let us have any part of what we really deserve!

— BNB
12:21 am May 18th, 2008

Short sighted? I don’t think so. St. Louis families already pay hundreds of dollars a year in taxes that go to Metro, which the vast majority of them do not use. And the fact that the highway 40 shutdown had almost no impact on traffic, and very little impact on Metro ridership, demonstrates that further spending on Metro is a waste.

And as far as additional road spending goes … looks like Dooley has turned his back on north county again. For those of you who haven’t been up here, our “interchanges” are obsolete and dangerous, and have not been touched since 270 was built. Maryland Heights has so much casino money that they are building a gigantic new city government complex. They have a city aquatic complex. They have the Maryland Heights Expressway and the Page Extension, all built at great taxpayer expense. They will benefit greatly from the Edward Jones expansion - so why can’t they pay for the improvement of the interchange?

When the campaign gets going, stay informed on efforts to stop this tax increase by visiting http://www.stoptheprop.com.

— Nick Kasoff
7:57 pm May 18th, 2008